Mafia 88: Insane Asylum (Game Thread)

I got here very late, I ran upstairs from a meeting voted the guy in the lead who I never saw as all that trustworthy anyway. I was not going to vote now one.
 
[AC] RICKETS;2592393 said:
What a wishy washy back peddling post. First you ask the "real" tracker to speak up. That implies I AM lying. Then you say I RCed to save myself, yet the person I was up against was a team mate.... Then you say I am the Snoop, so I saved my butt by fake RCing... Then you go back to using words like suspect more likely, assuming... You either think I am scum or you don't, but I think you know very well that I am really the Tracker.

I vote to lynch Scoop

Almost of all of that was ASSUMING you were evil, I'm trying to figure out if your RC was legit or not. Your posting inclines me to think it's BS, although I could very easily be overthinking everything.

Tib will throw a vote on me next, and theres two of your remaining 3 scum ladies and gents.
 
[AC] scoop411;2592397 said:
Almost of all of that was ASSUMING you were evil, I'm trying to figure out if your RC was legit or not. Your posting inclines me to think it's BS, although I could very easily be overthinking everything.

Tib will throw a vote on me next, and theres two of your remaining 3 scum ladies and gents.
So suddenly I am your suspect again? Please at least have the courtesy of telling me why.
 
My short list for scum based on votes this past nightfall and post nightfall reactions:
Scoop
Driver
O3T
 
[AC] Tiburon321;2592395 said:
Since your reading skills seem to be suddenly lacking (amazing with all the re-reading you do), here ya go:

gracias, and that makes me feel a lot better about you. I thought you were infering to something that was indisputable, not a possibility like you describe as your reasoning for Rickets being innocent.

[AC] Tiburon321;2592392 said:
Who are you referring to with voting position?


Scoop, I'd been wanting to lean you innocent, but this post shot you right up on the scummy list. Suddenly you seem very nervous and aggressive. Grieving for Haggis?
you, also known as Tib

I'm more aggressive because I was trying to survive a possible hit last nightfall, that way I could get BH killed and then worry about my suspicions of you and Rickets. Thankfully you guys have done my dirty work for me, and come right out of the nightfall looking for a lynch.
 
[AC] Tiburon321;2592400 said:
So suddenly I am your suspect again? Please at least have the courtesy of telling me why.

you suspecting me. Keep in mind that I started the case against BH, and am the person responsible for getting him lynched. I would've appreciated to see that somewhere in your posts, as I'm curious how that could make you think I'm scum? I know i'm trying to hard to look innocent here, but why would I work to get BH lynched early in the game, and stick with it this whole time?

BTW, I'm not the detective, and please don't assume I'm implying that. (In other words, don't RC Mr. Detective who-ever you may be)
 
Known innocent in green, scum in purple. Yes, I am considering Rickets a known innocent for reasons stated prior. I think they are all coded properly, please let me know if I missed someone.

Vote Count (thru post 391) - red indicates that vote has been retracted

HH (8) - chup 277, wing 310, Tib 320, Nar 323, gold 363, Nem 368, Tree 383, mael 385
Nem (5) - Driver 261, HH 269, Gun 278, BH 292, HI IQ 361
Scoop (2) - wing 168, Doom 196, Star 274
C-note (1) - O3T 192
UhOh (1) - RICK 237
Doom (1) - UhOh 271
Tib (1) - C-note 272
Star (1) - scoop 297
O3T (0) - RICK 186
Gun (0) - BH 275
Chup (0) - HI IQ 295
Mael (0) - Nem 236
RICK (0) - HI IQ 322
Nar (0) - mael 240, gold 268

All have voted

Vote Count (thru post 726) - red indicates retracted vote

HI IQ (5) - Nar 434, O3T 458, Nem 510, Tree 525, RICK 535, chup 663
Doom (4) - wing 482, Gun 542, C-note 550, UhOh 645, Tib 722
Nem (2) - HI IQ 537, Driver 621
Tib (2) - scoop 658, BH 667
C-note (1) - Doom 460
O3T (1) - Gun 578
Driver (1) - O3T 635
Scoop (0) - Tib 558
No Lynch (2) - gold 618, mael 657

All have voted.

Vote Count (thru post 919) - red indicates retracted vote

Gun (5) - Driver 840, Tib 884, Nem 899, BH 907, UhOh 912
RICK (2) - Tree 828, wing 890
BH (2) - chup 889, scoop 894
scoop (1) - RICK 786, wing 852
Driver (1) - O3T 856
Tree (1) - nar 882
No Lynch (1) - BH 874, mael 914

No vote: gold, Gun

Vote Count (thru post 1163) - red indicates retracted vote

BH (7) - nar 979, scoop 1011, RICK 1065, mael 1108, Tib 1123, Nem 162, Driver 1163
RICK (2) - Tree 1032, UhOh 1037, Tib 1092, Nem 1093
Driver (2) - O3T 988, BH 1000
UhOh (1) - chup 1054

All have voted.
 
[AC] scoop411;2592405 said:
gracias, and that makes me feel a lot better about you. I thought you were infering to something that was indisputable, not a possibility like you describe as your reasoning for Rickets being innocent.


you, also known as Tib

I'm more aggressive because I was trying to survive a possible hit last nightfall, that way I could get BH killed and then worry about my suspicions of you and Rickets. Thankfully you guys have done my dirty work for me, and come right out of the nightfall looking for a lynch.
Please explain how my timing is interesting. I analyzed the legitimacy of Rickets' RC and (as I explained in the post where I switched my vote to Haggis) I decided it made sense and that the scum using their block on Night 3 also made sense. The fact that Haggis refuted scum using their block and is now known scum makes Rickets' claim even stronger. You also questioned why it would make sense for them to use it night 3, with some pretty weak reasoning as to why it wouldn't make sense iirc. I'll have to look back at that.

Please explain this statement, it made me lol when I read it, but I'd love to hear your explanation. Don't forget, the other townie PRs will know whether the block was used night 3. You're doing a great job digging your own grave, did HH teach you this?
 
AquariaCentral.com