Mafia Game #4 The Play

[NeonJulie]

1. Cory Lover- Everyone has stated the reasons. I concur.
2. Madcrawdad- Because the posts all seem to come in "bursts" and seem to be steering us in a particular direction and the directions have changed.
3. TBD

I would like to see more from the "lurkers"... SHK, bkw, Max, Coler, and Sov. I'm getting nervous that there are very few posts from y'all.

Ok, so again, Judgemax, it looks like you've dropped off the last 6 pages or so, since others being calling you a lurker again. I'm waiting to see the trail pick up. In fact, you're put in the same place as Coler, and I'm thinking this is the point in the game where the tide's about to turn...

 

[NeonJulie]

I suspect that each member of the mafia has been given a role based on previous posting history and style. Because of our tendancy to attack those with many posts, most of the mafia are basically sitting on their butts laughing at us right now.

About the Don, I highly suspect that this cagey player has told the Don to be almost invisible. Make a few posts, make some votes, make a case, but do NOT under any circumstances say anything without approval.

Based on our former expert (Sorry Ogre *chuckle*) I would have to say: this sounds a lot like Coler? (well, at least the 'almost visible' part, because what "approval" or "directions" they are given outside the thread are a big question mark.)

 

[NeonJulie]

We must be prepared to implement a better plan than everyone lynching one player tomorrow.

Again, a word from our former expert. *lol* And yet, it does seem that's exactly what every day of voting has been like. Everyone line up, vote for-so-and-so... or you're probably mafia. So hence, you get 10, 12, 14, 16 whatever votes for the same person. Probably the largest trains ever to be led down the tracks of ACVille.

 

[NeonJulie]

I dont think CL is mafia i also don't think he is mayor...it's obvious he is tryin to save himself. My top two stll remain Zsandman and Charlie, if you need me to go into detail go read my previous post, if you need more detail just ask.

Ok, another one, consistent, information-less, and zeroed in on Zsandman, and Charlie, who he picked from the first day, largely based on a low standing accusation of difference in play style. Even after everyone here has already said that CL's weak attempt nearly asking to be lynched or whacked ("I'm the ma....." with of course no ensuing predictions common to a mayor player) there can be little doubt as to CL's guilt. (Most votes have already fallen that way, and they would be found right, but not BKW, he's still busying himself with Charlie, who hadn't done anything on my radar, and Zs, who seemed to me, just to play a forthright, inyourface, and logical game, with some pizazz thrown in.)

P.S. Where have Coler and Judgemax been, in the past 14 or so pages now? I believe Coler may have said he'd be out of town. These are just estimates, but I'm cruising along at page 44. Less than half way there folks!

 

[NeonJulie]

Ok,first off, for those of you that do not know me, I am FEMALE, lol, my name is Julie,Secondly, I posted in an earlier post that I wouldn't be on much fri, or sat., I am a officer for The local F.O.E, I had to paint an assemble an entire float, to be ready by sat morn at 10:00am, I also have 5 dogs, two small children, 7 fish tanks, and run a small photography business out of my home, I re-home dogs, and had a special case brought to me yes. eve., AND I mod for a bully breed board, I am trying to pack to move, lmao, I am busy! I am not choosing when I post, I am simply posting when I can.

As promised, here are a couple of folks currently tweaking on my mafia radar...

JudgeMax
For reasons listed by Ogre yesterday

Here Ogre claims to be setting a trap. Thanks for tossing me in for bait, old boy.


Immediately JudgeMax bites with this one saying that it would make sense if Julie were given a special mafia role.as stated before, i had my own suspicions, I didn't ask anyone else to vote for them, I was just stating that IMO they seemed to be acting funny..I have not tried to sway any votes either, I was simply stating what I was thinking...

Julie counters with this regarding random assignment of roles. Make sense to me.


Then Judge points out that even with random assigments, her original statement still makes sense. NOT TO ME. Unless of course, rbishop is cheating.
I am not saying rbishop is cheating, i would never call someone a cheat, I was saying, strategically, If It weren't random, it would be the perfect play.

Ever seen this before? Folks whispering other people's names and 'mafia' at the same time. JudgeMax is one to watch.

