Mafia #70: The Time Vortex
- Thread starter jpappy789
- Start date
I agree! Not really much else going on yet. Heading out to see Robin Hood.:thm: Be back later!
Gee Noods, I do believe that you are exhibiting the same patterns that got the GS to take a shot at LR.
You pop in, state that nothing is going on,(which is obvious) agree with the latest thought put out by someone else then disappear again.
I was surprised to see LR flip innocent but I still can't see how this kind of play is being helpful.
FireDancer7905
I'm in love!
JB, you (and your team, I'm assuming) have shown some great instincts, but I think you're over-thinking this.
I'm actually just an exclamation point kinda gal! irl, I swear like a sailor (no offense to anyone in the armed forces), albeit one in heels and lipstick. But in the online world, without voice inflection and smiles behind the words, I opt for exclamation points and a more cutesy wording.
As to switching from Mad to Hn, no, I did not mix them up. I had originally placed a vote on Mad for what I thought was a no-reason vote on Hn. He then posted his reason post, and I thought it was well-put. I then swapped votes from Mad to Hn.
I'm not quite sure why assuming that the Dr. will protect you is a problem. I didn't say, "I think that I know who the Prs are! Yay me!! No, I'm not telling, but I think I know!!!" My problem with the previous kind of statement is that it lets the scum know that there may be something obvious that they over-looked in the posting, and that if they look harder they may be able to find a CI. It also leads to the Prs being inclined to comment/defend themselves, which even when done subtly can be dangerous for the town. I thought that the part of jpap's post that talked about the "prayers of one being able to save a soul" or some such wording was pretty clear, and that there was no harm in bringing it up. If I got that pm, I'd be sure to protect a helpful, known CI.
Not sure how to ease your mind about trusting a confirmed CI. Who else am I supposed to trust?
Now, I have to go back and find the post, but someone is/is considering voting for Rb because he said he was scum. Anyone who's played an iffy format with Rb before knows that when things get obnoxiously inconsistent, he gets irritated and wants to make that clear, as he did when he "declared" himself. I think that making it try to look like Rb was serious about being scum, and voting accordingly, is scummy.
FireDancer7905
I'm in love!
And here it is. You're not new, you've played with the ACville's resident grump before - how can you think he's telling the truth? This is the second time this game that my gut has told me to vote for you.
I retract my vote on Wiz and vote to lynch Zaffy.
:bs: First of all how do you know what made the GS decide to shoot Labby? Second of all, do you really believe that your posts and "kind of play" has been helpful? Yes, I checked in, noted there was not much going on and posted as such. I have done my fair share of digging and posting my thoughts on players. Have you? All I have seen from you is debating with anyone that called out Kash for her posts/play, not a whole bunch of bush kicking or anything since she got shot and then you go all noble saying how you are a man of your word and will take the lynch like a good boy.
If you think you have a case against me then please present it.
(BTW, Robin Hood was awesome and Russell Crowe is ----:naughty: :drool
