1. That remains to be seen, doesn't it?
2. I did not say FF was a low poster; I said I wanted to look at his posts. His play seems a bit more restrained this game (with the exception of the banter w/ NPR). a restrained FF typically means one thing....
3. I was not the only one to point out that G was just acting like G.
4. There really is not much to make anything of/with. She has barely posted and when she does she just gloms onto someone else's case, votes and disappears again. I will say tho, the more she posts the more I think she is scum....
I never said FF was on a my scum list - I said I wanted to look at his posts. Am I not supposed to look at his posts because he gets rattled? I said I wanted to look at the low posters in the game, thus I pulled Pir's posts and he is not coming up smelling like roses; I already had my suspicions on UN and would like to pull his posts as well, but did not have the time today to do that yet.....
1. Still doesn't change the fact you were all for jumping on the bandwagon had 2H decided to make something of it. Have you still not read the exchange between us? You do know that you dont have to wait until your vote would hypothetically be placed, right? I don't see how an innocent can practically ignore the conversation and just say well if I would decide to vote I would read.
2. As I said, I can only see one common thread between the group you mention and it doesn't sit with me that your reasoning for looking at him was after the fact. Not to mention you specifically said this at the beginning of your case on Pir...
"Thought I would take a look at some of the low posters...Pir is first..."
and then this...
"...but I am not feeling really good about Pir right now....more later...I want to look at UN and probably FF as well..."
Maybe it was accidental but it clearly looks like you lumped FF and Pir/UN together based on posting alone.
And the whole thing about FF being restrained doesn't exactly fit with how I see FF posting. Sure, maybe his post count isn't as high as normal but I don't see anything remarkably different about how he is playing. Maybe you could point to some posts that make you feel that way?
3. That may be true but you're missing the point. You didn't exactly jump into that conversation and analyze anything for yourself, did you? You posted wishy washy comments and let it be.
4. Again, missing the point...that's just one more example of you throwing a vet's name out there not to mention that you told me it was JUST an observation which it clearly isn't.