Mafia #99: The ACville Files- Game Thread

updated

Kash - Dawg(438) Noods(508) Ice(512) Zaff(533)Lab (556)
Dun - Dawg(328) JB(386)
Dawg -AAF(485)
Zaff -Kashta (525) Wiz (555)
JB-Dun (560)

no vote DD
 
I haven't been able to keep up as much as I would have liked. Anyone have a vote count handy?
 
Wow... so, Ice and Pappy are both psychic...

That puts an interesting twist on things.
 
I understand your job interferes and yes I do know first hand as you suggest. However, I never said it made you more suspicious those are your words.

As far as you VS. Bally...you would rather I voted for a UD?

I couldn't tell if you were evil from your lack of posting. However I thought that the scum were probably hiding in a game where not much posting was going on. I found it odd that you started posting after I called you out and voted you for it. I also know from playing a scum with you that you tend to spend a lot of time defending yourself as scum and not enough time calling people out. I'm getting more of a feeling that you really are scum.
This is pretty telling. This is what I was having an issue with yesterday and why I was more so leaning on Kash being scummy.

That "sounds" like a good answer, however.... the problem I have with it is if you are evil then my lack of posting serves as a good "excuse" for you to add your vote to DD's vote against me knowing full well that the town might follow along without questioning your motives. The two of you (if both evil) might then be able to get me institutionalized..... saving you from having to use up a hit to take me out.... also enabling you to target someone else who might foil your scummy plans. A twofer kind of deal like that is appealing for the scum whenever I'm innocent.

The other faulty part of your logic here is the idea that you'd seek out evil from among the low posters in a game that's incredibly LOW in posting across the board. Out of all the people not posting much (me included) only 4 of the players in this game are scum. Low posting is a lousy discriminator to rely on when... (1) most everyone in the game is being quiet, (2) the players not posting a whole lot thus far also includes innocents and townie PRs we wouldn't want to lose by mistake, and (3) that part you've just acknowledged that there really isn't a reliable correlation between my post count and my alignment.
this kinda added some glue to it because you are usually much more attentive than this. I believe Dawg voted you before me and here you are making it seem like was following my vote.... sheesh and you say I am manipulative?? really...

That was Lab Rat's post; not mine.

And yes, you've based your entire game on one thing. A single first post from me where I said it looked like a great game and asked Noods what she named her new kitten.

Clearly, that was not a game-related post in any stretch of the imagination. How on earth does a post like that indicate anyone's role assignment? You're full of beans, DD.
sorry about that. I am sorry if I don't have the luxury lately due to unforseen circumstances when I signed up for the game to be a little more expansive in everything but the fact remains. The more I see from you, the more I like voting for you, so yes... my game has been focused on you because you keep my thoughts right there. Is that your plan? Are you willing to sacrifice your team because you and your team have taken so many of us out already?

and as far as your post that I noted on, I said it was weird because it didn't fit in where you put it. It stuck out like a sore thumb. Yes, it was off topic while everyone else's posts were off topic of the game, but the topic of the moment in the game was Christmas presents and everyone talking about what they got. Did you ever give a list?

So is your problem that I am willing to vote my best suspect instead of following the pack to picking between two I am unsure of? Or is it that you could be the one my vote falls on?
No, my problem is you are willing to throw you vote willy nilly than to work with the town.

as far as Zaffy is concerned, I don't see why anyone is really voting him except for the fact that he is asking them questions.... one that comes to mind is AAF.

For now in lieu of time, I vote to send Kash to the loony bin
 
Beginning to wonder if the Wiz/Kash thing was distancing..

Then we have AAF list looking a lot like Kashs and Dun staying out of the whole mess and voting JB.......
 
Beginning to wonder if the Wiz/Kash thing was distancing..

Then we have AAF list looking a lot like Kashs and Dun staying out of the whole mess and voting JB.......
I was wondering about that too.
 
I was able to make it back earlier than anticipated. Nightfall will still be at 10 but I will catch up and get an official vote count posted soon.

Edit: or I will just confirm what Ice has above...


Not enough beers in the world huh
 
Wouldn't you be losing a townie if you were innocent?

i see what you're doing here. however, if i'm not voted off, whether i'm innocent or not has no bearing on whether we lose a townie.

now, what i think you're asking here is if JBs push to vote me off had worked, would we be losing a townie. you're asking me to RC, then in a sense. would it matter if i were townie or scum how i'd answer this question? i may be slow, but i'm not stupid. i'd like to think i'd catch on regardless what side i'm on and claim innocent. i think all of our better players would.

besides, if i were voted off, i'd lose a town and you'd lose a townie.
 
AquariaCentral.com