Mafia 81: The Bloody Coup

[TwoHobbies]

FF, I wish you would have asked at the time I posted if you didn't understand my point.

First off it really makes little sense as quoted so go back and read it as my original post.
And let me add one more thing. I only quoted Lab, and Zaffy in my post because they were the dead innocents with comments about LG. Many more people were making comments about this that (at the time) I couldn't quote without giving up possible info on the president.

Pap made a comment (I believe) about Noods lynching being blatantly obvious. I usedhis comment to poke at Chill because Chill claimed he coundn't find anywhere better to place his vote the night before on LG, than on UN. Chill later claimed he just missed it.
Maybe he did, maybe he chose to miss it.
I then took the liberty to poke at Pap, because he didn't question Chill. If you check back through the thread you will see pap's best excuse this entire game has been he's having an off game, and should not have played.
I say he's not playing a OFF Innocent game, he's playing a normal (not great in my oppinion) Rebel game. That may be the point that was not clear to you.

I'll cover the second request in another post.

 

[TwoHobbies]

The second post was Pappy saying he thought we should ask about the investigations done by Lab. I believe he knew when he suggested this it would likely turn up useless info. That invest was from day one. I also had an invest on day one. Kash...She's innocent !!!! Is that information you can use today?

I believe Pap was hoping no one would call him on it. When I did, he quickly came back with a "good point" comment, like he didn't think of that!

I then made another, I know "bad game" comment.

 

[Fishfriend1]

FF, I wish you would have asked at the time I posted if you didn't understand my point.

First off it really makes little sense as quoted so go back and read it as my original post.
And let me add one more thing. I only quoted Lab, and Zaffy in my post because they were the dead innocents with comments about LG. Many more people were making comments about this that (at the time) I couldn't quote without giving up possible info on the president.

Pap made a comment (I believe) about Noods lynching being blatantly obvious. I usedhis comment to poke at Chill because Chill claimed he coundn't find anywhere better to place his vote the night before on LG, than on UN. Chill later claimed he just missed it.
Maybe he did, maybe he chose to miss it.
I then took the liberty to poke at Pap, because he didn't question Chill. If you check back through the thread you will see pap's best excuse this entire game has been he's having an off game, and should not have played.
I say he's not playing a OFF Innocent game, he's playing a normal (not great in my oppinion) Rebel game. That may be the point that was not clear to you.

I'll cover the second request in another post.

The second post was Pappy saying he thought we should ask about the investigations done by Lab. I believe he knew when he suggested this it would likely turn up useless info. That invest was from day one. I also had an invest on day one. Kash...She's innocent !!!! Is that information you can use today?

I believe Pap was hoping no one would call him on it. When I did, he quickly came back with a "good point" comment, like he didn't think of that!

I then made another, I know "bad game" comment.

Ok, thank you. From that i see your argument as being

A)Pappy has been "off his game" to much so far. Or "on his evil game". The issue i see with that is he is a better player then that, mostly.
B)Pappy wan't in the towns best interest when he posted his "lets get the invest" post. I can agree with that, but I honestly thought that was a good idea, so... yea.
C)Pappy tried the "good point" thing. I see that bit. Its not the greatest argument i've ever seen, but it's better then nothing.
D)Pappy didn't question Chill.

Ok, so thats your argument, summed up in 4 points, right? Its still not the greatest argument I've ever seen, but its the best one i've seen today. I can't come up with a better one, except on DD, and thats cause of her posting. So, in summary I vote to lynch Pappy and hope that your argument is correct.

Ok, so on my list right now:

Pappy: Just said why.
DD: being able to post a self defense but not being able to help the town.
Chill: On the list, was wrong about LG.
Dawg: Mixed up "guess" with "think", not like him to do that.

And thats what I've got, in order from most scummy (top) to least scummy (bottom)

 

[TwoHobbies]

Once an innocent gets lynched its game over since the scum can control the lynch. They dont need to kill you at all...they wont be voting for any one of themselves so Ice might as well call the game since the town would be outnumbered.

Hey Pap's THANKS for the info, but I assure you I do understand how the game works.

My response was to NPR about PIR's lynching last night when the numbers were 5-4, YOU, and YOURS didn't control **** at that time, and still don't.

 

[TwoHobbies]

Thank you for the that FF.
Now let me help you with you game and give you another example of a Rebel post.

