Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

Even though I see Ricket as best vote right now, I would rather my vote count. Only one person hasn't voted as far as I see for this reason I retract my vote on Ricket and vote to lynch Nem. I really do not see a non-lynch being helpful in any way and see more reason for voting Nem then HH
 
I'm not liking HH's argument that it was a pm. ( can't pull quotes either, can't figure out how to get off the mobile site..... ). But HH claimed that it was a quote from an innocent pm, but it turns out it was a quote from post #1 thus he must not have received an innocent pm, or he would know what one looks like...

In light of that I retract my vote on narwhal and vote to lynch HH
 
[AC] HI IQ;2588921 said:
Even though I see Ricket as best vote right now, I would rather my vote count. Only one person hasn't voted as far as I see for this reason I retract my vote on Ricket and vote to lynch Nem. I really do not see a non-lynch being helpful in any way and see more reason for voting Nem then HH

funny i see no case against new but 5 of you do. i didn't expect you would vote HH as you have been backing them up since the screw up
 
[AC] HI IQ;2588803 said:
Well , yes it looks like you were. So tell me why is it so important to you to bring this up? It just gives the feel you know what Scoop is and want it to be taken notice of.

[AC] HI IQ;2588859 said:
You know what I do believe that is something to be questioned and IMO points to nothing but confusion to the town, not sure a vote is suited at this point though so at this time I retract my vote on Chupa.

I vote to lynch Ricket

I can't help but feel they were doing one of two things, either trying to draw votes away from Scoop or trying to "set up" the third person to vote them b/c they know Scoop's identity.
Wow, jokes don't translate well in Mafia, noted. I made the comment as a joke to the comments made towards my first comment. I read several games that I didn't play in where people talked over and over about this mystical third vote. I should have known it would be over scrutinized, especially on Day 1.
 
[AC] gold leader;2588927 said:
I'm not liking HH's argument that it was a pm. ( can't pull quotes either, can't figure out how to get off the mobile site..... ). But HH claimed that it was a quote from an innocent pm, but it turns out it was a quote from post #1 thus he must not have received an innocent pm, or he would know what one looks like...

In light of that I retract my vote on narwhal and vote to lynch HH

Good point there, but I'm also very interested in the timing of your move. Ties it up again with Nemesis.
 
[AC] wing nut;2588928 said:
funny i see no case against new but 5 of you do. i didn't expect you would vote HH as you have been backing them up since the screw up
Backing them up? Just because I see a innocent RC, doesn't in anyway make me "backing them up".
 
AquariaCentral.com