Mafia 93: Tank of Terror! Freshwater Version

[Ninja Pigs Rock]

Quick question since you seem to think I'm scum, where have you been questioning me? All I can see since night are questions from me to you.... Have you been talking about me in the scum den?

the good guys hadn't had an invest yet, so the good guys wouldn't yet know. The bad guys know who each other are, therefore they also know who they aren't. If you're not bad, then you're good. If LG was bad she would know that AAF was good. That would make her scum. You then said, that I am calling her "scum/tank." As if they were the same thing.

sorry i believed that the good guys got an invest my mistake.

 

[Ninja Pigs Rock]

ignore the post pulled from razz

 

[Ninja Pigs Rock]

You really like that word don't you?

how about blame, charge, point the finger at, incriminate. take your pick Razz!!!

 

[RazzleFish]

how about blame, charge, point the finger at, incriminate. take your pick Razz!!!

I was thinking more along the lines of "suspect(ing)" but do what you wish.

 

[Ninja Pigs Rock]

I was thinking more along the lines of "suspect(ing)" but do what you wish.

oh suspecting how could i of missed suspecting.

 

[rich311k]

Did we change games? I thought we were supposed to suspect, blame, point fingers, etc.? Of course it really only works if the suspect answers and asks their own questions.

 

[Ninja Pigs Rock]

Did we change games? I thought we were supposed to suspect, blame, point fingers, etc.? Of course it really only works if the suspect answers and asks their own questions.

then lets get to it

 

[Dangerdoll]

Rich has pretty much already said what (or similar to) what I am thinking after reading through, but I am going to add my thoughts on this anyway...if anyone wants to see it as "following, so be it.

I find it pretty interesting the ones on AAF...he is new and yes there are plenty of times newbs are scum, but day one is pretty harsh to be voted off, when still trying to figure the game out. I'm not saying newbs should always get a pass, but to jump on one day one, I just don't see it. I always think it best to keep a eye on them, give a little guidance, and see where it goes from there. Not everyone reads the games (fully), I know I didn't and I still don't if I'm not in them. Normally, if they get through day one nightfall and you see how it works you get a better grasp and understand it a bit more.


Lab, you know I think your awesome...but this gives me a red flag here, instead of offering any thoughts or help you just throw out there "read some old games"...really until you try it and get your feet wet, you just don't get it sometimes. It seemd someone with the towns (tanks) best interest in mind would want to help others to understand a little more.


Why? Doll your vote has me the most concerned right now. You are a true vet (been playing longer then me) so you really should understand the whole "going after a newb" no-no.


So, why is it worth pointing out that I (and Zaff) hadn't posted yet, I already said I wouldn't be around. I do like how you put "I don't know what to make of it, but thought I'd point it out"...is that to try and get someone else to "jump" on it", looking for some support to go forward with it??

Do you really think UN decided..."Hey I'm going to start to dig my pond after night one so I don't have to post"?

It's funny how you seem to "call out" UN, then turn around and question Ninja about his post toward UN.

Razz, you look to be pointing at many "nothings" here, it looks pretty much like you are just throwing things out there to see if anyone else jumps on it and backs you so you can go forward with more accusations.

the reason I voted AAF is because it seemed blatantly obvious that he was mafia in my eyes. He was here, seemingly acting as a full blown game 3 instead of game 93 noob putting out posts as if he had never read nor heard of mafia before in his life. I think he may have even said that.... then admits to reading 2 threads.... makes a statement that a tie results in a no death in the night as if he knew more than he was trying to get credit for. Then Razz was tooling along explaining out the whole game and giving lessons on what is supposed to happen, what he needs to do and yadda yadda.

and the whole Noob no-no on day 1 thing, nice try but the mafia can be a clever bunch. We have been fooled before by plenty of people and they have used tactics that would completely flip us out making for a remarkable game play..... so trust is out the door and so are "no-no's". I put nothing past the mafia. I voted him because as I stated already last night, he or she seemed to be one of the "hiding in the plain open" scums, using the whole noob thing to their advantage. Maybe I am too used to how Ice or Mad would play the dice, I don't know but the plain facts are that I really felt like AAF was mafia and was mocking us in the open sea.

