Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[[AC] Doomsday998]

I'm still on pins and needles awaiting your observations as to what has been "anti-town" about my game.

I am leaning toward agreeing about HIQ.

again with the band wagon? one player goes to him and you jump right on it? any reason to that? other than an omgus vote?

 

[[AC] maelstrom]

Is there any way to get the full site on a IPhone, I really hate the mobile site but can't figure out how to get the full site. Most websites give u both choices.

I find it interesting that HH thought it was from the innocent pm. Was this because he never got the innocent PM? To me it seems like it does. Now only if I could bold o. This dammed mobile site.

Let's see if Mad takes this because I can't bold...
I retract my vote for narwhal and vote to lynch HH.

Way to hop the bandwagon...

Funny how I chose the guy my coin told me to, out of TWO people who had trains on them. And funny how you jumped the train on HH, along with several other people *cough* Mael *cough*

On the original post I made trying to vote would have put HH ahead by 2 votes. I think this was an important vote with the tie rule in this game. I know this was not the vote that counted but I still tryed. I dont know how I was jumping on a bandwagon and then you bring it up again 2 post later. I am wondering your thinking behind your theory?

 

[[AC] maelstrom]

that first quote was a mistake.

 

[[AC] C-note]

I got looking at Rickets.

I think with hidden identities hitting scum night 1 is actually more likely because you build your case on posts and not on personality.

his huh? Interesting.

And thusly, the first stone was cast. Bum bum bum.

First post was ironically accurate if he is mafia. There's literally nothing before this post but nonsense from Rick.

With twelve hours till Night doth fall, I vote to lynch old3toes

Perchance it will get more action from this individual, or maybe they are in solitary confinement for humping the lawn ornaments.

12 hours left, and Rick calls out O3T. And cares enough about calling him out as to use his vote to do it.

Well lookey lookey the proverbial Cheshire Cat appears. Banter is not as useful as say.... talking is. We can't find scum if no one talks, we can't tell if you are scum if you don't talk. this is a boring game if no one talks. See where I'm going. And no, low posts does not equal scum, but we can't tell what you are if you... stay with me... don't talk.

Now fade away to just a grin Cheshire.

O3Tposts and this is what Rick had waited so long to say. Really? Was that that important to you, Rick? If you called the guy out, you couldn't have had an actual question prepared?

Who will be the "infamous" third vote on Scoop? The inmates want to know.

Third vote stuff. Could be trying smoke and mirrors.

That's true. I just thought it was funny when I read old games where everyone voted for the third person to vote for someone the next day.

I was not aware we were hung up on it? Everyone is going to be curious, but I personally don't care who anyone is, only if they are scum.

Want me to be the third on Scoop, I don't have a dog in the hunt this early on. Which reminds me.

I retract my vote for old3toes.

That vote served its purpose I reckon.

I thought this post was great. Here Rick a) says the 3rd vote thing was just a joke... then later on he brings it up again. Offering to be the 3rd vote. It seems like he's just trying to get the conversation started without taking any credit for it. And b) he retracts his vote on O3T, apparently being satisfied by the fruits his mighty plan had wrought. Tell me Rick, what do you feel you learned through that exchange?

UhOh is posting just enough to seem active, and only comments when others get something going on people. In reverse chrono order, because its easier that way.







That's a lot of wishy-washy "not being sure what to make of's"

I vote to lynch UhOh

Whole post seems oddly ironic coming from you, Rick. Way to go, buddy. :thm:

@UhOh: Yep

I notice you didn't pull any of my posts where I made meaningful comments, nice try to defame me though.

I've been looking for those too. Maybe you could point out a few that were "meaningful".

Wow, jokes don't translate well in Mafia, noted. I made the comment as a joke to the comments made towards my first comment. I read several games that I didn't play in where people talked over and over about this mystical third vote. I should have known it would be over scrutinized, especially on Day 1.

So it was over scrutinized in the games you read ("talked over and over" about), and you didn't think it would go that way this time? Again it seems like trying to drop responsibility for a ball you passed.

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

Was it just convenient for you to just leave this out? I guess it doesn't go with your misguided theory....

Well, there is a rule against posting one's PM if that is really the PM they will be removed from the game I believe. Although, when I click on the quote it takes me to the rules of the game, I think they quoted the rules and deleted all but that part.
This does make me wonder quite a bit and a out right role claim as that on day one especially certainly DOES make them stand out. Not sure how exactly I missed that, or why no one else took notice of it. This stands out more than anything else to me.

