Mafia #75... Assassins in the Palace - The Play

[dirtydawg10]

Did you really warp her wording Dawg?

Thats sad. If you are a gaurd you shouldn't need to warp otherws wording to incriminate them, thats just scummy.

Read it for yourself and let me know.

 

[Lady G]

Here...let's see if you can follow this FF.

I made the following statement after knowing what User was because JB had already told us.



LG then says this...



Implying that I knew something the rest of you didn't. We all knew what User was at that point. Get it? LG was implying that she didn't know what User was but I did.





Take a look G...JB was the next post after the post I responded to. In that next post we all found out what User was. Sorry I didn't answer during those 13min. or whatever it was between the 2 posts.

Nope, didn't IMPLY I didn't know what User was at that point. Just saying what it looks like to me :grinyes:

 

[rich311k]

Ok, I was just kinda feeling bad for them if it was their first game...could you imagine THIS set up as your first OMG!


Hmmm, ok Dawg...you say this as if you KNOW who is a guard? IMO, there is only ONE person who would know that and that would be the assassin, because know one else knows anything except who the King is.

Everyone is a guard except the King and the assassin. A lynch victim is either going to be the assassin or a guard. I dont under stand this statement at all.

 

[Fishfriend1]

Here...let's see if you can follow this FF.

I made the following statement after knowing what User was because JB had already told us.



LG then says this...



Implying that I knew something the rest of you didn't. We all knew what User was at that point. Get it? LG was implying that she didn't know what User was but I did.





Take a look G...JB was the next post after the post I responded to. In that next post we all found out what User was. Sorry I didn't answer during those 13min. or whatever it was between the 2 posts.

I think she meant b4 nightfall. Obviously everyone knows about his role now.

 

[dirtydawg10]

You pulled a post from the old game saying it was more what you were trying to say:
"The way I see it, we have the advantage here. We (the guards), all know who the king is. The fact that there is a vast majority of us means that the king is in no danger of being lynched. The only people the assassin can trick the rest of us into killing are guards. Since we all agreed to die for the king when we took the job, means that it doesn't matter if we get tricked, as long as we don't do something to give the king away: like never voting for him.


What I'm trying to say is appropriately placed votes and retractions for the king may actually be a clever way to help shield that person. I will not suspect anyone for voting for the king. "

These two posts actually look to say the opposite of each other IMO. You posted in YOUR post that we should not make lists, or mutli-votes (pretty much) because it would out the king. The post you pulled actually say's there SHOULD be votes on the king to "hide" them. So which is it YOU actually think Dawg?

I think I made it pretty clear what my thinking is. We have to take every precaution not to out the King. Having 4 different candidates up on the block (spreading votes out) is not a good idea. Not voting for the King is also a big mistake. We just have to be careful not to put too many votes on the King when and if that happens.

 

[Lady G]

Everyone is a guard except the King and the assassin. A lynch victim is either going to be the assassin or a guard. I dont under stand this statement at all.

It's ok, I'll type slower for ya . Yes, everyone is going to be guard or assassin, ONLY the assassin knows which they will show.

 

[Taysius]

Feel free to disagree that's your perogative. I guess you would rather out another guard than vote this one out?

I would like to eliminate the assassin and User was just as good a candidate as anyone else with the exception of the King. Apparently 4 other people before me wanted to see User gone also. If no one has the balls to be the kill vote on someone this will be a long game. Feel free to vote for me for that if you like.

If you look back, I was one of the other 4 that had a vote on User. What I have been discussing with you has not been about User's lynching in particular. Its about your theory of someone being useless after be outed as not King by having 4 votes on them.

I don't even care that you were the 5th vote. Someone has to do it. Once again this is about your reasoning. It really seemed as though you were quite comfortable with him being dead. It was like you voted him as not the King, not as the assassin.

 

[dirtydawg10]

Nope, didn't IMPLY I didn't know what User was at that point. Just saying what it looks like to me :grinyes:

You didn't know what User was after JB had already told us????????????

I think she meant b4 nightfall. Obviously everyone knows about his role now.

I didn't say I knew what User was before nightfall.

It really helps to read all the posts in this game. This really is laughable.

 

[Lady G]

I think I made it pretty clear what my thinking is. We have to take every precaution not to out the King. Having 4 different candidates up on the block (spreading votes out) is not a good idea. Not voting for the King is also a big mistake. We just have to be careful not to put too many votes on the King when and if that happens.

Ok, Dawg...glad you see it as "clear". Even though the two post pretty much say completely different things

 

[Fishfriend1]

This is getting stupid. In my opinion you have misinterpreted LG or purposely tried to discredit her and now, between the 2 of you, you have blown it out of proportion. i will refrain from becoming any more mixed up in this for now.