Mafia 73: Werewolf Game!

Hey, Rocker...are you going to play this game or are you just going to continue to post BS then a last minute vote?
 
aww don't believe her. She is only having to get up at like 4am to go to the hospital for like 12 hours a day and then she only has like 4 journal articles to read every day along with just a few papers to prepare for rounds the next day. It's prolly only like 16 hours of work each day. No biggie :laugh:
Ok, I have to ask....how do you know Lab's schedule so well?
 
Chill, it seems to me that the question you need to answer for yourself is what would you rather trust to place your vote: the best two cases that I've seen presented for scum (ie. Labby and Zaffy), or vague suspicions of what you would do "if" you were a wolf?

If you're not a wolf, then who cares what you would do if? If you are a wolf, then you're obviously lying. One way or the other, statements of "what I would do if" are irrelevant.

Fact is, there are a lot of reasons that the wolves may not have hit Kash: she may have had protection for the same reason she would make a good target, she was on to something d1 and it would have implicated a wolf or two, the very fact that we're having this discussion; and on and on and on. Do you have a better case on anyone? Have you seen anyone else present a better case on anyone?

I've noticed that you seem to like to start discussions this game on subjects that we can't really settle until after the game: why did they hit Wiz; Why did Kash not get hit. Seems to me like trying to start a lot of WIFOM :bs:. Not a good look, dude.

Seems a simple call to me.
Had to pull this quote for a statement in it..although, I do agree "what if" gets us no where. We now know Kash was NOT on to anything D1, so we know that was not the reason she wasn't taken by the wolves. Personally, I do not see the "she may of been protected" thing...mainly because there would be a good chance she wasn't, and as I said before there really wasn't a huge risk for the wolves if they did go after her and she was protected. We still would of lost an innocent (due to lynch) and they would of had a good chance to take out a player that could be dangerous to them. Then there is the flip side to that also though, that can't be overlooked...the fact she wasn't on to anything could work well for them as most seem to "follow" her if they feel she is (on to something).

This post also brings a question to Chill for me, why were you so interested in Kash's opinion of the bite? I know you posted it to all, but you really asked Kash over and over until she answered...just wondering why HER opinion was so important to you?
 
so i need to apologize apparently in my drunken drunkeness i posted something that was "rude", can't exactly remember what i said but it was enough to be "rude" so if there is a posting that was edited or deleted that wasn't by choice. ssorry to all who were offended by it.
 
so i need to apologize apparently in my drunken drunkeness i posted something that was "rude", can't exactly remember what i said but it was enough to be "rude" so if there is a posting that was edited or deleted that wasn't by choice. ssorry to all who were offended by it.
I saw nothing, and I forgive you......IF you get rid of the WW!!!!:D
 
AquariaCentral.com