Mafia #7 -- The Play

I was put up for "lurking" without posting...
 
My point exactly. Hn was thinking about voting dc because he was "lurking." I said the same exact thing last game but first asked dc why his name is always up but he never posts...he responded that he leaves his browser open. Now, personally I think that that reason alone to vote is dumb. And then hn's next posts concerning dc talk about different suspicious activities that he never originally mentioned...I'm not saying that dc isn't a suspect but hn is way more suspicious imo
 
I agree that as of right now Swayde is suspect, but I'm concerned about an overwhelming train forming that would negate any more info. At this point I'm a bit curious about jpappy and Jo. Jpappy for nothing more than a feeling (and, no I'm not pulling a CL) his posts just seem to be in odd "clusters". Jo, because to be caught up and miss the reason for Ice's vote seems very odd. That has been the focus of most of the actual non-chit chat converation. To keep discussions going....

I vote to lynch Joander.


Ok, I've looked back trying to find a case against myself and this is the only post (115) I could find that I used the word custer in. It was completely non-commital (I'm still not sure if Jpappy looks mafia to me), but apparently this and implied info based on posts that were cherry picked is enough. When I'm dead, please look at the engineer who says no one listens to him and those that follow without question.
 
Like I said... it was a very "logical case". I used the wrong word (I do work in wireless so it's a pretty common term) and it was early, but that was enough for you. As far as why I stopped, I haven't. I'm still trying to figure out what pattern everyone could fit into with the "New" and "Old" mafia, but I'm dang sure not gonna post any thoughts about it until I think it's solid now.

The fact you used the word 'cluster' is irrelevant. You are trying to make it sound like you were doing something completely different than Ice or Z and just using the word 'cluster' to mean something else. But, you were doing the same thing that Z and Ice were. Trying to tie people together based on their votes. I wouldn't have had a problem with it, but you were also doing it on Day 1 when no voting or posting patterns had even been established.
 
So you originally voted for him ONLY because he was lingering in the thread but wasn't posting? Then you found more stuff to back up your weak case...am I correct or not?

No. I mentioned his name when I saw him watching the thread. He responded fairly quickly and then immediately followed someone's vote against me when I questioned him. It wasn't him "lurking, it was him actively watching and defending.
 
The fact you used the word 'cluster' is irrelevant. You are trying to make it sound like you were doing something completely different than Ice or Z and just using the word 'cluster' to mean something else. But, you were doing the same thing that Z and Ice were. Trying to tie people together based on their votes. I wouldn't have had a problem with it, but you were also doing it on Day 1 when no voting or posting patterns had even been established.

I guess if looking for possibilities on day 1 is wrong, I'm guilty. I would have apparently been better off voting for the first role player or the third from the last to post, etc. etc.
 
No. I mentioned his name when I saw him watching the thread. He responded fairly quickly and then immediately followed someone's vote against me when I questioned him. It wasn't him "lurking, it was him actively watching and defending.

The thing is that you never mentioned any of this when you VOTED for him except for the lurking which is not a good enough reason for a vote. At that time you were grasping for straws...I think you just got lucky with your observation later
 
Ok, I've looked back trying to find a case against myself and this is the only post (115) I could find that I used the word custer in. It was completely non-commital (I'm still not sure if Jpappy looks mafia to me), but apparently this and implied info based on posts that were cherry picked is enough. When I'm dead, please look at the engineer who says no one listens to him and those that follow without question.


HN, this is an example of 'clustering'...and you did use the word 'cluster' here, too (not so non-commitally, though). You've grouped myself, DD, Jo, and DC together, and are implying that we're all mafia. You're so sure about it, that you say you may even be hit that night for exposing us...all ON DAY 1
If you're Innocent then I think we really need to look hard at those that voted for you later and especially in a cluster (Mad 144 DD 145 Jo 149 DC 152) and those that removed their votes. No vote KOTD? I'm not convinced of your innocence or guilt, but if mafia cool. If not, you're death won't be in vain.

Please refer to this if I am hit tonight (happens alot :().

And again...although instead of 'cluster' you use 'pack'...then you actually vote for Jo based upon this.
Well folks, that sucked and didn't. Sorry Swayde! I was never convinced, but oh well... I'll miss the slurpees. At least they are killing themselves again!

From my previous post on those voting for swayde in a pack... (Mad 144 DD 145 Jo 149 DC 152).

Since Jo was my vote tonight and appears in this list...

I vote to lynch Joander.

Let's not all jump on anybody in particular. We need discussion. Obviously the massive voting for one person is the wrong thing to do and can't possibly help out the town. I'd like to ask for everyone's top 3 or so and why. My vote isn't in stone yet and I'll move it if another "train" forms.

Here you go again...
Ok, I'll take the blame then. Better to get votes out early for discussion and reaction than to wait to the end. I'd like to hear from anone who voted for Swayde, especially those that voted so closely together.

I think this pretty much shows that you WERE using 'cluster' in the same context as Z and Ice were...
 
The thing is that you never mentioned any of this when you VOTED for him except for the lurking which is not a good enough reason for a vote. At that time you were grasping for straws...I think you just got lucky with your observation later

No, I posted as it happened (with my reasons). I'm only going back because you are. Have you not been reading along?
 
AquariaCentral.com