Morning all
Okay, to answer everyones question. By jumping on the train this is what I ment; Ff and wiz were talking last night and I came on and started to try help the town in my eyes. Then yes I said my theory was going to be lowish posters at the point. Then wiz and FF jump on me a bit about it and before I even had the chance to answer fully, rich comes on with his first or second post about the issue or that night for that matter and places a vote. Which i thought was unusual. That is also why I voted for him. I hope that clears that up a little.
So...
1) Essentially Rich jumps on you pretty much out of the blue
2) Wiz and FF had both been questioning you before hand ergo Rich was following those two
3) His vote happened before you were able to fully answer the questions.
Huh...I'm reading through the conversation now...none of what you say matches up with the timeline that was posted in the thread...
Since when have you been such a big quoter and informed player? Lol. I will be making my choice in the morning before school. I'm still undecided and looking for something unusual to happen. Personally all I see is banter. So till then I'm off to sleep

goodnight All.
Here is where you mention the whole banter things between Wiz and FF.
So nothing FF has posted or the responses by players discussing things with him seems to be anything but banter to you?
FF that was another excellent post. I imagine you are back on your meds as school is back in session. I do not have any problem believing that you wrote those posts. I am sure you slowed down and carefully wrote out and reread your posts before making them.
My dilemma is did you do so because you are a townie trying to help and explain yourself or are you the murderer being extra careful?
Rich questions what you said.
<snip>
Hay, you need to say something other then "I have nothing to say at this moment." You may as well just not post at all. If you had to come up with a vote, who would you vote for? Got any scum lists? Got anything at all? Cause im pretty sure whats been happening between me-n-wiz isn't all banter.
FF also does.
Okay, I can't sleep

yeah I saw his posts and they were a bit suspicious but nothing to vote off I beleive. Not yet. Although with that said, his inconsistency with his FF posts and his new, intelligent posts have me concerned.
Your response and explanation.
FF my above post answers some of your question and I'm still looking into my theory of lying low. So therefore I'm looking at noodes, rich etc who have low posts. But I want to hear some input from them before I vote.
You then bring up the low poster theory again.
Hay, your posts have been causing me some concern.
I have gone at FF knowing I would take a lot of flack and probably put myself in the running for the lynch. I am currently the 2-1 favorite to be brought before Bala and all you have seen is BANTER?
Maybe I am wrong about FF. I am not sure at this point thanks to your input.
Wiz mentions you looking suspicious to him. He specifically mentions the banter issue.
No, that's not what I ment. I ment FFs post about suspects straight away caused concern but then I thought he was just trying to help then when you started on him I saw it as a pointless case if you know what I mean. That's what I ment by banter, not that I'm not seeing anything to go by. Sorry for the confusion there.
Your answer to Wiz.
Speaking of lying low... how do you not fit the profile of lying low?
Then FF questions the lying low thing that you previously brought up.
Because I'm trying to help and I believe my post count shows that I'm trying to contribute.
You continue on the post count thing...
Do you not qualify for this? Do we get input from you?
I vote to take the soul of Haydn.
I do not like your posts this time around and you have done nothing while saying you are looking at people who you have decided have done nothing. Does not sit well with me.
Rich questions it and votes because of the low posters comment.
Post count does not indicate "helping". Content of posts indicates "helping"
Wiz corrects you on the post count issue.
Your going to vote based on that? That's kinda weak. You didn't even question me about it but fair enough.
Your response to Rich's vote.
Yes, I answered your questions and put out my theory and my suspects and all I get is slack so I dunno.
This is to Wiz. You answerED the questions.
Explain away. No vote is set in stone, well on day one anyway. You have been asked several times and have not said much or tell us how we should proceed, I always am welcome to a good idea.
Rich again.
I have already answered this. I have answered most or all questions, put out a theory and suspects. I'm trying to help the town and I'm just getting hammered. So I don't know anymore.
Your response...again you say you ALREADY answerED.
So...
1) You say that Rich followed FF and Wiz. Not entirely true. I see Rich being the first one out of the three to question your talk about the banter. Different reasoning but it's not like Rich just blindly followed them.
2) Again, you say that Rich was following FF and Wiz. Funny, because Rich posted/voted before Wiz even responded to what you said about low posters this morning.
3) You say that Rich jumped on without allowing you to answer all the questions. You specifically said following the vote when they continued to question you that you already answered their questions. When did you answer them? Apparently it had to be before Rich's vote since nothing in between that and when you insisted that you already answered was there any more reasons from you.
Heck, even when Rich asked you to explain (since you questioned why he didn't do it to you before voting) you shooed it away saying that you already had answered everything.
I vote to take the soul of Hay
Your extended reasoning for voting Rich makes less sense than what you originally stated when you voted.