I vote to lynch Chupa

Gold leader, Nem, and Rickets are others that I could see voting for. None have done anything that SCREAMS scum, but they all have posted in ways that make me wonder more about them then others.

Sorry... my comment came out in the quoted text above. The last two lines in blue: Both seem to have thought that that was what the innocent PM looked like, so they assumed he copied it from the PM. That's one of those things that make you wonder 'bout a feller.

 

[[AC] C-note]

I think with hidden identities hitting scum night 1 is actually more likely because you build your case on posts and not on personality.

his huh? Interesting.

And thusly, the first stone was cast. Bum bum bum.

Wow, dude. You are really going out on a limb with this one. But it should be fun to see how that plays out for you. PS... you still haven't let me in on what's suspicious to you about my game. You seem to be trying to come on strong to get me to back down. It won't work.

With twelve hours till Night doth fall, I vote to lynch old3toes

Perchance it will get more action from this individual, or maybe they are in solitary confinement for humping the lawn ornaments.

Well lookey lookey the proverbial Cheshire Cat appears. Banter is not as useful as say.... talking is. We can't find scum if no one talks, we can't tell if you are scum if you don't talk. this is a boring game if no one talks. See where I'm going. And no, low posts does not equal scum, but we can't tell what you are if you... stay with me... don't talk.

Now fade away to just a grin Cheshire.

Who will be the "infamous" third vote on Scoop? The inmates want to know.

That's true. I just thought it was funny when I read old games where everyone voted for the third person to vote for someone the next day.

I was not aware we were hung up on it? Everyone is going to be curious, but I personally don't care who anyone is, only if they are scum.

Want me to be the third on Scoop, I don't have a dog in the hunt this early on. Which reminds me.

I retract my vote for old3toes.

That vote served its purpose I reckon.

UhOh is posting just enough to seem active, and only comments when others get something going on people. In reverse chrono order, because its easier that way.







That's a lot of wishy-washy "not being sure what to make of's"

I vote to lynch UhOh

@UhOh: Yep

I notice you didn't pull any of my posts where I made meaningful comments, nice try to defame me though.

Wow, jokes don't translate well in Mafia, noted. I made the comment as a joke to the comments made towards my first comment. I read several games that I didn't play in where people talked over and over about this mystical third vote. I should have known it would be over scrutinized, especially on Day 1.

again with the band wagon? one player goes to him and you jump right on it? any reason to that? other than an omgus vote?

Would it? or would it be obvous to your buddys lurking in the scum den?

Before i go farther into this rant i think i for got this earlier Sorry to see you go star crossed =(

rant contnuing

note how every player posting after night says something to the effect of sorry to see you go star

then we get to you: yay we got one sucks we lost one

thats it for the way i see it now you are upset at the lynch of hh and are yaying the loss of star because it brings you one step clocer to victory

I VOTE TO LYNCH C NOTE

 

[[AC] C-note]

I"ll get to the rickets stuff in a minute...

 

[[AC] HI IQ]

Just catching up here, sorry I have not been more active. When looking at the thread and the timing of things, when it was a tie early on, Hi IQ changed his vote. I am pretty sure at the time this vote took the tie away or the lead away from HH - one or the other. Maybe because I was reading it all condensed and not in real time, but when I read it appeared that Hi IQ was attempting to save HH without looking like they were saving HH. I am going to read more - and do my best to post more, but things will be crazy until the weekend. I vote to lynch Hi IQ Besides them, I am a little uneasy about C-Note.

Yes, I changed my vote and yes it put Nem in the lead. A tie would do nothing for the town, I may or may not of picked the right person to put my vote on, as we still have no idea what Nem is..but leaving my vote where it was did nothing to help the town, so yes I switched.

 

[[AC] C-note]

Was it just convenient for you to just leave this out? I guess it doesn't go with your misguided theory....

Doesn't change my theory in the least. Your post still points to the fact that you didn't know what the innocent PM said. I think that's a pretty telling little piece of information.

 

[[AC] C-note]

Wow, dude. You are really going out on a limb with this one. But it should be fun to see how that plays out for you. PS... you still haven't let me in on what's suspicious to you about my game. You seem to be trying to come on strong to get me to back down. It won't work.

OK... I was confused... the rickets stuff in this post was double posted from the other one... sorry. Just ignore those.