Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

[[AC] C-note]

Not defending them in the least. I was questioning the vote itself not whom its on. It struck me as an attempt to bury a vote.

Voting someone who isn't contributing to the game seems like a thrown vote.

I don't see how there is really enoug content to look into period, unless you are basing your vote on their absence.

Your very first comment was that it was a thrown vote BECAUSE it was on someone who wasn't contributing. Your second response had nothing to do with my original statement.


To the bold: from my perspective you did not. Lab actually dug into the fact that Tank voted because of the phantom "trains" DDay started. You focused on the fact that DDay was absent. Even in your response to Jm you said you saw it as an "attempt to bury a vote." Would you consider Kash's vote on 2H to be a buried vote?

fair enough, my wording is poor. My main concern with Tank's vote is the fact that it is random and on an off player, yes to me it looks like an attempt to toss a vote to protect themself from having to make a game effecting decision. Yes I'm aware that Labby brought up the "train" bit, but AGAIN my concern with Tanks vote had nothing to do with on whom the vote was placed but the fact that it was a wasted vote.

As to Kash's vote on 2H, yes it appears tossed but I'd need to read further into their interaction and posts to make a solid opinion.

 

[[AC] C-note]

^^ ignore those first posts... my multiquote is still jacked up

 

[rich311k]

There are 4 single votes, one is yours. What makes that one so special.

 

[user_name]

comment on since you posted that you were rereading over 2 hours ago, however my gut says that it would be a waste of time with your track record of ignoring questions.

sorry, my friend showed up and hour early for our run... will answer it in a sec

 

[[AC] C-note]

There are 4 single votes, one is yours. What makes that one so special.

mine?

 

[[AC] Doomsday998]

This is the part where I realize I should never have signed up and say "I withdraw from the game." Then I say sorry to my fellow players and hope that after a summer long break I will be capable of playing properly again... So, sorry, this was a mistake to start playing, hate me if you want, I'm still leaving the game. BTW, you were all off, I'm just a stupid townie.

It's just a game FF. I hope you get things handled, it sounds like you're under some stress. We'll be here when you're ready to play again.

well that was alott to catch up on. sorry to see you go ff... now we are one step back from the word go. i just read most of the thread and im just going to sayit rather than pull every post. D-Day i dont like how you are trying to start trains on people.. first you tryto start a case on jm but wehn that dosent work you switch over to ff that started to work and you forced him out of the game. all seems scummy to me therefore my vote is on you

I VOTE TO LYNCH D-DAY

I posted a single sentence towards him. If you think I'm scum and our plan is to drive the town crazy to the point that they quit. You are drastically over estimating my gameplay.

Talk about flimsy cases.

 

[jpappy789]

So when I said this...

You would be better off actually questioning the reasoning behind tank's vote than any attempt to hide, especially at this point in the game when the votes tend to be more widespread anyways. Again, an absent person is not immune from the vote. I'm not saying that DDay him/herself has anything to do with that...



I have but the fact still remains that any lynched innocent turned zombie has the option to use the hit. That fits with what Razz said...

And your response was this...

He admits that his vote is a stretch so I agree that there isn't much to vote on, UNLESS Tank is casting his vote based on DDays absence not BECAUSE of their absence.






That is what was getting at with my questions to Tank

Why would you now say this?

fair enough, my wording is poor. My main concern with Tank's vote is the fact that it is random and on an off player, yes to me it looks like an attempt to toss a vote to protect themself from having to make a game effecting decision. Yes I'm aware that Labby brought up the "train" bit, but AGAIN my concern with Tanks vote had nothing to do with on whom the vote was placed but the fact that it was a wasted vote.

As to Kash's vote on 2H, yes it appears tossed but I'd need to read further into their interaction and posts to make a solid opinion.

You never questioned the reasoning behind the vote and now you're back to the idea that the vote was somehow wasted. Are we all supposed to ignore the low posters and just railroad the talkative players?

 

[rich311k]

mine?

No doom's. Sorry about that horrible wording.

 

[noodles62]

Maybe you have missed the past day or so but I've questioned Razz about as much as anyone. That being said I am not going to twist that particular post against him. What are you trying to imply here?

I am not trying to imply anything. You just seemed a little defensive of Razz after I voted for him and it struck me as odd.
Regardless, I have been reading over things again and I believe I have found something else that piques my interest. I do not have the time to pull quotes (I have a meeting shortly) but for now I retract my vote on Razz

 

[[AC] C-note]

Not defending them in the least. I was questioning the vote itself not whom its on. It struck me as an attempt to bury a vote.

is this not in english?

So when I said this...
And your response was this...
Why would you now say this?
You never questioned the reasoning behind the vote and now you're back to the idea that the vote was somehow wasted. Are we all supposed to ignore the low posters and just railroad the talkative players?

He didn't question a low poster he straight up threw the vote out, questions would have been different.