what game play? the 11 post that you have that contribute nothing to the town for rooting out scum?
A bit hypocritical, no? You have one more post than DDay and have basically gone after them for the few posts that are actually game related.
what game play? the 11 post that you have that contribute nothing to the town for rooting out scum?
I don't see anything apologetic here. I see Ice not wanting to vote along those he suspects. I don't understand why Ice puts Razz as a distant third on his list though. Ice, are you so confident in Mad/Doom to list Razz as "distant"?
It seems better to lynch a person who is scum. Scum "contribute" by muddying the waters and may look active. I know this isn't your first game Razz, was this another slip?
what game play? the 11 post that you have that contribute nothing to the town for rooting out scum?
C-note, I still am not following how you think that voting off a person who isn't helping the town is worse than voting off a contributer. While yes I would like to vote off either Ice or Mad but I can't decide who is mafia (if either) so my vote will likely not land on them tonight. So now looking into other players, why not vote for someone who isn't helping the town all that much? IMO, (without any leads, gut feelings or slips) an unhelpful person seems like a better person to lynch over someone who is contributing. Would you agree with that?
I'll be back with a few posts in a little bit.
[AC] Doomsday998;2644140 said:There's voting with your suspects, and there's voting one of your suspects that your suspects also suspect. Subtle difference, but real. Ice is very wishy washy in his post about razz, he doesn't end up really saying anything at all other than It could a slip but maybe not. Why post that? There's no reason for it except to make it seem like he's being hard on crime.
You realize you have 12 right? Besides, post count is pretty much irrelevant. Any monkey can pound out 30 posts in a day.