Mafia #74...ACville Penitentiary!

So I got some time to get online.

Personally I do not really care if I am third on, but in an earlier game several people stated that typically the third on is almost always mafia..... I stated that because I fully expected to catch flack for it, but I did not vote there anyway....:huh: I know what role I have and I have nothing to hide......

noods, people only catch flack because they vote out an innocent and are the third vote. So that begs the question, did you know that Pir was innocent beforehand? What about 2H? Makes me wonder if you did...

I answered all of paps questions, and I don't recall you questioning me...

Yay! I get to use the sparkly words!

 
oooooh shiny
 
Not moving yet car show this week moving, hopefully, at the end of the month.



I will speak from my experience with you only. I posted last night, seconds after you accused me of knowing too many words. You answered Jpap's post and then disappeared.



This is one of the things I'm talking about. In stead of defending yourself you try to point out how other people do the same thing. "But moooooooooom he did it tooo". Are you trying to deflect from yourself?
that because i went to sleep at a reasonable hour. i'll go back through the thread now.
 
So I got some time to get online.



noods, people only catch flack because they vote out an innocent and are the third vote. So that begs the question, did you know that Pir was innocent beforehand? What about 2H? Makes me wonder if you did...

http://www.sparklee.com


uuuuhhhh, no? OF COURSE NOT!! It never seems to matter what role a voter has, if an innocent is lynched everyone points their finger at the third voter. there was such a big "to do" about being the third voter on someone in one of the last games I played, (I think Kashta got into the specifics of it) that when I saw I would possibly be third, I expected to catch some crap for it. That is all. I think (type) out loud alot and it seems to get me in trouble...whatever. :huh:
 
uuuuhhhh, no? OF COURSE NOT!! It never seems to matter what role a voter has, if an innocent is lynched everyone points their finger at the third voter. there was such a big "to do" about being the third voter on someone in one of the last games I played, (I think Kashta got into the specifics of it) that when I saw I would possibly be third, I expected to catch some crap for it. That is all. I think (type) out loud alot and it seems to get me in trouble...whatever. :huh:

Speaking of which - who was the third voter on Pir?? Rich.....hhhmmmm. Better start 'splainin Rich! (JK) ;)
 
2H, I know this post was not directed at me, but I have to ask - what does JB coming after you right after he was turned have to do with this game/his play? The only turn in this game is the innocent that was selected last night. Did I miss something about scum getting turns?

I know noods, maybe that's part of MY problem. I guess I don't make myself as clear as I think I am.

I understand there are no turns this game, but he didn't come after me untill he was turned in that game. When he was innocent he seemed to understand me.

Like I stated yesterday I also didn't like that he SEEMED to be asking for info on several people, but yet cast his vote on me before even hearing from some of the others.

Don't you at least find it strange that when it looked like I wasn't the target tonight, he locked on you. Why do you think that was NOODS?

He doesn't care what innocent he gets? Your an easy target Noods, Ice made you that for him.

And now he wants everyone to think I know he's the hit. GIVE ME A BREAK !!! We all know it's a coin flip.

And while were at it. Lets talk about my scummiest post of the game (says JB) from yesterday. That's right I stuck my neck out for UN....by the way thanks for vote buddy.....I'm not going to cast my vote for someone I believe is innocent. Ice said he also believed UN was innocent last night. Guess JB missed that post.

I hope that is clearer Noods.
 
This is what struck me as odd.

It was just how cunningly the references to the other game were put into her post. I would have found it more innocent had she made a direct statement to the other game, but her blatant choice of wording makes it seem scummy.

she starts by going after Vixen for using terminology that coincided with last game. at this point i believe Labby had mentioned it was the werewolf game, but Bally sure seems to 'know' what was going on with last game pretty well.

Sorry if that quote thread doesn't work as planned.

For not reading the previous games FV uses very interesting choice of words that interestingly enough relate to the previous mafia-esq games. Seemed to be a strange coincidence IMO.

it's like the end of Minority Report....

Lamar Burgess: Listen, I'll tell you what I'll do. First thing Monday, I'll look over the Witwer evidence. And I'll have Gideon run the Containment files, see if anyone drowned a woman by the name of - what did you say her name was?
Lara Anderton: Anne Lively ... but I never said she drowned.

I would say the same thing about you...you've been using mafia-esque words as well (in later posts) but you still keep referencing that she made the connection.

Alludes to some sort of insider information, whether it be from the warden or her fellow scum. Also if she didn't read the previous game, how did she know what to reference in the way she had. Unless she is communicating with someone else who was active in the other games.

Her other posts seemed very muddled, bidirectional and intentionally vague and misleading.

how would you know that it alludes to insider information?

This seems as if someone is whispering in your ear..... So now mimicking votes instead of thinking on your own? Group mentality perhaps?

If you didn't read the last game how did you know that what you said was a reference to it? Who's telling you these little tidbits?

both of these posts keep referencing to being on a team. the way it is worded though made me look twice.

Not moving yet car show this week moving, hopefully, at the end of the month.



I will speak from my experience with you only. I posted last night, seconds after you accused me of knowing too many words. You answered Jpap's post and then disappeared.



This is one of the things I'm talking about. In stead of defending yourself you try to point out how other people do the same thing. "But moooooooooom he did it tooo". Are you trying to deflect from yourself?

Ok, so maybe it wasnt so much the words you were using, but the way in which you were posting. something about your posts just doesnt seem right to me
 
Just to get it out of the way in case my internet gets stupid or something...

I vote to shank JM

Weak cases, only seems to be going after noobs, what JB brought up in post 868.
 
AquariaCentral.com