Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[[AC] BadHaggis]

Anyway, it's getting late. Night everyone!

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Not at all. I don't see how it's being scummy, I was just saying what I thought on the subject. You seem pretty defensive for a guy who hasn't done anything scummy. Guilty Conscience?

You're the one who said I was giving you a scummy feeling. I actually found your defense of Scoop pretty amusing, seeing as you are both on my suspect list. I do like how you're trying to turn this on me, just like scum would do. :thumbsup:

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

But if HH wanted players to switch to chupa wouldn't he need to start the train by voting him? This is why I think it was distancing.

Posts like this keep you on my suspect list. Why wuold you assume dd aka dangerdoll when one of the players is named doomsday? Looks like your trying to imply that Nem is in a chat room with her.

I would love to hear more from these players

See, just another thing that can be either way really in my mind with HH. I could see him bringing that up without a vote, to see who/how many would jump on it. A scum way of trying to start a train, and draw votes off someone else. I'm sure everyone going after him/her wasn't part of his/her plan though...kinda back fired LMAO! I'm still not sure which way to lean Chupa, I can see the whole thing going toward someone HH knew to be innocent if enough voted s/he could of jumped on in the end saying "I wasn't the only one to vote them" or leave their vote off, saying "I thought it was suspicious but not vote worthy. In fact if I remember right (have to go back now and see) I believe they did make a post about "I can't help how others see things" or something on those lines. Then again it COULD of been distancing, it's just harder for me to see that one since neither were in trouble at that point. Chupa not posting though, makes it really hard to lean them innocent.

What can I say..I see DD and my mind automatically thinks DDoll, yes that is exactly what I thought at that time. I believed Nem slipped and named her. I wont deny that.

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

I honestly didn't mean it like that... I saw it as a plea for innocence and simply asked why he/she was doing it. Then everyone got confused :/ that's not really my fault.

Well we all have a difference of views and interpretations then... Does that deserve votes? I'm not sure.

Here yes HH did. These look like (at least to me) a "pre" reason for not voting where their mouth was.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

Here yes HH did. These look like (at least to me) a "pre" reason for not voting where their mouth was.

I saw those quotes you pulled as HH trying to get people to take their votes off of him.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

UhOhChongo: 12 posts
chupacabra: 8 posts
Old3Toes: 6 posts

We're 72 hours into the game and that's all those players have bothered to post. Now I know that quantity doesn't equal quality, but with so few posts this far into the game, none of these players are striking me as pro-town. Not posting is a great way to hide if you're scum.

 

[[AC] UhOhChongo]

UhOhChongo: 12 posts
chupacabra: 8 posts
Old3Toes: 6 posts

We're 72 hours into the game and that's all those players have bothered to post. Now I know that quantity doesn't equal quality, but with so few posts this far into the game, none of these players are striking me as pro-town. Not posting is a great way to hide if you're scum.

As I said last night, I am struggling with some kind of virus. After working all day it takes a while to read the game thread. I also said I would go through Ricketts posts since he accused me of selcting only a few nonsense posts and left out his meaninful ones.

I must say that after reading all of ricketts posts from game start to nightfall, I couldn't find any meaningful ones. I did find a couple today that peaked my interest and will include them with my next post. I just wanted to answer this first.

 

[[AC] UhOhChongo]

Rickets, I went through your posts tonight and prior to night fall I didn't see much of anything worth commenting on. What you posted today, however, should be addressed.

You can play those odds all day long, but people always vote for their teammates, always. Yeah the singleton votes didn't help the town a whole lot, and guess what my vote was one of them. I felt strongly about my candidate and I still do although maybe not as much as others after that night 1 result. I didn't see the case on either of the forerunners last night, and I sure wasn't going to put my vote out there on a flight of fancy.

I've seen people align themselves and distance themselves as early as Day 1, again, playing the hypotheticals is a waste of time in Mafia, people do great things sometimes, they also make dumb moves such as defending a teammate on day 1.

Am I the only one with a singleton vote? No, I don't believe so. I even went back and explained my third vote comment on star-crossed before nightfall and you never responded to it. Funny how you call out my posts so much, yet when I give a response it is ignored.

What ball? what responsiblity? You and Hi-IQ are grasping at straws so small you need a microscope, it's kind of sad really. We got a scumbag night 1, be happy, maybe ask for a few more uppers in your meds as well.

Ummmm... did I have a stroke? You really want me bad huh?

While I can see where some are saying Hi IQ looks like he was discussing PMs, I'd like to remind everyone PMs are NEVER to be used as evidence in a game of Mafia. It's a cheap way to play, not sure if this is explicitly in Mad's rules but it's common sense. Which is not that common around here sometimes...

Once again, stop discussing PMs, you are as likely to out a PR as a Mafia. Ever think of that?

I'm sorry but I am not going to pull my own posts, if you want to analyze me I invite you to do so. Heck, do it two or three times like C-Note to be thorough.

Ok I'm done defending myself, time to find scum. Right now my top three are probably the ones hammering me with such trivial details, but that is much too trivial to place a vote on, I always want to make my detractors the baddies but I know that usually isn't the case.

Here is the first post you made that I would consider even pertaining to the game.
It is past time to find scum, when are you going to start trying?

1. Because I wanted to?
2. Because we were talking about non-posters in general, but old3toes in particular in the thread at the time. I'm an implusive gal, it seemed like the thing to do. Also, I can obviously only have one vote at a time...

Your response to being asked why you posted your responses inside the quote. This, to me, reads as an in your face flippant attitude. This attitude is not pro town. Posting inside the quotes is not pro town the only one it helps is the scum doing it because we can't pull your posts to prove a point.

