Mafia #76 Game Thread: Revenge of the Nerds

[Lady G]

Uhh, that's exactly what happened. I joke voted for him and retracted it later. How can you possibly say that it is anti-town with that rationale when the vote had been retracted?

No, it's a pretty silly observation as the avatar and title were changed well in advance of the initiation of the game. Plus, I'm not that retarded to give away a role with something like that. The California King Snake and me being king in that game was total coincidence.

IDK, the sky would fall, the world would be over, it would suck for the town. Pick your choice. I'm going to go with it would suck for the town, but I'm voting with who I feel has been scummiest at this point in the game.

Aww thanks LG, you just confirmed my geek status with that vote! Now, please tell me who you think is innocent. :thumbsup:

:headbang2:

 

[Lab_Rat]

WOW Pap, you are really, REALLY trying to defend them aren't ya!

The problem with that though Pap, the assassin was the ONLY one who didn't know who she was, no need to drop a hint

Exactly, it was total coincidence. Can we move past the avatar/title thing?

She had explained it to me but I already knew that she voted lady g because she was trying to get labby to mover her vote. In her voting post, she even said she was giving g what she wanted. I just thought it was strange because I don't know labby to just switch over to someone because they seem to be asking for a vote, espcially with someone with a track record like G(no offense) . That said, no matter which way you put it, she totally dodged my question as to what happens if g is lynched and turns innocent.

For the last time, I switched to LG because her behavior struck me as scummiest, not because she wanted me to. Just because LG has a track record of picking scum for innocents doesn't mean that she can't be scum herself. I didn't totally dodge your question, your posts and making me repeat myself has given me a headache. All you're doing is muddying the waters, there is nothing helpful that I can discern from any of your posts. Here, let me give you something else to not understand...I retract my vote on LG and I vote to lynch JM. You're doing nothing to help the town, only posting to confuse from what I can tell. That is not pro-town whatsoever.

 

[jpappy789]

Oh well, you just seem really bent out of shape over the fact I called Labby out on it. Oh, and btw I never said anything to Chill about it, so i don't know why you keep throwing his name in there like I did.

Yep, you stayed focused on Lab and didn't blink an eye when Chill did the exact same thing later.

To be honest, not sure why I threw his name in there but thanks for bringing me to a point...

why didn't you go after chill?

 

[Lady G]

Good point, but I'm still trying to figure out why you would think she would attempt to make people think that she was a jock.

I thought we'd outgrown trying to use avatars and such as a means of finding scum

You may find it to be defending Lab, but I'm not. I'm trying to sort through all the BS that keeps being posted.

Then quit posting the BS. Just because I called Labby out on her vote on Ice and gave her a hard time, you started this whole drawn out BS match. I was giving her a hard time for doing it SO FLIPPING WHAT, it really wasn't a big deal and I didn't vote or call her scummy for doing it, I went back and forth teasing her about not being able to turn down a dare...it really wasn't much of anything, YOU decided to turn it into something

 

[Lady G]

Yep, you stayed focused on Lab and didn't blink an eye when Chill did the exact same thing later.

To be honest, not sure why I threw his name in there but thanks for bringing me to a point...

why didn't you go after chill?

Because I didn't feel like it

 

[Lab_Rat]

nope the joke vote caught my attention, I had stated earlier that I would be watching who you switched your vote to.
I think it's more of people having a hard time believing it, I think everyone here is intelligent enough to understand the concept of a joke
hind sight is always 20/20. From what I have seen though you aren't one to say something without valid evidence.
tomato/tomato.....I'm a browns fan:eek3:

Yeah, and now I've switched my vote again...

Not sure what you're referring to with the "valid evidence" thing. I can back up everything I've posted and why. I backed up my voting. Tell me this, if my vote were still on Ice, what would you be saying then?

OMG, Who Dey is TOTALLY different than Who Dat...totally different. And the Browns...:barf:

 

[Lab_Rat]

Ok, I'm off now. Not sure if I'll get back on before nightfall, so JM, you can accuse me of dodging all you want.

 

[Zaffy]

Yeah, and now I've switched my vote again...

Not sure what you're referring to with the "valid evidence" thing. I can back up everything I've posted and why. I backed up my voting. Tell me this, if my vote were still on Ice, what would you be saying then?

OMG, Who Dey is TOTALLY different than Who Dat...totally different. And the Browns...:barf:

I'm sorry, I need some clarification.

Does a football team seriously use "Who Dey" as a rally cheer? and does another football team seriously use "Who Dat"?

 

[Lady G]

Ok, I let myself get caught up and carried away...I retract my vote on Lab

 

[jm1212]

Exactly, it was total coincidence. Can we move past the avatar/title thing?


For the last time, I switched to LG because her behavior struck me as scummiest, not because she wanted me to. Just because LG has a track record of picking scum for innocents doesn't mean that she can't be scum herself. I didn't totally dodge your question, your posts and making me repeat myself has given me a headache. All you're doing is muddying the waters, there is nothing helpful that I can discern from any of your posts. Here, let me give you something else to not understand...I retract my vote on LG and I vote to lynch JM. You're doing nothing to help the town, only posting to confuse from what I can tell. That is not pro-town whatsoever.

You stated in your voting post you were giving her what she wanted. There were other reasons as well, but to me it looked like you were just voting for her because she asked it.

And yes you did totally dodge my question in the beginning. You tried to be sly and try to answer my question with your own.

So according to you, I shouldn't call out something that looks suspicious to me? I thought I was supposed to ask questions about what I thought was odd? Didn't you just try to tell me you thought LG's behavior was scummy so you asked questions and ultimately voted for her because of it? Yes, you did. But now that I'm questioning you, you're getting all ruffled up about just simply explaining your vote and answering some of my questions. If they really were stupid and meaningless like you are trying to sell, then they should have been easy to answer without a single second thought. That's why I think you have something to hide after all.