Mafia 78- The Gunslinger Returns...The Play

Maybe we could sway Lab into altering the rules a bit since we are having such a problem with people not participating. Though I'm not sure how to make it fair for both teams. I'd just hate to lose because too many people signed up and crapped out on us. One or two posts every 48 hours is BS.

I will say thank you to the people that kept themselves from signing up because they knew they wouldn't have the time.
 
Okay, after reading a bit JS jumps out at me. He states at three different occasions (cant multi quote cause on itouch) that you (chill) should shoot ice. Without any explanation. Then he suspects LG for some stupid wording problem then backpedals majorly when people jump on him...

Here's the most blatant quote about ice:

Since Chill turned out innocent I would shoot Ice.

Posted on mobile.aquariacentral.com

Now these three "shoot ice" posts were said before JP comes out and says ice is innocent through invest. JS in my mind was trying to build a case on an innocent because he is scum and now can't.

The other two I'm sus about is pirana and S4S because of lack of posting. It would be very easy for mafia to stay out of the spot light by laying low. Especially S4S cause he said he would post in a minute then never did... Very scummy. Now people will probably say to me that I've been a low poster and I have but I stayed earlier why; snow, golf and school assessment period.

So this is my input :)
 
Chill, is there any way you could list what you're asking from us? I'm having a bit of trouble grasping the bit about 3 names. I'd just like to be sure of what you're asking so I can give a proper answer. Sorry to be difficult!
 
He pasuses at the school house. He draws his revolver and removes all but one of the bullets. He gives the chamber a spin and enjoys the whir it makes in the quiet morning air.

Holstering his gun he picks up a piece of chaulk. His first stroke on the board makes a loud screech.

Today's homework town is to tell the gunslinger who you would shoot next and then follow that to it's logical conclusions: if that person should roll innocent, and if that person should roll guilty. So three names who you would shoot next, then who you would shoot if the first person is innocent, and who you would shoot if the first person is guilty. Kash I'd like your opinion as well. It's not a foregone conclusion that I will shoot you, there are a couple of considerations that I'm still weighing that might save you.

I would shoot Kash due to her "mistake" naming you as scum. I do not have two other names yet (other than the if innocent and if guilty names). If Kash was innocent then I would shoot rich because he seems to be allover scummy and it seems other people feel the same way. If Kash was guilty ten I would still shoot rich for the same reasons.
 
I would shoot Kash due to her "mistake" naming you as scum. I do not have two other names yet (other than the if innocent and if guilty names). If Kash was innocent then I would shoot rich because he seems to be allover scummy and it seems other people feel the same way. If Kash was guilty ten I would still shoot rich for the same reasons.

You say you don't have two other names but then you name Rich? :uhoh:
 
I would shoot Kash due to her "mistake" naming you as scum. I do not have two other names yet (other than the if innocent and if guilty names). If Kash was innocent then I would shoot rich because he seems to be allover scummy and it seems other people feel the same way. If Kash was guilty ten I would still shoot rich for the same reasons.

You say you don't have two other names but then you name Rich? :uhoh:

Please re-read the text that I bolded.
 
He pasuses at the school house. He draws his revolver and removes all but one of the bullets. He gives the chamber a spin and enjoys the whir it makes in the quiet morning air.

Holstering his gun he picks up a piece of chaulk. His first stroke on the board makes a loud screech.

Today's homework town is to tell the gunslinger who you would shoot next and then follow that to it's logical conclusions: if that person should roll innocent, and if that person should roll guilty. So three names who you would shoot next, then who you would shoot if the first person is innocent, and who you would shoot if the first person is guilty. Kash I'd like your opinion as well. It's not a foregone conclusion that I will shoot you, there are a couple of considerations that I'm still weighing that might save you.

I will take a stab at this. If I were to shoot right now I would shoot, LG. She has not sat well with me and has not been as active as I expect her to be.

If she came up innocent I would probably shoot Kashta as she is playing sloppy and making mistakes in her facts which is not like her. I find that mafia tend t5o be sloppier than innocents as they are really trying to prove anything anyway.

If LG came up mafia I would probably shoot Tay though I would still consider Kashta as well. tay has not been giving me a warm and fuzzy feeling, no real anything to her posts.

After all that I would shoot Pigs or one of the non posters. Pigs sudden mind changes are either odd or he is just following along. Both not good signs to me.
 
Chill, is there any way you could list what you're asking from us? I'm having a bit of trouble grasping the bit about 3 names. I'd just like to be sure of what you're asking so I can give a proper answer. Sorry to be difficult!


Okay something along the lines of if I was the shooter I would shoot Haydn next and if he turns up guilty I would shoot Tay, but if he turns up innocent I would shoot Rich. Naes used by me here are for purposes of illustration only and are completely random.

Of course some explantion for your choices would also be very useful.
 
Okay, *does his homework, submits it to teacher chill*

It reads:

"I would shoot JS on the post I just did (above) and my three suspects are JS, S4S and Pirana. Because of reasons stated in the previous post. I would shoot JS. If he came up innocent I would shoot S4S for saying he would post some help then never did and fir lying low. If JS was guilty I would jump in joy then look back through the thread for who had defended him"

:)
 
AquariaCentral.com