Mafia #76 Game Thread: Revenge of the Nerds

It is not that hard to check a fact. Seems to me you were ready to start a case and guessed. That does not sit well. i would have gone back to check the voting before I started the case.

Well I'm sorry I didn't take the time to go back through the pages. If I am late or do not show to my appointments I can get put back in a clinic and I can't do that again. Trying to fix myself and it's not easy.
 
Well I'm sorry I didn't take the time to go back through the pages. If I am late or do not show to my appointments I can get put back in a clinic and I can't do that again. Trying to fix myself and it's not easy.
Going back through all of the pages is one of the most important parts of the game. you could miss something totally vital
 
I have plenty of time to do it now, and am in the process of doing that -multi tabbing for the win- i didn't have time then.....
 
neither did i...just seems odd that you would still list him as a suspect since he is you of the game without a doubt. having someone as a suspect implies that you are still willing to vote for him. you sure you saw that he was a definite UD? im not so sure that you did.


I only see it as relevant if PP shows jock. Then it could and should be construed as distancing.
 
I knew what you meant lol..Just stirring the pot a little..Reactions are better then words sometimes.

I'm glad you see what I see in Bally though.

What about her leaving you dawg and lab off her list? Protecting or setting up?

Assuming she would not put all her mates on the list. If she is guilty it is likely two or more not on her list are scummy. It is worth investigating that is for sure.
 
Going back through all of the pages is one of the most important parts of the game. you could miss something totally vital


LOL ....says the guy on the chopping block for mixing up names and building false cases.
 
Well I'm sorry I didn't take the time to go back through the pages. If I am late or do not show to my appointments I can get put back in a clinic and I can't do that again. Trying to fix myself and it's not easy.

You miss the point I would have looked before entertaining the thought. I would not have hurriedly tried to start a post pointing at some one if I had to be some where.
 
Assuming she would not put all her mates on the list. If she is guilty it is likely two or more not on her list are scummy. It is worth investigating that is for sure.

I agree, I doubt all 3 of you are jocks. Maybe 1, doubt she'd leave 2 team mates off.
 
LG being innocent has cleared lab in my mind. Lab and LG have played together often and Lab says LG has a tendency to protect scum and she didn't try to protect lab and LG came up innocent, and the tone was too light between lab and LG.

Dawg is getting more suspicious to me in the fact that he jumped on PP for learning how to multiquote so quickly and then flipped and protected him at one point.

Rich isn't that suspicious to me, last game when I played scum with him he was much quieter and this game he has been much more vocal.
 
Sigh....some very good points by several folks....my operation didn't go down today, so despite the pain will try to piece something together.

I definitely ID Lady G wrong.

I don't find Dawg's actions as unusual at all.

My experience has always been that Rich is quiet, scum or innocent. This change seems odd to me.

More reading to do between the Percocets....
 
AquariaCentral.com