Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[AC] Driver8;2589448 said:
I have been thinking about HH, he starts this PM/role call thing to I suppose start a case on a known innocent. My question is why? There was a lead vote getter already candidate already. Was HH trying to be overly clever to get someone voted off or was he trying to save some one. I am not sure but I leaning towards the save some one. If that supposition is correct then there is a very short list of person who where in trouble.

Of course HH could have just been stirring the pot and got carried away, I just do not see why. I feel HH had to be protecting only way I can figure it.

Who is the known innocent? Who was HH protecting?
 
[AC] xx_Nemesis_xx;2589461 said:
As of post 519:

For turnign something into nothing regarding me asking DD and Narwhal to stop. I really don't see you as that scummy, but you are my 2nd place.

In this case, yes, the vote for HH was a for decent reasoning (and paid off), but in most games, the vote D1 leaves us with one less townie or sometimes one less PR.

Because I called him/her on something scummy..
When did you tell DD to stop? I didn't realize she was one of the players this round, guess you do though...and how may that be, hmmm makes one wonder :)


[AC] Tree_Hugger;2589469 said:
So your answer is you don't want to answer? You said these two were your 2 top suspects. Who would you vote for is all I'm asking. I'm also trying to figure out if you are distancing from Chup or not. Heck Chup seems to have dropped right off of your radar. Your answer won't do much for us now I suspect but it may shed some light once we know what you are. I'm thinking that because of your dancing and non-answer to the question you are scum.

Unless something better arises...I vote to lynch HI IQ
I mis read your question actually...I thought you were asking me if I would still vote Nem after finding out HH was scum.
At this point, really I could see voting either one of them.

[AC] RICKETS;2589471 said:
Your mother? ;) I'm just pulling your chain, kind of, but I've answered every question asked of me after being grilled for a stupid day 1 joke. If you don't like my answers I can't help you much.

Eh, I know you were, I said lynching me was a good choice. Geez, no one can take a joke in these games anymore. You've gotta be super srsbsn all the time or you are done for. Also, I can't find a question you have asked me that I did not answer, help me out.

If you continue to ask so many questions in one post, I'm going to answer inside the quote, that way it is easy to see what I am answering. I don't really care what the convention is, I was doing it for clarity. And just to help you out I'll say here, I pretty much agree with what you've said above, but when you quote this you won't see your quote, so it's moot. It's a bad flaw in this forums way of quoting posts, in fact it is the only forum I visit that doesn't stack quoted quotes...

So you don't want me to ask questions...guess that could be pretty convenient, just so you no I will say it again. IT IS FROWNED UPON TO ANSWER A QUOTE WITHIN A QUOTE, it's pretty much a unwritten rule in the game. It isn't CLEAR when it takes so much for others to have to go through so much to REPOST the quote. But is nice to know you don't really care what the convention is though
 
[AC] HI IQ;2589434 said:
Vote count post 180.....

The VERY next post 181, was by HH starting the whole PM thing....

I really think s/he was trying to redirect attention

[AC] Driver8;2589448 said:
I have been thinking about HH, he starts this PM/role call thing to I suppose start a case on a known innocent. My question is why? There was a lead vote getter already candidate already. Was HH trying to be overly clever to get someone voted off or was he trying to save some one. I am not sure but I leaning towards the save some one. If that supposition is correct then there is a very short list of person who where in trouble.

Of course HH could have just been stirring the pot and got carried away, I just do not see why. I feel HH had to be protecting only way I can figure it.

Possible but why not to one of the 2 up for lynching? Why bring in a 3rd person? Possible both scoop and nem are scum but what makes 1 more important then HH? Unless they are the role blocker and snoop. hmmm

I still feel it could also be a distancing tactic though as chupa did vote HH and HH seemed to have a better case against chupa but never placed a vote there. Usually if you're trying to protect another player you'd move your vote to the person you are building a case against in hopes others pile on..