I question those that missed this when I voted...... and I question why folks are so suspicious of a Day 1 vote.

 

[RazzleFish]

the reason I voted AAF is because it seemed blatantly obvious that he was mafia in my eyes. He was here, seemingly acting as a full blown game 3 instead of game 93 noob putting out posts as if he had never read nor heard of mafia before in his life. I think he may have even said that.... then admits to reading 2 threads.... makes a statement that a tie results in a no death in the night as if he knew more than he was trying to get credit for. Then Razz was tooling along explaining out the whole game and giving lessons on what is supposed to happen, what he needs to do and yadda yadda.

and the whole Noob no-no on day 1 thing, nice try but the mafia can be a clever bunch. We have been fooled before by plenty of people and they have used tactics that would completely flip us out making for a remarkable game play..... so trust is out the door and so are "no-no's". I put nothing past the mafia. I voted him because as I stated already last night, he or she seemed to be one of the "hiding in the plain open" scums, using the whole noob thing to their advantage. Maybe I am too used to how Ice or Mad would play the dice, I don't know but the plain facts are that I really felt like AAF was mafia and was mocking us in the open sea.

I question those that missed this when I voted...... and I question why folks are so suspicious of a Day 1 vote.

I understand what you're saying and it is very possable that a mafia team that contained at least one vet would come up with that but it's too bad that wasn't the case. As for being suspicious of your vote, honestly what else is there to go on? The game has been painfully slow and Day 2 hasn't been any better so, yes, votes are what matter. I really hope things pick up quickly or Day 2 doesn't have a lot of hope for being better than Day 1...

 

[Lady G]

Your posting on this topic comes across to me as if you knew (s)he would flip tank and are scolding people for voting him/her.

Your post seem to be trying to make it look like something it is not to me Zaff. I never said I thought or knew he would be innocent, I said I thought it was pretty interesting the way some seemed to jump on a newb, on day one like they did. Nice try at twisting my post there

Actually zaf she was questioning all of the people who voted AAF because she didn't think they had good enough reason. Obviouly she thought AAF was innocent or she would of voted him.

So, you are anti-tank then? You wish for harm to come to the tank? Is this correct?

Where do you get he is anti tank from that Zaff?

the good guys hadn't had an invest yet, so the good guys wouldn't yet know. The bad guys know who each other are, therefore they also know who they aren't. If you're not bad, then you're good. If LG was bad she would know that AAF was good. That would make her scum. You then said, that I am calling her "scum/tank." As if they were the same thing.

Didn't you just say that everyone is tank? Now you are twisting again? Are you purposely trying to confuse Ninja and get him acting silly trying to figure out which way you are coming from...looks like you are trying to make a easy target out of someone.

the reason I voted AAF is because it seemed blatantly obvious that he was mafia in my eyes. He was here, seemingly acting as a full blown game 3 instead of game 93 noob putting out posts as if he had never read nor heard of mafia before in his life. I think he may have even said that.... then admits to reading 2 threads.... makes a statement that a tie results in a no death in the night as if he knew more than he was trying to get credit for. Then Razz was tooling along explaining out the whole game and giving lessons on what is supposed to happen, what he needs to do and yadda yadda.

and the whole Noob no-no on day 1 thing, nice try but the mafia can be a clever bunch. We have been fooled before by plenty of people and they have used tactics that would completely flip us out making for a remarkable game play..... so trust is out the door and so are "no-no's". I put nothing past the mafia. I voted him because as I stated already last night, he or she seemed to be one of the "hiding in the plain open" scums, using the whole noob thing to their advantage. Maybe I am too used to how Ice or Mad would play the dice, I don't know but the plain facts are that I really felt like AAF was mafia and was mocking us in the open sea.

I question those that missed this when I voted...... and I question why folks are so suspicious of a Day 1 vote.

When is ANYTHING blatantly obvious in these games Doll?
What is different from being a newb in game 3 or game 93?
Yes, we have been fooled before...we also have frowned upon going after a newb so badly on day one, without offering any help to understand before hand.