Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

And another post outside the thread gone......

Guys you really got to watch yourself, I'm sure the mods have enough to do/worry about besides chasing posts down to delete.:)
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2590170 said:
Can you delete the posts in here from that RB guy ;)


Can, but won't.....though I may run the nightfall on the next game day....
 
[AC] Tree_Hugger;2590112 said:
Does anyone else feel uneasy about these votes or is it just me? Seems like a cop out and an easy way for scum to hide. It definitely doesn't help the Town. Most of our knowledge comes from where people vote and finding patterns.

I want to wait and see if they try to last minute vote. Could be trying to lull us into a false sence of security,but seems a bit early to do that as we wuold just lynch them tomorrow.

another thought is that scum wouldn't no vote unless both players in the lead are innocents so they could say well i didn't vote whoever is lynched.

and a third thought is that they actually didn't have time to read and don't want to lynch an innocent. neither has screamed scum to me but its worth watching

if i were them i wuold just have voted my top suspect

[AC] Tree_Hugger;2590127 said:
I'm not seeing how this was protecting as D8 put it. D8 specifically said "protecting" Nem. Maybe D8 could actually answer the question. Unless they did and I just missed it.

I wuold like to hear from driver about this to, especialy after i posted why i don't think its protection of nem after all. post 651

[AC] Doomsday998;2590131 said:
alright i hate to bring up an old thing and this close to night fall to and im just curious how does everyone feel about tibs post on D1 about upping some ones meds? i have got to go pull the post and will in a minuet but does anyone have any opinion on this?

[AC] Doomsday998;2590137 said:
that whole conversation seems a lill off to me anyone else got an opinion here?

I think your bringing this up because tib got 2 quick votes and are hoping for a late run against him to save a team mate.
 
[AC] wing nut;2590177 said:
I want to wait and see if they try to last minute vote. Could be trying to lull us into a false sence of security,but seems a bit early to do that as we wuold just lynch them tomorrow.

another thought is that scum wouldn't no vote unless both players in the lead are innocents so they could say well i didn't vote whoever is lynched.

and a third thought is that they actually didn't have time to read and don't want to lynch an innocent. neither has screamed scum to me but its worth watching

if i were them i wuold just have voted my top suspect



I wuold like to hear from driver about this to, especialy after i posted why i don't think its protection of nem after all. post 651





I think your bringing this up because tib got 2 quick votes and are hoping for a late run against him to save a team mate.

I thought and still do that it was protecting, I see no other reason for scum to start that obvious silliness at that point in the game, unless the are a few sandwiches short. A vote here or there in the right place is a great way for scum to hide and one vote moving late just screams scum in these games. It is my theory and I will stick with it at least until this night fall. Not sure what else you want me to answer but ask away.
 
[AC] scoop411;2590074 said:
Tib, you keep bringing up the fact that used this tactic before, and it doesn't stick right with me. You keep bringing this up, even though it's not really relevant to my gameplay. Sure I could be trying something similar, but there isn't a need to keep repeating that fact over and over again. IMO it looks like I made a good post responding to your question, and couldn't find anything wrong with it, so you went back to talking about how YOU used a hit to your advantage as scum. Not about my gameplay, just about the hit. (Yes, you did mention me being up for the lynch early, but I've already said my thoughts about that)

So, you make a case against me and then place an early vote on me. IMO it looks like you were determined to use that hit to your advantage, and try and lynch me off of it, even though I already said "I can feel a set-up coming" taking away your chance to frame me. Despite that, you still tried to get a vote on me for the lynch.

Now you can see that nobody has followed Tib onto me, and he quickly cut his losses and moved on. There weren't any "Wheres scoop?" or "Scoops been quiet" posts, even though I'm sure my post count is low. Then he posts this:



Now that you haven't got any else to vote me, you decide to cut your losses and jump into getting another vote out there. If you really thought I was scum, then you would've kept up your argument, not moved on to a train on doom.

Then you conviently join in with the excuses for not being at nightfall. IMO it looks like "monkey see, monkey do", as you post this excuse to leave after severeal others do. It looks to me like your trying to sneak away from having to deal with posts at nightfall, and blend in to the background.

I vote to lynch tib
That's not what I was doing at all, but I can see why you'd say you see it that way. Btw, my "excuse" is very real.

[AC] BadHaggis;2590094 said:
I vote to lynch Tib for all the reasons previously stated, aka:

Making something small into something big (which gives me a scummy feeling about him), Overly defensive (I said something accusing him of evil, he jumped on me for it, tried to turn it back at me), cut his losses (by going from Scoop, a lone vote that didn't matter, to DDay), by creating an excuse for not being here nightfall (like a number of other people). Yes, I agreed with Scoop on the last two, which I wouldn't have noticed if he hadn't pointed them out. Does that make me evil?
Cool, so Scoop + Haggis team up again. Good to know.
[AC] Doomsday998;2590131 said:
alright i hate to bring up an old thing and this close to night fall to and im just curious how does everyone feel about tibs post on D1 about upping some ones meds? i have got to go pull the post and will in a minuet but does anyone have any opinion on this?
I see you're trying to continue the sudden sentiments against me.
[AC] Doomsday998;2590137 said:
that whole conversation seems a lill off to me anyone else got an opinion here?
and more of the same, continuing to try to rally against me.
[AC] HI IQ;2590154 said:
Tib, until this post I wasn't really seeing much on you and had you pretty much neutral. Now, if you would like to move your vote I don't see how the "possible"tie should stop you, there was still close to 4 hours left for ppl to vote/switch. If you want to vote me, you should have...I don't get why you are so worried about "the mafia" trying to tie it up, those that did that would be hugely scrutinized so I really don't see the risk, it looks more like you want to wait and see where everyone else votes to place yours?


As it was against you, I can understand your feeling that way. Although, I was not at anytime "defending" Hammer. My stance was pretty much just that you seemed (to me) to be claiming innocent from the get go. As I said when I retracted my vote, it really wasn't vote worthy. I really suggest looking back and reading what has actually happened as opposed to what you "think" you remember before you get to confident in that vote.

I know I had you at the top of my list for scum, but I can't decide if you just got caught up in HH's crap or if you were helping them.
 
AquariaCentral.com