[AC] Doomsday998;2588584 said:could be but how do you know?
I don't but at the same time you just assumed they were playing.
[AC] Doomsday998;2588584 said:could be but how do you know?
Well lookey lookey the proverbial Cheshire Cat appears. Banter is not as useful as say.... talking is. We can't find scum if no one talks, we can't tell if you are scum if you don't talk. this is a boring game if no one talks. See where I'm going. And no, low posts does not equal scum, but we can't tell what you are if you... stay with me... don't talk.[AC] Old3Toes;2588565 said:I would like to know how banter can be useful in finding scum. I would also like to know if this means low-poster = scum, so high-poster = innocent.
[AC] Hammerhead 991;2588518 said:Are you kidding? Your first post is a roll call as I see it. Why I ask? What's the need?
[AC] gold leader;2588553 said:not the point of the game at all......
How do you know this?
[AC] RICKETS;2588554 said:I think with hidden identities hitting scum night 1 is actually more likely because you build your case on posts and not on personality.
[AC] RICKETS;2588608 said:Who will be the "infamous" third vote on Scoop? The inmates want to know.
[AC] RICKETS;2588608 said:Who will be the "infamous" third vote on Scoop? The inmates want to know.
That's true. I just thought it was funny when I read old games where everyone voted for the third person to vote for someone the next day.[AC] Star-Crossed;2588611 said:Doesn't it only "matter" if the person is innocent though? Are you assuming Scoop is innocent already?
I was not aware we were hung up on it? Everyone is going to be curious, but I personally don't care who anyone is, only if they are scum.[AC] BadHaggis;2588614 said:Ok, can we please get past the whole "Who's who?" thing?
Want me to be the third on Scoop, I don't have a dog in the hunt this early on. Which reminds me.[AC] Driver8;2588616 said:Doing a little protecting by trying to make a victim of the next person to vote Scoop?