posting fluff, yes I am aware that it was day 1.
agrees with someone else, doesn't give her reasons just restates someone else's.
Because of the statement I expected to see more from you. Instead it's fluff posts.
is it that strange to put someone to the side if it was admitted to be based on " a weak reason "
more and more and more fluff
these posts were right after each other, more agreement. Still no original statements.
and more fluff.....
but there are quite a few posts between her quote to UN and her good night quote and she had NOTHING to say in between?
This post was over 300 posts after her good night post, in which the issues with FF were posted in a large number of them. What I don't get is how she knew that the town was all for voting for FF if she didn't and couldn't go back and read the posts?
Basically she has just fluffed up the chat, copied some opinions and has been around to vote. Very unhelpful IMO
I have to go double check who she voted on the first nightfall.
She said she might UD
Well Razz did say that his vote was based on the votes above, so I would assume that he/she (?) at least saw the vote count posted by Zaffy....
Not defending Razz at all, in fact he was one I wanted to look into, just calling 'em as I see 'em.
(is Razz a guy or a gal?)