it just really seems like you have some better cases for people other than twohobbies. him saying something is "random" is your reasoning? it seems like this vote was much more random then if you were to pick someone else that you actually have good reasons to stake. reasoning?
Mafia 72-Vampires game thread
- Thread starter Lab_Rat
- Start date
it just really seems like you have some better cases for people other than twohobbies. him saying something is "random" is your reasoning? it seems like this vote was much more random then if you were to pick someone else that you actually have good reasons to stake. reasoning?
Get over it. This is a GAME. If it was real life i would kill to learn how many people were vamps, but its a GAME. Not RL an GAME. I like to be challanged, thats why i still play these games. If it wasn't challanging i would just quit and do something else. So. now that you undersand that i like a challange when playing a GAME do you understand why i dont want to know the # of vamps?
Look up.
You too.
That lab would choose randomly, and since you and Ice are saying she wouldn't you are protecting the newbs from being looked at.
Jb, Jl, ots one letter, and you got what i meant.
Glad i make you laugh LG.
Mafia 72 notes.
Early Game Notes
------------------------------------
DD actually posting only at night.
LG opens with a need for garlic, is she possibly trying to look innocent, or just playing around?
I open with a role play.
Dag notes that i havent killed myself yet.
Chill opens with a role play, indicating that im evil (pale skin) and that he likes LG ("fetching" in goth attire)
Judge starts game with role play saying s/he is moving in. Reference to vamps? maybe.
More Notes
-------------------------
Dag never answred my question. (post 26)
Rich starts with a "see any bats around".
Wiz enters late. Daughter and computer stuff.
Kashta also enters late (corralation with wiz?) and imedietly jumps on me for my not reading the background. I have since fixed that issue.
I've made my role plays so i seem like i am the preist or the vamp hunter. Wonder why no one seems to have noticed, or cared.
My big POST OR ELSE thing does what its suppoesed to: get people posting. For some reason im jumped on for it...
Rich seems to be very unactive/hiding this game. Wonder why.
Nice role play by LG, but she metions Chill and Judge as potential friends, could be teamwork between them, must look closely at them.
JB starts laying the foundation of my death...(post 51)
LG mentions CHill and Judge again. Look closer, try to find a connection... (post 52)
Chill also makes a connection with LG and Judge, be extra careful with them...(post 53-54)
Really late entry by User_name.
Even later entry by jm11212.
Our vet, Ice, is quiet, doesn't worry me yet.
Wiz comes in after me for not hearing the screams of the vampire attacked townsfolk in the night. Itsa computer dumb --- you can't hear stuff, you need to read it.
LG a push over. Hmmm...
Ices Lab hand picked the Lead Vamp thing comes out. (this will come back to haunt him)
JB mentions that its the best idea hes heard all day. Its the only idea hes heard all day.
some garbage about rules...
Comments on Ices theory.
I comment on JP thinking that lab wouldn't allow a newb to be lead vamp.
2Hobbies comments on it, saying that it was "RANDOM". Worrying. He may be defending himself, i think my vote with fall on him 2day. He also says that the Lead Vamp would not use bite day 1.
JP is just as defensive, saying that my post is BS.
Dag and JP agree that the LV (lead vamp) would use the extra bite on day 1 more then any other day.
WIz thinks i could be Dracula! Oh ha ha ha! Thats funny as hell! There is no way i would be so active if i was an important role. Ha, just the thought...
I think i got the whole barking up the wrong tree thing! I think it was that wiz siad that i shouldn't be looking at the rules, that doesn't help. but then i noted that Ice was the one who originaly siad it (post 113-4-5 or so, that area of the thread anyway)
Chill helps me confirm my thought that 2Hobbies was... "annoyed" with my accusiantion of newbs as LV.
Mr. Palmer has finnished thinking, and has come up with his notes for the game (above). He just hope that people listen to them and understand what they are saying. He also hopes that he doesnt get killed on day one again. He waits and listens to see what the rest of the town thinks, but also places his vote, for what its worth.
I vote to put a stake in 2hobbies.
My head hurts now. If I was super active, like you, where would I fall.
I don't really see the twohobbies reason. Is it because he asked or commented on if the LV was random.
They are. Well, sorry, but he's the one i remeber from my flash tour of Mafia Game history. Let me correct that: ONE of our vets. It doesn't worry me because i have bigger issues right now.
You have to stop with lines like that. That is just to easy.
What are your bigger fish to fry?
which are? its still not sufficient reasoning to why you think that Ice being quiet is not worrying, and why you singled him out as "our" vet. even in your breif stint of mafia games, i am sure you saw at least more then one of the other vets. nearly all of them have been in every single game i have played.
Ice is just the one i remember best. I do not understand why, but i do know when im digging my own grave. At least i wont be a vampire.
Admittedly not much, but followed along the last three.
As far as why I guessed three it seemed to me that Lab went out of her way to get input before starting the game and wanted it to be even and not over quick. With 17 players three just seemed to make sense to me. (I'm still thinking two vampires and Dracula)
Wouldn't the vampires want to get the Seer, Slayer, or Priest first? There odds should be much better on night two.
I do see the advantage of increasing there numbers faster, but they lose that advantage if Dracula's bite is a kill and not one of the three.
FF, where did I say that I thought Lab didn't choose randomly?
I presented a case for who I thought she would choose IF she handpicked (which was everyone but newbs) but no where did I state that I thought that was the case.
I've been acting under the assumption that every role was chosen at random and Lab confirmed that.
I presented a case for who I thought she would choose IF she handpicked (which was everyone but newbs) but no where did I state that I thought that was the case.
I've been acting under the assumption that every role was chosen at random and Lab confirmed that.
U sure? Then i have no idea where it came from, maybe you made it sound that way? Hmm. Thats confusing.
