Mafia 81: The Bloody Coup

[Chill]

Sorry Bally. Okay for the record FF it was Bally who was right.

 

[Chill]

Okay I may have posted my share of fluff but this is getting ridiculous. Fluffy posts about the amount of fluff. It's like little white kittens on soft fluffy clouds

achhh choooo!

 

[rich311k]

This was Pap's first post on the size of teams.



He states he doesn't see there being more than 3 per team, which at the time I found strange because I was sure the teams would have been four.
So I called him on it with my response.




Maybe it was a "slip", maybe he really doesn't remember. Time will tell.

That is awfully thin, almost non existent. I am not buying it.

I vote to lynch TwoHobbies.

 

[TwoHobbies]

Yes, you have been very helpful to the town. It appears to me with your post to JP the line not buying it Pap would sound definitive, as if you found something. Yet you let it drop after he answered and to DD you imply that you still see it as a slip.

With the attention FF drew to himself you made no comment as I thought earlier.

Yet you are going to call Bally for posting about Pizza toppings after that conversation was over. Hell I did the same thing when I was going through the thread Monday night. You didn't question me.

You state it is because of the time it took to make that post. How much time does it take to click the quote button while reading the thread? It takes more time and effort to do what I have done with this post.

It takes more time and effort to find a vid on yt and imbed it here. yet you don't say anything to Chill about the usefulness of his post.

The way I see it, 1) you wanted to do a little distancing from JP
2) you are trying to appear helpful to the town without being too visible so as to not draw attention to yourself.
3)you thought you might try to find an easier target than JP or anyone else that would draw you into the limelight.

I'm not really sure what you want from me Wizard. I see you have now placed your vote on me.
I guess it's somewhat telling that you think your vote is best cast on someone you agree has been very helpful to the town. IS that what you said?

As far as Pap goes I believe I MAY have found something....enough to place a early vote, no I don't believe so, if I had I would have voted. Maybe another day, but not today.

I also can't comment on how long it takes you, or Bally to put together a multi post like that. I need to go by how long it takes me to do it.

FF sure doesn't need my help getting lynched, and I usually don't put much game time into his posts.

Chill and Lab have also peaked my interest with there game play thus far. Bally just happen to be the one on line posting last night.

 

[Lady G]

This was Pap's first post on the size of teams.



He states he doesn't see there being more than 3 per team, which at the time I found strange because I was sure the teams would have been four.
So I called him on it with my response.

Maybe it was a "slip", maybe he really doesn't remember. Time will tell.

OK, 2H...why exactly were you "sure" there would be 4 on each team?

 

[Ballyhoo]

I'm not really sure what you want from me Wizard. I see you have now placed your vote on me.
I guess it's somewhat telling that you think your vote is best cast on someone you agree has been very helpful to the town. IS that what you said?

As far as Pap goes I believe I MAY have found something....enough to place a early vote, no I don't believe so, if I had I would have voted. Maybe another day, but not today.

I also can't comment on how long it takes you, or Bally to put together a multi post like that. I need to go by how long it takes me to do it.

FF sure doesn't need my help getting lynched, and I usually don't put much game time into his posts.

Chill and Lab have also peaked my interest with there game play thus far. Bally just happen to be the one on line posting last night.

Not exactly true 2H, Dawg and Noods both posted after me and before you questioned me. Zaffy had posted but his was about 15 minutes before me so he could have easily left before I posted.

Here are the two posts between my long post and your accusation.

I already said it but here it is again...from the quote you posted..."It was the only thing I saw at the time I voted that even remotely made sense for a vote."...and I voted because..."It was an attempt to get this game moving to actual game play rather than pizza topping discussions."

I have no need to get on anyone's good side. I saw the same thing she did but i just didn't say anything. I just wanted to confirm that I agreed it was a valid point.



It was screwed up...it's supposed to read like this..."True...no one knows for sure except the scum and those who posted the screwed up numbers."

So for example...JPap...The scum know for sure if JPap is scum or innocent and JPap himself knows if he is scum or innocent. I guess my logic was a bit off since there are 2 scum teams in this format so not all the scum will know.

Maybe so, but wasn't he the first foreigner to bring STD's to the Americas? :lipssealedsmilie:

 

[TwoHobbies]

You have made me feel better about my vote. JP said he wants to say there were at least 3.

You are expecting someone that admits he didn't check the previous game to remember the # of scum from game #9 when we are currently in #81?

Nice twist of his post by the way. :thumbsup:

It was subtle very well done.

I TWISTED IT....give me a break. When he said "at least 3" he was talking about game 9.
He then said "I dont see there being more than that this time around anyways."
Those are his EXACT quotes, so who is twisting posts Wizard!!

 

[noodles62]

OK, 2H...why exactly were you "sure" there would be 4 on each team?

Interesting question G!

I need to get caught up really quick......

 

[TwoHobbies]

OK, 2H...why exactly were you "sure" there would be 4 on each team?

Because Ice said the game was a 50/50 split and there were 17 signed up.

 

[Lady G]

Because Ice said the game was a 50/50 split and there were 17 signed up.

At the time of the post, there was nothing confirming that fact though?