Mafia #75... Assassins in the Palace - The Play

[rich311k]

Any chance for a vote Chill?

 

[Chill]

sure on anyone in particular?

 

[rich311k]

Nope, I can see the case of voting of the low posters, I can see the case against dawg. Not sure of anything.

 

[rich311k]

second of should be off

 

[Chill]

Let's go low poster
I vote to lynch Raz
care to finish him off Tay

 

[dirtydawg10]

Alrighty, so I got back from vaca earlier than expected so I'll be able to play more now. As for a way to win the game I have to think about that one. I didn't play the last game like this so it's confusing but I do agree with some of the ideas put out there like not letting the king get 4 votes and not spreading out too thin. So going off that I think we need to discuss who we are thinking of lynching without placing votes until we all (or most of us) agree on a single person.

To put a name out there I think Dawg might be scrambling to draw attention to other people. When the "mess" with LG didn't work out in Dawg's favor they jumped on me to make me the leader in votes. Dawg also read my post that I was on vaca but still seems to think I am trying to hide by not posting when the facts arethat between DC and then Hershey, PA, there isn't much time to get on the internet and read pages of finger pointing.

It's not just that you're not posting...it is also the fact that you have not posted any substance in your posts. If you had 5 substantive posts things would be different. Who is "they"?

 

[RazzleFish]

It's not just that you're not posting...it is also the fact that you have not posted any substance in your posts. If you had 5 substantive posts things would be different. Who is "they"?

They is my way of saying he/she/you. Sorry for the confusion but I don't know your gender and I didn't want to offend you by calling you something you aren't so I didn't specify.

 

[Lady G]

Lady G, i think you got it mixed up. By "the very next post" he meant the one right after your "crap" post. Maybe you are also mis quoteing him?

FF he used MY post about "the very next post" I was the one who said it not him. He used it and put it in a spot it didn't go as if I was saying it in reference to something I wasn't. You would have to go back and look how it really played out to see what I mean. Kinda like he did when I said I didn't imply I didn't know what User was...he took the "I didn't imply" out of my statement. This time he used my reply in a place it didn't go. I will try to show you what I mean...give me a sec.

 

[jbradt]

Current vote count:

Razz (4): Labby, Rich, Dawg, Chill
Dawg (2): LG, FF

5 votes needed to lynch.

 

[Lady G]

This is the post he was "questioning" me on.....

So LG...you obviously read my post as to why I think you're full of crap but the only comment you have to make is on the word crap itself and not why I think you're full of it. Do you still think I was typing at the same time JB was typing even though it was a full hour later? This brilliant theory is why you are still voting for me...lol...and all you have to talk about is my use of the word crap.

Here is where I said, you missed the post directly after it...referencing his post above....

Yep, thats it Dawg...you obviously missed the post directly after it. Naw, that's not the only reason I am voting you...there is plenty.

If you look back this is the post he was talking about in his "question" above..

Why would you put it "vote THIS one out"? Why not say User? I'm thinking maybe he was writing it as JB was writing. His post just happen to fall after JB's. The wording is just soooo wrong for a after knowledge post IMO.

Making THIS the post directly after the post he was questioning.

Or, before he read JB's post

Do you see what I am saying....he posted a question about something I said, then I replied you didn't see the post directly after it (the post he questioned me about), instead of posting the one that actually came AFTER the post in question...he chose to post a different one.