Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

[Madcrawdad]

Vote Count (thru post 1128) - red indicates retracted vote

BH (5) - nar 979, scoop 1011, RICK 1065, mael 1108, Tib 1123
RICK (3) - Tree 1032, UhOh 1037, Tib 1092, Nem 1093
Driver (2) - O3T 988, BH 1000
UhOh (1) - chup 1054

No vote: Driver

Nightfall in 1 1/2 hours (8 pm CST). PMs as required, please.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

I see 3 issues with that. First off, it's wrong, second, I wasn't in danger day 3. Third, if you look back in time, I did not vote Gun right after you, I voted him after Nem did. You voted him in post 884, Nem in post 899, and I voted him in post 907. So your dead wrong.

My bad, I didn't go back to look. I just knew you followed shortly after me. Made me uneasy since I had you at the top section of my scum list. I should have trusted my gut and voted for you instead. Still doesn't make it wrong that you were 4th on after momentum had been building against Gun, and after talk of how the "no vote" was a scummy cop out. You jumped on the easy ride, knowing full well that Gun was innocent. Since you were topping so many lists, you could have easily been the lynch. The votes don't necessarily reflect that, but looking at peoples lists and how many were questioning you, there is no way you can say you weren't in danger Day 3.

I have to say the last sentence is sooooo dramatic. Omg, let me change my vote. :nilly:

Not.

 

[[AC] BadHaggis]

My bad, I didn't go back to look. I just knew you followed shortly after me. Made me uneasy since I had you at the top section of my scum list. I should have trusted my gut and voted for you instead. Still doesn't make it wrong that you were 4th on after momentum had been building against Gun, and after talk of how the "no vote" was a scummy cop out. You jumped on the easy ride, knowing full well that Gun was innocent. Since you were topping so many lists, you could have easily been the lynch. The votes don't necessarily reflect that, but looking at peoples lists and how many were questioning you, there is no way you can say you weren't in danger Day 3.

I have to say the last sentence is sooooo dramatic. Omg, let me change my vote. :nilly:

Not.

That last sentence does sound a little creepy...

Anyway, I changed from a No Vote to Gun because I was told IN THE THREAD that No Votes were bad. Gun was just the poor sap I saw and thought was evil. I was wrong, but so were 4 other people.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

In fact, I wasn't in danger at this game till now. 2 votes isn't the end of the world when 5 people have yet to vote. So I was never in any real danger there. AND the mafia has 2 solid hours where I wasn't in danger, so even if i was the Role Blocker, I would have been more then able to withdraw the block. So, basically, everything you've said is wrong.

Yeah right. So you've not been topping people's scum lists? You've not been wishy washy? You didn't change your vote to be 4th on Gun and help solidify the vote against him? You didn't retract your vote for "no one" after the discussion on how it is scummy and gives no information? Please, tell me how that is all wrong? I mean, you said everything I said is wrong.

From a scum strategy standpoint, why would using the role block night 3 be a bad move?

Do you think Rickets is lying about being the tracker?

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

That last sentence does sound a little creepy...

Anyway, I changed from a No Vote to Gun because I was told IN THE THREAD that No Votes were bad. Gun was just the poor sap I saw and thought was evil. I was wrong, but so were 4 other people.

Yes, I have pointed that out that you only changed from your No Vote to a vote on Gun, who you would have known was innocent, after the pressure to actually vote for someone was applied. Obviously you're voting for an innocent, but hey, so did 4 other people. So you can totally point fingers at others. I fully admit I unintentionally voted for an innocent day 2 (Doom) and day 3 (Gun). I also built cases against them and did the best I could with the information available in the thread. You, on the other hand, I don't remember actually building a case on Gun. I remember you just tagging along for the ride once it looked safe for you to jump on.

 

[[AC] BadHaggis]

Yeah right. So you've not been topping people's scum lists? You've not been wishy washy? You didn't change your vote to be 4th on Gun and help solidify the vote against him? You didn't retract your vote for "no one" after the discussion on how it is scummy and gives no information? Please, tell me how that is all wrong? I mean, you said everything I said is wrong.

From a scum strategy standpoint, why would using the role block night 3 be a bad move?

Do you think Rickets is lying about being the tracker?

You should know exactly what I meant, Tib. It wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, but if they could have saved it, that would have been the smarter option, IMHO. I do think Rickets is lying about being the tracker, it just seems to convenient for me to take as a true RC.

Nice job twisting words, BTW.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

At this stage of the game you post this? IMO it is things like this that make you suspect.

At least they're not talking about going back to the scum den as they've been known to do in the past (yes, when innocent)...

 

[[AC] RICKETS]

Woo made it home in record time.

ummm were we role blocked last night? Excuse me if I missed it, but I don't remember that. I'll have to reread, but it looks like your full of :bs:

I never wanted to have to do this, but in lieu of recent events I feel that I need to make a role claim to ensure that nobody else trys to fake my role.

I am an innocent townie

Wow, you just flew up my mafia radar with these posts Scoop. I expect to be doubted, by wow. For the record I had elected to track you last night when it was blocked. Still trying to decide who is the best person to track tonight.

Anyone want to offer suggestions and reasoning?

Also, I am renegging on what I said earlier, Doc I think it better that you protect someone else than me. Tracker is not as important of a role as detective is, so better you take a swing at protecting them.

 

[[AC] Tiburon321]

You should know exactly what I meant, Tib. It wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing, but if they could have saved it, that would have been the smarter option, IMHO. I do think Rickets is lying about being the tracker, it just seems to convenient for me to take as a true RC.

Nice job twisting words, BTW.

Not twisting words at all. No need to, that is something scum does to confuse matters. You stated "So, basically, everything you've said is wrong." I am trying to discern how what I've said is wrong. I have asked pointed questions about which parts I am wrong on.

If Rickets is lying about being tracker, how come the real tracker hasn't come out to refute the claim? The tracker really doesn't have much power, so I can't imagine they'd be like omg, I can't expose myself.

 

[[AC] RICKETS]

Also, since the cat is out of the bag, my role play this game has been confrontational and jerkish to be on peoples lists. My goal was to be suspect enough not to be hit, but not so suspect I got lynched. I obviously failed, I am no IceH2O.