Mafia #74...ACville Penitentiary!

So because he says something ridiculous you want to move your vote off of him? DD, I don't get it...
it was tongue and cheek, Labby... however, if you want me to explain the comment, it was simply because Pir's behavior has changed (and I am thinking it's changed quite drastically), does not necessarily mean that he is automatically assumed innocent. With using that frame of thought (of him being innocent because of the behavior change), anyone that would be with him as an evil would warn him against such a ludicrous idea.

However, still with this frame of thought, that just could be the tactic... to explain this, to indicate that no evil would say it's a good idea to post the thought...if playing smart... in other words... trust no one, trust no action as innocent.

and just to note... I said I "almost" want to... I never said I would
 
Alludes to some sort of insider information, whether it be from the warden or her fellow scum. Also if she didn't read the previous game, how did she know what to reference in the way she had. Unless she is communicating with someone else who was active in the other games.

Her other posts seemed very muddled, bidirectional and intentionally vague and misleading.
Bally, I'm confused here...Vix said she didn't read and therefore wasn't trying to reference another game. What makes you think she actually was?

I agre with Lab, it seemed a bit odd using those words, but from Vix's words herself she didn't intentionally try to reference anything. It just seems a bit much to think that someone actually told Vix to say that to Lab. Doesn't make sense as to why they would.

Care to comment on anyone else that is up for the lynch? You've mentioned that Jm could have slipped, but what do you think about UN or 2H?
 
Not much change over a whole real time day....I think we could make a case for just about anybody right now with the day one crap shoot posts.....

Not sure I understand your switch to DD, Ice...
 
it was tongue and cheek, Labby... however, if you want me to explain the comment, it was simply because Pir's behavior has changed (and I am thinking it's changed quite drastically), does not necessarily mean that he is automatically assumed innocent. With using that frame of thought (of him being innocent because of the behavior change), anyone that would be with him as an evil would warn him against such a ludicrous idea.

However, still with this frame of thought, that just could be the tactic... to explain this, to indicate that no evil would say it's a good idea to post the thought...if playing smart... in other words... trust no one, trust no action as innocent.

and just to note... I said I "almost" want to... I never said I would

So basically your idea behind Pir being evil is because of some reverse psychology game he is playing?
 
Really guys? Skim much? Its like 3 posts above her vote.

It's a good habit to post the reason right by your vote. Makes it easier for everyone to reference.

It was less of a attack and more of a reminder. Just an unwritten rule.
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by FishVixen
Reading through all of the posts again. I'm finding it strange the tag team between Lab and Pappy. Sort of like a pack of wolves that would not give up. I admit the JM and UN is a bit uncanny but to be dogged like that. So MY VOTE IS LAB RAT.
Good for you, you read the last game. But this is Mafia #74, it is no longer the werewolf game. Are you trying to subconsciously influence peoples thoughts about my role this game by using three things from last game in this post ("tag team", "pack of wolves", "dogged")? Last game has absolutely no bearing on this game.


Sorry if that quote thread doesn't work as planned.

For not reading the previous games FV uses very interesting choice of words that interestingly enough relate to the previous mafia-esq games. Seemed to be a strange coincidence IMO.

it's like the end of Minority Report....

Lamar Burgess: Listen, I'll tell you what I'll do. First thing Monday, I'll look over the Witwer evidence. And I'll have Gideon run the Containment files, see if anyone drowned a woman by the name of - what did you say her name was?
Lara Anderton: Anne Lively ... but I never said she drowned.
 
Not much change over a whole real time day....I think we could make a case for just about anybody right now with the day one crap shoot posts.....

Not sure I understand your switch to DD, Ice...


Her whole argument is WIFOM.

She actually explained it pretty well.

it was tongue and cheek, Labby... however, if you want me to explain the comment, it was simply because Pir's behavior has changed (and I am thinking it's changed quite drastically), does not necessarily mean that he is automatically assumed innocent. With using that frame of thought (of him being innocent because of the behavior change), anyone that would be with him as an evil would warn him against such a ludicrous idea.

However, still with this frame of thought, that just could be the tactic... to explain this, to indicate that no evil would say it's a good idea to post the thought...if playing smart... in other words... trust no one, trust no action as innocent.


and just to note... I said I "almost" want to... I never said I would

So because he is more active it might be a cover to his low activity as evil last game so by being more active we won't think he is evil again. But if coached they would tell him to not do it that way but maybe they did to throw us off..

There is more to go on then that with other suspects voted on. I find it to be weak even for Day 1. I also didn't like that my suspect list was 3 newer players. 1 or 2 could be but I feel a vet needs to be behind them. DDs post was the scummiest I've seen vet wise.
 
So basically your idea behind Pir being evil is because of some reverse psychology game he is playing?
not at all, my reaasons have already been posted... did you miss them?
 
Sorry if that quote thread doesn't work as planned.

For not reading the previous games FV uses very interesting choice of words that interestingly enough relate to the previous mafia-esq games. Seemed to be a strange coincidence IMO.

it's like the end of Minority Report....

Lamar Burgess: Listen, I'll tell you what I'll do. First thing Monday, I'll look over the Witwer evidence. And I'll have Gideon run the Containment files, see if anyone drowned a woman by the name of - what did you say her name was?
Lara Anderton: Anne Lively ... but I never said she drowned.

This is interesting because FV has identified herself as having training in psychology. Who's words were the 2nd part of your quote Bally?
 
AquariaCentral.com