Folks, please read the red part of this recent HN post, where he claims that he wasn't using 'clusters' to cast suspicion on anyone.
HN, you're squirming, and your untruthfulness just exposed you further....
You say that you didn't even think that the 'cluster' was suspicious? Then what's up with the part saying that people should refer to this post if you're hit tonight?
The 'cluster' is, once again, not suspicious...but you admit to voting for Jo because he was in the 'cluster'. That was one (albeit a lessor) reason.
Here, for not being suspicious of the 'cluster' you want them (especially) to answer for Swayde's death. Why? You're not suspicious of them... (at the point of the game you're pulling quotes from, I was suspicious of everyone. Now, I' suspicious of everyone except those proven innocent. Why aren't you?)
Here's where it gets good, Hooked Newbie. In this post, I start to complain about Z's use of clusters. I even mention the fact that Hooked Newbie is now using them also. Folks don't need to read the whole quote again, just pay attention to the bolded part (Yes, just pay attention to the portion you point out. Forget about the rest of it, the context or timing it was posted in.)
Here's your response, my mafia friend (I'm neither)...note the part "Is that 'cluster' of votes for an innocent not suspicious to you at all?" BINGO! WE HAVE A WINNER! I do believe you just said that the cluster was suspicious to you.... (I said that I thought they were worth looking at).
Now if everyone could go to the top of this post and see where HN said that the cluster was not suspicious to him, then refer to this quote again where he says it is. Mad's leadership abilities are very impressive indeed.
HN, if I could, I'd vote for you twice tonight...
Then do so. Retract your vote and cast it for me again. Wow, you sure react strongly when finally confronted huh?