Mafia 97: Patrick Mafia, Crazy for Swayze the game

[dundadundun]

and she cries anyway...

 

[jbradt]

and she cries anyway...

So does UN... you just have to let it go...


:rofl:

 

[the wizard]

I'm not saying to give anyone a pass. I'm just saying that for a player of Mad's caliber to throw a vote out so early and for such a questionable reason seems really out of the norm to me. If that same vote had come from another player for the same reason, I may not have noticed at all. Hell, I've been on board with lynching more than one newb on day 1. I just don't see it this time, and it seems to me like Mad was taking the easy way out. That's not like him IMO.

Also, my intent was never to defend anyone. I was just calling out Mad. You guys can read it as defending if you want, but that's coming from you, not from me. You guys have all seen me defend people. If you really believe that I would defend AAF as a teammate on day 1, you must have bumped your heads. When I defend someone, there won't be a question about it.

Fair enough, maybe you weren't defending him, it does seem like there is a lot of concern over AAF though. The question is why and who is trying to keep him in the game?

To be honest, I was thinking along the same lines as Mad but didn't want to vote early as I didn't have to work today and wanted to see what developed. Had I needed to vote before work it would have gone to AAF.

 

[dundadundun]

So does UN... you just have to let it go...


:rofl:

horrible.
just.


horrible.

:rofl:

 

[jbradt]

Fair enough, maybe you weren't defending him, it does seem like there is a lot of concern over AAF though. The question is why and who is trying to keep him in the game?

To be honest, I was thinking along the same lines as Mad but didn't want to vote early as I didn't have to work today and wanted to see what developed. Had I needed to vote before work it would have gone to AAF.

Which way are you leaning now? I realize you'll vote me to tie it up, but if you weren't on the block, who would you vote for?

 

[the wizard]

Nightfall isn't for a few hours if I am remembering correctly but I feel better getting a vote in now.

I vote to lynch Wiz

I think his comments about my post are a bit odd, just that he threw it out there that I could be actually using code in that post. Not something super scummy but it could be just a way to get a name out there and see if anyone bites.

JP, you know as well as everyone else that isn't my style. If I want to see if I can get people to vote someone I place a vote with a reason at the time.

It seemed like it was time to discuss the game. I saw something and mentioned it. That, if I remember correctly, is how we open discussion. You questioned me about it and apparently didn't like the response when I explained the thought process that was going through my head at the time of my original post.

 

[Madcrawdad]

Mad... the way I see it, AAF used a weak defense. Then he came back to give the real reason because he realized that this is the same type of situation that gets him lynched every game. Then he got all caught up in it. I'm not saying that it's any sign of his alignment one way or the other, just that it seems a pretty flimsy premise to base a vote on. Even for day one.

Flimsy for D1? I don't think so. The guy supposedly doesn't want to bring RL issues into the game. Fine. Yet the simple mention of his name brings them pouring out. The whole premise of the game is for scum to want to blend in. With just a little attention, AAF abandons his supposed desire for privacy (does an about-face within 2 minutes). Seems as though he doesn't like attention.

i vote to lynch madcrawdad
i dont see what he's getting at

There's a surprise. Why wait all day for that?

 

[the wizard]

Which way are you leaning now? I realize you'll vote me to tie it up, but if you weren't on the block, who would you vote for?

From what I have seen in the thread at this point, I would flip a coin between AAF and UN and be confident no matter which way it fell.

 

[jbradt]

Flimsy for D1? I don't think so. The guy supposedly doesn't want to bring RL issues into the game. Fine. Yet the simple mention of his name brings them pouring out. The whole premise of the game is for scum to want to blend in. With just a little attention, AAF abandons his supposed desire for privacy (does an about-face within 2 minutes). Seems as though he doesn't like attention.



There's a surprise. Why wait all day for that?

Ok. You call out what you see, and I'll call out what I see. Isn't that another point of the game?

 

[jbradt]

From what I have seen in the thread at this point, I would flip a coin between AAF and UN and be confident no matter which way it fell.

That confident on D1, eh? Hmmm...