I've been looking through Zaffy's posts, and came across this gem. Here Zaffy calls out MC for looking to build a case based on a "narrow concept" than on their actions. Then he placed and defended a vote on UN for what reason again?What does it means "LYLO?"
Reading through MC's posts gives me the feeling that he's more interested in building a case because of a narrow concept, rather than the overall picture of what someone is doing.
The whole town, scum and townies were piled onto 3 people for night 1, in a 21 person game. All 3 of them were perfectly fine places to hide. I don't see how anyone can really form an argument that one was better than the other. At least without other evidence to support it.
I can't understand how it was better to hide on FF than DD or Spencer, all 3 were perfectly good suspects for a day 1, and that shows because everyone was on them.
What is special about the votes near nightdfall? I saw people trying not to break the tie, you see people trying hide. I'm of the opinion that if you see something scummy, then vote for them.
Which is why,
I vote to lynch MC
Must be! But, honestly, when you have 16 out of 21 people voting on 2 suspects, and everyone seems fine with it, you have to wonder a little.
It just doesn't make sense, I get the feeling that MC just wanted to make a case for the sake of making a case, and grabbed onto the idea of late voters just because it sounds insidious.
Up until this point (post 1056) Zaffy has only pointed fingers at people who have been proven innocent (FF, AAF, Spencer, Wiz...).