I'd vote for Ricket, they have obvious scum tells.

The first ring of truth I have seen from you. Also the first of you answering questions that were directed to someone else.

Your mother? I'm just pulling your chain, kind of, but I've answered every question asked of me after being grilled for a stupid day 1 joke. If you don't like my answers I can't help you much.

Eh, I know you were, I said lynching me was a good choice. Geez, no one can take a joke in these games anymore. You've gotta be super srsbsn all the time or you are done for. Also, I can't find a question you have asked me that I did not answer, help me out.

If you continue to ask so many questions in one post, I'm going to answer inside the quote, that way it is easy to see what I am answering. I don't really care what the convention is, I was doing it for clarity. And just to help you out I'll say here, I pretty much agree with what you've said above, but when you quote this you won't see your quote, so it's moot. It's a bad flaw in this forums way of quoting posts, in fact it is the only forum I visit that doesn't stack quoted quotes...

More of your attitude. You also are telling us that you don't care about whether or not we can pull your posts by telling us you will continue to post inside the quotes if we ask multiple questions in the post.

Why is that?

What do you have to hide?

Hi IQ and UhOhChongo are probably my top two right now. Hi IQ I think over reacted to the PM/1st post business on day 1, even if I completely agree that PMs should not be used as evidence in the game. I still find UhOhs few posts to be too "me too"-ish and they seem to pop in almost on a schedule to second whatever opinion is popular at the time. C-Note funny enough comes off very pro-town to me even though I am one of their biggest suspects. They really seem to want to find scum.

Really? That is the best you have? Some of us have lives so we can't spam the game thread. I get here when I can. When I do, I post my thoughts on what I have seen. I am sorry if it doesn't live up to your high expectations of trying to find scum. Oh, wait, I have read all your posts. You don't try to find scum.

As others said, it is internetese for serious business, meaning some people take the game a little too seriously, which imo (in my opinion) takes the fun out of it. I think Hi IQ is distancing, although if I were an innocent player and got myself tied that close to a known scum, I would try and distance myself as well as if I were one of their team mates. I don't see the connection with Chup though.

Same here.

Seriously? DD is Doomsday, grasping... at... straws...

I never said don't ask questions... I said don't ask so many in one post, or number them. Otherwise I will post inside the quote FOR CLARITY. Would you like me to be MORE CLEAR for you? Also, I did it again because I saw it was grinding your gears.


I vote to lynch Hi IQ

Since you want to educate us on "internetese" let me educate you. It is text speak. And you are the only one who called it internetese.

Another blatant attitude now you are instructing us on how we can post and question?

Nice, you really help to solidify my thoughts on you. The only reason to try to "grind someones gears" is if you are evil trying to rile someone up, to get them going so you can make a "case" on them.
Why don't you know how to answer more then one question per post without loosing your thought?

Why can't you look at the quote, to see what you are answering?

Why do you feel the need to make it harder on everyone to see what you post?

Why are you trying so hard to pull thoughts away from Nem?

Were you trying to set up the 3rd voter on Scoop?

If so were you doing it to make them look bad because s/he is innocent, or to try and make yourself somehow look good if s/he is scum?

How will you feel when your hands are so dirty from lynching a innocent?

Is Nem or Scoop your snoop or vote blocker?

Yawn.

Your response to HI IQ's questions to you in the post directly above.
Do we bore you with attempts to root out scum? Or were you instructed to quiet down but can't resist spamming the thread?

Because there isn't a train on me like there has been on Nem. Nem's the easy target.

Again answering for someone else.

But yesterday Nem was very much a train vote, I assume at least some of that mentality and doubt remain even if Nem is not currently a top vote getter.

When it is a close race it is not a train.

To sum this up, you have not demonstrated a very pro town attitude at all. IMO your attitude has been as anti town as you can get.

I could see myself voting you very easily because of it and I still might. The question remains as to the whereabouts of DDay who I am beginning to think is another one of your cohorts.

What really strikes me is that your attitude didn't show like this until after HH got lynched.(Actually he was toasted with a mattress spring.) That must have really upset you for you to become so flippant with your attitude.

 

[[AC] maelstrom]

I don't know if I"m really seeing the case on Hi-IQ, if they are innocent it would be very easy for the scum to find the one person who agreed, or seemed to agree enough to make a case on, and get the town running towards the next lynch, especially after the confidence boost of getting a scum last night.

I'm going to go back through and read since nightfall and see the order of events leading up to this train on HI-IQ.

To make things clear, I'm not in any way defending Hi-IQ I'm just stating that I want to review this more for myself than just jump on the band wagon

I wanted to look at this again. Like I said this sits a little odd to me. I have no problem with someone defending some if they think that the case is weak, but then at the end saying you were not defending them makes it seem like they are covering for themselvs. The case aginst HI IQ seems to be getting strong at this point and a few people behind it. Gold leader also says they were going to go back over all the post then say what he thinks, but this was the last post from him. Not using post count as a fight because I just see post count as an easy way for the bad guys to draw intrest onto a good guy. What I am saying is the post seems kind of like gold leader is saying I am here and posted then disappears.

 

[[AC] BadHaggis]

You're the one who said I was giving you a scummy feeling. I actually found your defense of Scoop pretty amusing, seeing as you are both on my suspect list. I do like how you're trying to turn this on me, just like scum would do. :thumbsup:

Well, since we're both on your suspect list then I'm sure that you'll automatically see ever possible connection. That's why I don't keep scum lists, they just distract me. So, what about my defense of Scoop was amusing? "Just like scum would do"- how is that not trying turn to it right back on me "just like scum would do"? Sheesh... I saw something, and I posted about it. Your the one who seems to be making a big deal about it...