Mafia 92: Night of the living Mafia... the play

Isn't that an implied statement when you put out the other scenarios? Does everything have to be typed out?

No I'm not labeling anyone scum,just listing the possibilities of IF one is scum how the other 2 could fit into the scenario.

Look at your quote below. You specifically say "doubt all 3 are mafia", which implies that at least one is. Right?

I agree and disagree, yes there won't be much info and without info the hit would probably be misplaced but at the same time how many times have you had a gut feeling about someone but had no way to prove it and were right. I'd hate to be lynched and not be able to take a shot especially if it turns out I was right about who I wanted to hit. I guess what I'm saying is just use your own judgement.

On that note I do think I'll watch you 3, doubt all 3 are mafia as the posting is to close but I could see Mad being mafia and thinking up the idea or Rich or Doom being mafia latching onto an innocent Mad idea.
 
I believe so but I couldn't tell if those couple of quotes that were there was everything or not...was there more UN?

From his post, I gathered that his multi-quote wasn't working so he was going to adding some quotes in a later post. Since then, though, he seems to be waiting around to hear from Noods and LG.
 
Look at your quote below. You specifically say "doubt all 3 are mafia", which implies that at least one is. Right?


Semantics. I explained the post in more detail later on and its been pulled twice for viewing pleasure. If you're so sure then vote me.
 
[AC] C-note;2644060 said:
lab was getting at that the vote was on DDay....I was getting at the act of voting itself.
No, I did not care that the vote was on Doom, I cared that Tank was trying to say that Doom was causing a train, etc, when clearly there was no train caused by him. Some of the wording he used struck me as scummy, though it could just be inexperience showing through, looking scummy when really Tank just doesn't know what a train looks like. Seems to me you're trying to twist a lot of things there, C-note.

I've found myself agreeing with Noods a bit, but the way she's gone after Razz's wording and is twisting things herself makes me really wonder about her. At this point I'm not ready to vote for her, but she seems more aggressive than the Noods I'm used to.

Tonight I've got a work dinner to attend so I will miss nightfall, unfortunately. I'm going to vote now, though I'm not super comfortable with it. I vote to lynch C-note, they seem very wish washy and flipping things around.
 
There is a lot busier a 1st day then I remember in past games. No one person has me feeling any better about them then another. Its a lot of digging though so I do like this and should help in the following days.

A lot of reaching but its Day 1, I can see where Noods is going and it wouldn't be the 1st time mafia slipped on day 1 but I can also see how it could be just badly worded.

There really is to much going on to just sit and post about it all. If you have a certain question about a certain player and what I'm thinking I'll read those interactions and answer.

Right now Mad and Doom are my top 2. Razz a distant 3rd because it could be a slip but Mad is voting him(?) and I don't think as close as the voting is that it would be distancing.

I'm getting an Ice/Razz team vibe from this. You seem awfully soft on razz here, almost apologetic ("but mad is voting him").
 
Semantics. I explained the post in more detail later on and its been pulled twice for viewing pleasure. If you're so sure then vote me.

Here's the thing. I'm not sure. If you didn't come looking for me, we wouldn't be having this discussion at this time. You on the other hand are so confident in your first choice that it's caused you to make your third choice a distant third. Kinda odd that you'd be so confident.
 
[AC] Doomsday998;2644085 said:
I'm getting an Ice/Razz team vibe from this. You seem awfully soft on razz here, almost apologetic ("but mad is voting him").


You're funny... If it weren't for you and Mad trying to make something out of nothing and dragging it till it bleeds my vote would probably be on Razz as its something I'd take a Day 1 vote chance on. I won't vote with a suspect, same way I wouldn't vote JM if I thought the case against him was good because you are on him.
 
You're funny... If it weren't for you and Mad trying to make something out of nothing and dragging it till it bleeds my vote would probably be on Razz as its something I'd take a Day 1 vote chance on. I won't vote with a suspect, same way I wouldn't vote JM if I thought the case against him was good because you are on him.

Even if it was the best available case? Just curious.
 
You're funny... If it weren't for you and Mad trying to make something out of nothing and dragging it till it bleeds my vote would probably be on Razz as its something I'd take a Day 1 vote chance on. I won't vote with a suspect, same way I wouldn't vote JM if I thought the case against him was good because you are on him.

I'm dragging it until it bleeds? That's funny. I woke up to your vote this morning based on some really crap logic. Then FF hops on, so I decide to pick the logic apart. What was I thinking?
 
Ok, now im all confused and flustered, I will do my best to explain

I was concerned with the fact that Tank just dumped off a vote on a non contributing player, it seems like he was trying to just toss the vote away to avoid making a decision.
-does the fact that it was a low poster have to do with anything? -- Only in the sense that at the time many people (including myself) had low post count, but putting that vote on the lowest person would have drawn more attention, so I believe that Tank picked a "moderatly" low poster and voted there.
[AC] C-note;2644060 said:
lab was getting at that the vote was on DDay....I was getting at the act of voting itself.
In regards to this post, I was referring to that Labby brought up Tanks reason for the vote, that there was a train, not that the train was Labbys reason for possibly voting for Tank.

I hope this clears things up.
 
AquariaCentral.com