Mafia 73: Werewolf Game!

[jm1212]

Yes, i have voted for both lynchings, but that was simply rotten luck. both Zaffy and Pappy, at the time, looked the scummiest to me. Not voting for them would be a disservice to the town. UN jumped around both nights so far, voting for me and then you, Lady G. now i think you would consider yourself innocent. Night two, he voted for Kashta, Piranha, and you once again. I consider Kash to be an innocent. even just considering both of you, he has voted for two innocents as well.

that also brings up something else. UN hasn't been able to find a resting place with his votes, and no doubt he will change again before nightfall Monday. He is fast to jump on someone that is in the spotlight for that moment and looks like they'll have a long train on them, but then switches to someone else that isnt even close to being in the running for a lynch, almost like he is trying not to attract attention.

In fact, Lady G, your voting behavior looks to be much the same as his, especially on night two. Night one you had a very safe vote on Rocker who wasnt really playing at that point anymore. Night two, though, you switched around ALOT. You voted for LR, Zaffy, and then eventually took the easy way out and voted for UN, who also wasnt even close to being in the running for a lynch, and in this switch you were trying to "make something happen," as in create a tie without getting your hands dirty. You started out second in voting an innocent (this is all according to FF's vote counts), then switched to the risky third vote on LR. then, you decided you wouldnt create any attention for yourself and moved to UN, who at that point did not have any votes.

Had to fix that

 

[Fishfriend1]

Well, it 12:30 AM where i live, i need to get some sleep cause im getting up a 6 fer a bike ride. I still want all those Tags gone by tomorrow, so if the people who put them there can remove them that would be a nice thing to see when i check in...

Good Night ACville!

 

[Lady G]

Yes, i have voted for both lynchings, but that was simply rotten luck. both Zaffy and Pappy, at the time, looked the scummiest to me. Not voting for them would be a disservice to the town. UN jumped around both nights so far, voting for me and then you, Lady G. now i think you would consider yourself innocent. Night two, he voted for Kashta, Piranha, and you once again. I consider Kash to be an innocent. even just considering both of you, he has voted for two innocents as well.

that also brings up something else. UN hasn't been able to find a resting place with his votes, and no doubt he will change again before nightfall Monday. He is fast to jump on someone that is in the spotlight for that moment and looks like they'll have a long train on them, but then switches to someone else that isnt even close to being in the running for a lynch, almost like he is trying not to attract attention.

fact, Lady G, your voting behavior looks to be much the same as his, especially on night two. Night one you had a very safe vote on Rocker who wasnt really playing at that point anymore. Night two, though, you switched around ALOT. You voted for LR, Zaffy, and then eventually took the easy way out and voted for UN, who also wasnt even close to being in the running for a lynch, and in this switch you were trying to "make something happen," as in create a tie without getting your hands dirty. You started out second in voting an innocent (this is all according to FF's vote counts), then switched to the risky third vote on LR. then, you decided you wouldnt create any attention for yourself and moved to UN, who at that point did not have any votes.

Nice try JM.
No body (besides the WW) know who is innocent, you stated he had the record for voting innocents... in fact he voted ppl you are saying you THINK are innocent. You however DID vote innocents both nights. I am well aware of the fact he voted me, no on besides myself and the WW know what I am, so in YOUR OPINION he voted innocents, in MY opinion from what I know he has voted ONE innocent, there is no fact behind that statement. You through the statement out there, knowing YOU have in fact voted two KNOWN innocents. My point is, you really shouldn't be pointing fingers at others for things you THINK they have done when you have actually DONE it.

As far as his jump voting, yep THAT is a fact and THAT is something that has raised red flags along with the statements in the votes. Although, how in the world would that NOT bring attention to him?

Night one, my vote was on Rocker (another FACT)...along side my vote was your "innocent" Kash, who had made alot of noise about Pap and Zaff, but her vote landed next to mine, not on either of the 2 she kept talking about. I didn't see a reason really to vote Pap or Zaff, so why would I? Rocker looked scummiest to me, and he still looks very scummy, and I'm sure until he is gone he will continue to look that way, he is just a distraction to the town and really needs to go IMO.
Night two, of course I moved my vote (which btw went from ZAFF to LAB...not the other way) I saw reason to doubt my vote and I moved it, as things progressed I wasn't liking my vote where it was on Lab either..and it accomplished exactly what I thought it would, it shows Kash REALLY wasn't behind her "lets make a tie, I don't care who goes" theory. How in the world can you say I thought I wouldn't draw attention to myself by switching?? That's just dumb, of course I knew it would draw attention, how would it not, I broke a tie up that Kash really wanted. So what, I wasn't about to leave my vote on someone I was having doubts about being WW, rather it drew attention to me or not.

