For the benefit of rule skimmers, we can trust the headline 100% on N2 and N3. The blogger can't muck with it until after N3.
So Dawg, has your opinion on Kash changed?
No one else has a reference to water in their name and the headline said water is safe.
I vote to send Kash to the looney bin
This game is getting bad. Not enough posting going on. I'm going to be voting for a low poster tonight. Right now that's Kash. I could also see myself voting for Zaffy right now. I know it's not the best strategy but with no one posting there's not much else to go on. I still see FF as a possibility for my vote tonight as well.
Tough to say actually. I need to do some more reading. I've been drinking a lot of beer and watching a lot of football tonight. I'm rooting for the Niners and the Pats so it's been a good night so far. I didn't pick up the Ice reference at first either.So Dawg, has your opinion on Kash changed?
No one else has a reference to water in their name and the headline said water is safe.
Zaffy and yourself both had only 5 posts at the time I made my comment. I believe Bally was low as well but she tends to UD quite often so I left her off. FF was not about being a low poster but more for his posting. Kash, I'd like to know if you started playing the game because you had time or because I called out the low posters. You don't really need to answer that question because I probably won't believe you anyway.I have a follow-up question to ask, Dawg.
Tell us who the "low posters" were that you were considering at that particular time. It would take an awful lot of back-tracking for me to figure out the lowest posters now and factor in the posts that have been made in between then and now. And since you apparently contemplated between us, you should be able to answer this quite easily.
Bally, for example. I'm sure she would have been one of the lowest posters too. Yet, you preferred me being sent to the looney bin over her for some reason. Who else was with me on your list of low posters when you voted? I'm curious to see who else you chose me over for your vote besides those you mentioned in your post (Zaffy and FF).
Zaffy and yourself both had only 5 posts at the time I made my comment. I believe Bally was low as well but she tends to UD quite often so I left her off. FF was not about being a low poster but more for his posting. Kash, I'd like to know if you started playing the game because you had time or because I called out the low posters. You don't really need to answer that question because I probably won't believe you anyway.![]()
Yup I remember Bally having 3 posts...don't think she ever posted again after my comment. I find it funny that you went from 5 posts to the top poster in one afternoon, Kash.
I understand your job interferes and yes I do know first hand as you suggest. However, I never said it made you more suspicious those are your words.No reason not to answer your question, Dawg. It hardly matters whether you believe me or not either as other players will each make their own judgement.
My job interferes with every game I play. That isn't just during the workday either as I end up having to stay late and/or work some weekends. So no, I couldn't do much of anything until I got done running errands this morning.
That said, I wonder how you equate post count to role assignment in my case. You and have been evil together so I KNOW that you know firsthand how badly my game (and post count) suffered in other games. The last two times I've been evil, I've had to accept stupid lynches I could easily have avoided if only I'd been able to post during the daytime.
Still, you're suggesting to everyone now that a lack of participation until Saturday came along somehow relates to me being more suspicious?
1. If I'm innocent, doesn't it hold true that not banishing me to the looney bin could benefit the town? Perhaps a tad more than someone like Bally?
2. If I'm evil, how exactly would YOU be able to tell that from my posts just because there weren't many of them until today?