Look at this post from Pappy, and ask youself.

A) was this post from one innocent to another, or
B) was this from a rebel to a innocent

Once an innocent gets lynched its game over since the scum can control the lynch. They dont need to kill you at all...they wont be voting for any one of themselves so Ice might as well call the game since the town would be outnumbered.

I try to read these a couple of times. Once, while thinking about who wrote them and then again replacing that name with innocent, or scum.

Sometimes it helps sometimes it doesn't.
What's your oppinion on this one?

 

[Fishfriend1]

Thank you for the that FF.
Now let me help you with you game and give you another example of a Rebel post.

Look at this post from Pappy, and ask youself.

A) was this post from one innocent to another, or
B) was this from a rebel to a innocent



I try to read these a couple of times. Once, while thinking about who wrote them and then again replacing that name with innocent, or scum.

Sometimes it helps sometimes it doesn't.
What's your oppinion on this one?

Well, for that post, its more of a fact then an opinion. If the CIA outnumber us, we're screwed. Big woop, they don't win till they kill the pres, so what. They control the lynch, they win, because they can just lynch innocents until they get the pres, and you don't die for the pres if the pres gets lynched. So, that post seems more defeatist then scummy to me. But if he is CIA then it may be to get the town to quit or give up easier then it should, or to get the town flustered.

 

[TwoHobbies]

I'd say that was pretty close, but there is a lot more in there that the writer is telling you that if the game continues you could use. Look at the line
they wont be voting for any one of themselves.

How could he know that?
I read that as maybe it's already been discussed, and the writer already seems to know what is going to happen tonight. I don't talk about it in the thread, but I do make a note of it, and watch to see if it comes true.

If I think it's important enough I bring it up in the thread, but you have to remember it could cause you some grief.
I also consider that in this case it went to a known innocent. I would have included something like "WE" can't let this happen, and here is what I think "WE" should do.
Notice how those things are missing?
Now you look at the fact that this post came from a very good player like Pap, and maybe you have a solid clue to his role.

 

[Chill]

Had a minute to get in and read, not much new here. Hopefully there will be something more when I get back this evening.

 

[jpappy789]

Hey Pap's THANKS for the info, but I assure you I do understand how the game works.

My response was to NPR about PIR's lynching last night when the numbers were 5-4, YOU, and YOURS didn't control **** at that time, and still don't.

All I said is that they don't need to hit you if they lynch an innocent tonight. Big whoop. It's true. There is no need for the scum for hit you IN THAT SITUATION. You act like I am pointing out the obvious...maybe I was, but at the same time you're acting like I just was telling you. Whatever I post is for everyone to see and perhaps others hadn't thought about it. Settle down...sheesh...

You may understand how the game works but that in no way means you know everything. It's frustrating that you've been on my *** since the beginning of the game taking whatever I say and spinning it to look evil when you have hardly actually taken one of my responses to what you have said about me and picked it apart to look at what happened and why I posted what I did.

I showed you multiple times why I said what I said on D1 regarding the teams...you eventually "conceded" after the umpteenth time...

I showed you the timing of the posts in regards to what I said about the LG-Noods connection, AFTER LG flipped FBI...yet you still point that out in your case against me...

And I have already pointed out to Chill that I, in know way, was afraid of any list coming out...yet you still point that out in your case against me...

Since you RCed I have spent way too much time trying to prove my innocence to you but no matter what I say it is scummy.

 

[jpappy789]

I'd say that was pretty close, but there is a lot more in there that the writer is telling you that if the game continues you could use. Look at the line
they wont be voting for any one of themselves.

How could he know that?
I read that as maybe it's already been discussed, and the writer already seems to know what is going to happen tonight. I don't talk about it in the thread, but I do make a note of it, and watch to see if it comes true.

If I think it's important enough I bring it up in the thread, but you have to remember it could cause you some grief.
I also consider that in this case it went to a known innocent. I would have included something like "WE" can't let this happen, and here is what I think "WE" should do.
Notice how those things are missing?
Now you look at the fact that this post came from a very good player like Pap, and maybe you have a solid clue to his role.

Are you seriously trying to tell me that after we hypothetically lynch an innocent that the CIA are going to turn on themselves and vote one of themselves off when they control the lynch presumably 4-3?

Take your flippin blinders off 2H and actually read and comprehend what I am saying. This is ridiculous...