 

[Lady G]

as for why JB that's a hard one
If LR is innocent then why would the wolves take someone doing their job for them?
If LR is guilty it sure looks bad that he was hit so it could be a setup, or it could be worth the risk to get rid of him especially since the town would probably buy the set up theory.
On the other hand if Kash is guilty then it doesn't appear to make sense to take out an innocent who's doing her dirty work, but she would know she was going to look bad today, and taking out JB sets up LR and muddies the water.

I think this was a tough calls for the wolves as FF was still looking for PM's 5 minutes before nightfall.

Chill, the PM's could of been from the good side also..the WW are not the only ones who need to send in PMs.

 

[Kashta]

Long day and very busy. Still catching up on what I've missed, but I've pulled a few posts I thought were puzzling. So I'll start there.

 

[Taysius]

My internet crashed last night so I wasn't able to get on. I just ran very quickly over what I missed now since some jerk woke me up with fireworks at 3am. Going to go over it better come morning but I need to point out that FF forgot my vote. Post 787.

 

[Kashta]

Ok just thinkin out loud here. We have.....

Tay
Lab
G
Kash
Chill
JM
Pirana
Rich
User
Dag
Rocker

Of these we know at LEAST two and could be up to four (IMO) are WW. Looking at the bites so far, I would think it is safe to say a Vet that knows who would be the biggest threats to them has to be on that team. I'm just trying to think, who would find Wiz and JB a bigger threat then Kash. I really don't buy the "they thought she was protected" thing, I would think she would be a big enough threat they would at least try early in the game, before she got a chance to get on them. Although, there is the fact they may figure we would think about something like that and by leaving her in, it makes her look suspicious...especially if she has been off on her accusations. See this is why I hate trying to think "why" it mixes me all up!

Lady G, you have a curious way of talking in circles. I sometimes wonder why you post these things when even you aren't sure what you're saying.

You make a valid (albeit argueable) statement.... which is immediately followed by a statement in complete contradiction to the point you just made..... then you're quick to say what you've just said doesn't amount to anything.

Do you do that on purpose, Lady G?

What exactly are we supposed to get from this, that you couldn't be evil because you appear to be confused? Or perhaps you think this may help to confuse us?

 

[Kashta]

KASH, were are you with your head spinning long posts!!!!!

First, I needed a break from this game after going without sleep too many nights trying to figure out who the werewolves are. Since we have 3 days for this day instead of 2, I didn't see any harm staying off this blasted computer for a while.

Second, we intended to do a few things today but (zombie) Wizard and I ended up bringing home another (second) iguana that we didn't intend to get.

The lizard is a sweet, tame, but sadly malnourished and disfigured fellow.... we've named him Drachen. We've also spent most of the day/night (re)building a large enclosure for him. The pitiful cage he's been in all this time accounts for the injuries he's had. And it's not safe for him to go back into it until we rebuild it. It's after midnight now and we're still finishing that up.

I'm back now to start catching up again.

PS... writing all those long posts mine makes my head spin too. :yuck:

PPS... the name of the iguana we already had is... ahem,.... Bala. Anyone care to guess where THAT came from?

 

[jbradt]

PPS... the name of the iguana we already had is... ahem,.... Bala. Anyone care to guess where THAT came from?

The urbandictionary term for a really good basketball player?

:hitting:

 

[Lady G]

Lady G, you have a curious way of talking in circles. I sometimes wonder why you post these things when even you aren't sure what you're saying.

You make a valid (albeit argueable) statement.... which is immediately followed by a statement in complete contradiction to the point you just made..... then you're quick to say what you've just said doesn't amount to anything.

Do you do that on purpose, Lady G?

What exactly are we supposed to get from this, that you couldn't be evil because you appear to be confused? Or perhaps you think this may help to confuse us?

Just posting thoughts, thinkin out loud. Never indicated anything about being innocent or evil.