[AC] HI IQ;2589453 said:
My top 2 are diffidently Ricket and Nem at this point. Scoop, has my concern too as Rickets could of easily been trying to "scare" ppl from voting them and they also could be who HH was trying to draw attention away from.

I still feel this is possible to.



I have an event to attend tonight so probably won't be back on, I like my vote as is for now.
 
I was agreeing with rickets scaring players off scoop, not that Nem is a suspect of mine. Though I can see possibilities for it.
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2589476 said:
Here's a question...what is srsbsn? The question I asked was put out there to everyone. What are your thoughts on HH and HI IQ possibly distancing from Chup.
As others said, it is internetese for serious business, meaning some people take the game a little too seriously, which imo (in my opinion) takes the fun out of it. I think Hi IQ is distancing, although if I were an innocent player and got myself tied that close to a known scum, I would try and distance myself as well as if I were one of their team mates. I don't see the connection with Chup though.
[AC] Tiburon321;2589485 said:
I think srsbsn stands for serious business. And I don't agree with these games being serious all the time, I like the mix of serious and fun.
Same here.
[AC] HI IQ;2589509 said:
When did you tell DD to stop? I didn't realize she was one of the players this round, guess you do though...and how may that be, hmmm makes one wonder :)

I mis read your question actually...I thought you were asking me if I would still vote Nem after finding out HH was scum.
At this point, really I could see voting either one of them.

So you don't want me to ask questions...guess that could be pretty convenient, just so you no I will say it again. IT IS FROWNED UPON TO ANSWER A QUOTE WITHIN A QUOTE, it's pretty much a unwritten rule in the game. It isn't CLEAR when it takes so much for others to have to go through so much to REPOST the quote. But is nice to know you don't really care what the convention is though
Seriously? DD is Doomsday, grasping... at... straws...

I never said don't ask questions... I said don't ask so many in one post, or number them. Otherwise I will post inside the quote FOR CLARITY. Would you like me to be MORE CLEAR for you? Also, I did it again because I saw it was grinding your gears.


I vote to lynch Hi IQ
 
[AC] RICKETS;2589526 said:
As others said, it is internetese for serious business, meaning some people take the game a little too seriously, which imo (in my opinion) takes the fun out of it. I think Hi IQ is distancing, although if I were an innocent player and got myself tied that close to a known scum, I would try and distance myself as well as if I were one of their team mates. I don't see the connection with Chup though.

Same here.

Seriously? DD is Doomsday, grasping... at... straws...

I never said don't ask questions... I said don't ask so many in one post, or number them. Otherwise I will post inside the quote FOR CLARITY. Would you like me to be MORE CLEAR for you? Also, I did it again because I saw it was grinding your gears.


I vote to lynch Hi IQ
Nice, you really help to solidify my thoughts on you. The only reason to try to "grind someones gears" is if you are evil trying to rile someone up, to get them going so you can make a "case" on them.
Why don't you know how to answer more then one question per post without loosing your thought?

Why can't you look at the quote, to see what you are answering?

Why do you feel the need to make it harder on everyone to see what you post?

Why are you trying so hard to pull thoughts away from Nem?

Were you trying to set up the 3rd voter on Scoop?

If so were you doing it to make them look bad because s/he is innocent, or to try and make yourself somehow look good if s/he is scum?

How will you feel when your hands are so dirty from lynching a innocent?

Is Nem or Scoop your snoop or vote blocker?
 
Oh I forgot.....

I vote to lynch Nem
 
I don't know if I"m really seeing the case on Hi-IQ, if they are innocent it would be very easy for the scum to find the one person who agreed, or seemed to agree enough to make a case on, and get the town running towards the next lynch, especially after the confidence boost of getting a scum last night.

I'm going to go back through and read since nightfall and see the order of events leading up to this train on HI-IQ.

To make things clear, I'm not in any way defending Hi-IQ I'm just stating that I want to review this more for myself than just jump on the band wagon
 
Yawn.
 
AquariaCentral.com