hmmm...im really torn about this issue. on one hand, he could be telling the truth, but IME it is just as easy to lie about it after a huge event. no offense to Pir, but right now im not ready to take the bait. im going to go on my own suspicion, and know that i'll be watching you closer, Pir. im not saying i am going to vote for you tonight, but know that i am going to be looking through your posts more carefully.
im not buying your reason for investigating Haydn, since im not really seeing the whole coaching thing. plus, IMO, there are plenty of others playing that can be much more dangerous to the town if they are scum then a new guy that barely posts. all i am saying is that usually people look to the vets to investigate first.
im really not liking this, JB. something about it just isnt sitting right with me. i know you said your explanation was vague, and it was, but the whole case against rich just seems too foggy to me for you to be so sure. this is especially odd to me since you insist on voting rich despite the fact that you say you believe Pir, who has named Haydn as scum. this also leads me to my next quote...
why wouldnt you want to make sure that Haydn is lynched if he is really scum by putting your vote on him?
can't you still look for other mafia members even if your vote is on someone that is known to be scum by a person that just RC'd the detective? there is no rule that says you can't interrogate other people after voting.
ok, so maybe you are just looking for other more 'dangerous' people, but if rich and haydn are really both scum, why would it matter which one is lynched first? if you end up being the hit tonight, your trail will be left right to rich, so it would be easy for everyone to see that he was scum, and then tongiht we'd be sure we would get haydn and then rich tomorrow. it really looks like you don't want the vote trail leading back to you, and don't want to be looked at if Haydn does end up being innocent and Pir is lynched tomorrow and turns scum, which you may or may not know. that way, you can say you 'believe' pir now without totally binding yourself to him later.
i find this theory very interesting, UN.
