Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[AC] Tiburon321;2592194 said:
They have participated, but they have not built a case on someone. That is why they are in my top scum list. Total scum tactic to look like you're working by posting stuff that looks good but doesn't incriminate any of your teammates or make you take too drastic of a stand and draw attention to yourself.
Click to expand...

yup. That pretty much sums up my case on BH....
 
[AC] scoop411;2592198 said:
Tib, why would it make sense to use Night 3? They knew that their role blocker was safe (ensuring that they could use the ability latter) seeing as how an innocent had the lead at nightfall, and the vig was killed N2. Why not wait to use it, they could've saved it for when they thought they were in legitamate danger. (Had the role blocker up for lynch so they had to get it off, or maybe they could've used it when the tracker/detective RC'd with info about possible scum.

I'm warning all the PR's out there to not RC, unless it is absolutely neccesary, as they still have 4 scum left.
Click to expand...
Day 1 would make no sense to use that power as it tends to be a random crapshoot. Chances are the vig wouldn't take their shot day 1. It wouldn't have saved HH from the lynch.

Day 2 still wouldn't make much sense, it's a bit early in the game for the vig shot (even though they took it), and the doc prob still doesn't have a good idea who to protect. The det may not have a great idea who to invest either.

By day 3, things are tightening up. The doc is more likely to accurately protect, the det has a better suspect list, and the scum team may start to worry about their role blocker being on the chopping block for the lynch. They don't want to lose that blocking power. If you look at the voting on Day 3, there wasn't really a front-runner until Gun just not showing up. After I was 3rd on Gun, Haggis suddenly goes from no vote to vote on Gun. Haggis had been topping many lists as scummy, I wouldn't be surprised if they were the role blocker and the scum team decided they better use that power night 3 before Haggis got lynched without having used it.

If it's not been used and Rickets is lying, I fully expect it to be used tonight. Would be stupid for them to risk losing that power. But after looking at the voting pattern from last time, I'm thinking Haggis is the role blocker. Typing these thoughts out has solidified my decision to believe Rickets and move my vote.

I retract my vote on Rickets. I vote to lynch Bad Haggis.
 
And definitely, no townie PRs should come out, unless Rickets is lying. Even then, it should only be the tracker. The doc can only save 1 person each night.
 
[AC] scoop411;2592218 said:
well, I'm going to hit the books and finish up my homeworko, and try to find out the score of the game. (Didn't go cause I'm sick)
Click to expand...

sorry, I forgot that you guys don't like it when everyone speaks spainish. Hopefully you won't decipher my secret messages in spainish that I left in that post.
 
[AC] scoop411;2592207 said:
yup. That pretty much sums up my case on BH....
Click to expand...

um... how?

[AC] Tiburon321;2592212 said:
Day 1 would make no sense to use that power as it tends to be a random crapshoot. Chances are the vig wouldn't take their shot day 1. It wouldn't have saved HH from the lynch.

Day 2 still wouldn't make much sense, it's a bit early in the game for the vig shot (even though they took it), and the doc prob still doesn't have a good idea who to protect. The det may not have a great idea who to invest either.

By day 3, things are tightening up. The doc is more likely to accurately protect, the det has a better suspect list, and the scum team may start to worry about their role blocker being on the chopping block for the lynch. They don't want to lose that blocking power. If you look at the voting on Day 3, there wasn't really a front-runner until Gun just not showing up. After I was 3rd on Gun, Haggis suddenly goes from no vote to vote on Gun. Haggis had been topping many lists as scummy, I wouldn't be surprised if they were the role blocker and the scum team decided they better use that power night 3 before Haggis got lynched without having used it.

If it's not been used and Rickets is lying, I fully expect it to be used tonight. Would be stupid for them to risk losing that power. But after looking at the voting pattern from last time, I'm thinking Haggis is the role blocker. Typing these thoughts out has solidified my decision to believe Rickets and move my vote.

I retract my vote on Rickets. I vote to lynch Bad Haggis.
Click to expand...

I see 3 issues with that. First off, it's wrong, second, I wasn't in danger day 3. Third, if you look back in time, I did not vote Gun right after you, I voted him after Nem did. You voted him in post 884, Nem in post 899, and I voted him in post 907. So your dead wrong.
 
[AC] scoop411;2592221 said:
sorry, I forgot that you guys don't like it when everyone speaks spainish. Hopefully you won't decipher my secret messages in spainish that I left in that post.
Click to expand...
spaInish :rofl:
 
[AC] scoop411;2592188 said:
I never wanted to have to do this, but in lieu of recent events I feel that I need to make a role claim to ensure that nobody else trys to fake my role.

I am an innocent townie
Click to expand...

[AC] scoop411;2592190 said:
don't tell anyone my role though guys, I'm trying to keep it a secret :nono:
Click to expand...

At this stage of the game you post this? IMO it is things like this that make you suspect.
 
[AC] BadHaggis;2592223 said:
um... how?



I see 3 issues with that. First off, it's wrong, second, I wasn't in danger day 3. Third, if you look back in time, I did not vote Gun right after you, I voted him after Nem did. You voted him in post 884, Nem in post 899, and I voted him in post 907. So your dead wrong.
Click to expand...

In fact, I wasn't in danger at this game till now. 2 votes isn't the end of the world when 5 people have yet to vote. So I was never in any real danger there. AND the mafia has 2 solid hours where I wasn't in danger, so even if i was the Role Blocker, I would have been more then able to withdraw the block. So, basically, everything you've said is wrong.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom