:thumbsdown: i hear you. I've already stubbed my toe 50 flippin times today, and just got a CAE. For my 10 gallon. Its a community. And still cycling.:barf:
Mafia #76 Game Thread: Revenge of the Nerds
- Thread starter Zaffy
- Start date
:thumbsdown: i hear you. I've already stubbed my toe 50 flippin times today, and just got a CAE. For my 10 gallon. Its a community. And still cycling.:barf:
I'm watching you Bally, trying to tag onto LadyG and fly back under the radar.
Not no more.
Who is teaming up now?
Ice, you're right. Bally is trying to start someone and is on my list.
See next quote
Real quick to switch sides? First you defend me, then you suspect me :footinmouth:
Done and doner.
More to come now that I've learned the use of multi-quote.
For now on my list: Ballyhoo, jbradt, Lab_Rat, Razzlefish (no particular order).
one of your locker room buddies teach you that?
On another note I'm actually feeling the get Patrick thing is scummier than Patrick is. Seems like a good idea for the scum to keep him in the forefront after a blown up/not that scummy statement.
Im thinking someone in their that has brought Patrick back up if his name is not mentioned for a bit and has made little helper statements to keep people focused on him. Not sure who fits best have to go look this over again.
Demetri Martin! :headbang2:
Ok, so it seems that bunch of people jump onto pat, and then he shrugs it off with more of a non-sense post. That makes it sound to me like he is trying to go under the radar by not arguing or making a big case in his defense. IME when I'm innocent I ALWAYS try as hard as possible to prove so, (and when I'm guilty:silly: too but thats a different story entirely) Anyways, I find it strange that he has gotten so many votes so quickly. Would hate to see him turn innocent, but for lack of better suspects I vote to lynch pat
If pat shows up tonight and makes a good case against some other players then he might prove himself innocent. Do you have anything to say for yourself pat?
Thank you tay. My questions is the same, who do you suspect? (question is still to pat, not you tay)
I agree, DD and Rb aren't high posters at all.
so you point fingers at LG but don't provide any suppourting evidence? Any posts in particular that strike your attention?
mg:SPELLING FAILS!
cough FF cough cough
Agree 100%, its very hit or miss with the voting on D1.
I agree JM, i would like to see these posts he is refering too.
No objections here, unless Pir was a jock. Then I have issues....
Veeery interesting.... I'm not used to this style of play out of rich, you tend to have short (but meaningful) posts, but they are ussually very spread out across the whole game. It seems like you are much much more active this game, and for that I'm going to keep an eye on you.
this made me think a little bit...haven't seen you scrambling to prove your innocence this game UN, and if i recall two games ago you were pretty erratic.
For all the other geeks out there, if I go tonight, remember the people who brought me down and there is your hitlist.
It is a little early for the death speech. Wait till about an hour before nightfall and then really sell it.
I vote to lynch UN. That last post was a classic defense post of his.
Pat, if you go back to the posts you quoted in post 223 (Mine and Lab's) you will see that we both were refering to the post made by Rich that said "Why are you defending JB?" You get yourself in a pickle, ignore questions, make false statements and twist posts. I vote to lynch Pat.
And to that, Rich said:jbradt and I are just finally able to let our true colors show
Then here you said something about using the buddy system, and I said:
Then JB:
You:
Jm:
And so the list is made!
Why are you defending JB?
How do you know JB is a geek?
Do you want JB to be judged by your latching on to him?