I have stated that I am not mafia, I can say it again, but what would that really do?..make me look just as guilty, I can also assure you, for those that might be wondering, I am also not the mayor, or any other special role, I am simply smart, and did what all of you are doing, following hunches, I did not jump on any lynch trains, I went with what I stated from the get go, I still believe NJ is acting suspicious, I am entitled to think that, its the name of the game , elimination, you figure out who is who , bu the process of elimination.

That said, Ice was the detective, he could have investigated me, if he really wanted, I am sure he could have lynched me, or led a lynch train on me, With a vote from him and NJ, If you all felt I was that suspicious of a character, you should have voted for me, It wouldn't have changed the innocent dead count at all. (nor the mafia, for those that need that spelled out)

I think we all really need to smarten up, We lost the detective, we are in TROUBLEif we can't get our acts together, Now I only have one other question, I agree with wanting to know what everyone else is thinking, but I wouldn't keep posting lists of suspects, If you get them all right, do you really think they are going to lynch that particular person?..Um no, because we will then vote for everyone on that list, and that would be a stupid move on their part. I suggest, we maybe name one, and our reasoning, that way, you can still see what other people are thinking, and become less of a mafia pawn by doing so.

Ah, here's again why you're called the lurker, been away, so you're back from the FOE or whatever it is. Now... this must be where the clue dropping begins. So... you defend each statement line by line, from MadCrawdad, by claiming that you're suspicious of several people, myself included. You agree wanting to know what everyone else is thinking... but this is a new turn for the game.

You 'wouldn't keep posting lists of suspects.' Most people agree this is a logic game, and that you try and match up your top 3/5 to the guy next to you's 3/5, and see who often the most common denominator ends up being. But you say - don't anyone declare you suspicions. I admit I'm completely lost as to why you say this. "If you get them all right, do you really think they are going to lynch that particular person?..Um no, because we will then vote for everyone on that list, and that would be a stupid move on their part."

My brain's feeling foggy, time for more calories. I really don't understand this, but you've confused me from the get go. 'If you get them right... do you think they are going to lynch that person?' Who are we talking about? 'Um no, because we will then vote for everyone on that list.' I'm trying....... 'that would be a stupid move on their part.' Who's part again? You never mention ANY names? Not even any roles. Are we talking Mafia? Innocents? US? THEM?!

And strangely enough, haven't you done exactly that? Rolled out 6-whatever names, and now, everyone's 'going to lynch that person?' I'm not throwing your whole list under the bus - after reviewing just preliminary things, as I've felt from before, Coler is definitely not playing as I've seen him play Innocent. But it's strange that you tell us to do things, then you turn around later and do the exact opposite.

Do they train you to portray total inconsistency? Is this a ploy to confuse the criminals??

 

[NeonJulie]

Because I have to say, it's not just working on the supposed 'criminals', it's doing a job on my thought process. You'd expect an exemplary game leader to follow through on what they say, not to do the exact opposite.

 

[NeonJulie]

I am not getting what you are saying here?..Why would dd be clear for you unless you know, because you are in the mafia. we are all guilty in this game until we are killed, and shown otherwise?..

And since no mafia were killed, there should only be six, ..why would that even be a question?..

I am also curious as to why you suggest that mad, and you be "investigated"?..
You and he play so differently, yet, you both command such attention form the other players?..I am not calling you mafia, nor mad, I am undecided, because you both play so forward, I have a hard time feeling you two out.
So, I am just asking, that since you two are both so influential, if you two, could maybe keep that in mind, when "talking in the thread" we are in a dire situation here, and I would hate to see the mafia get the town, I kinda like it here.

If there are clues in number 457 is it? I lost them. :/ I think maybe you are more like the Closer, than a detective. *lol* I like her, she's good, distracting, finding a way to make the criminals feel she's sympathizing with them, getting in their head, etc.

Interesting how later you'll say you "feel people out" easily, especially on the ever revealing Interweb, but above you say you're having a hard time doing it.

You ask these two do to something, keep in mind that they are influential hwne they 'talk in the thread' (are they supposed to talk elsewhere or something?!?!) And the rest follows a textbook claim to life. Ok. I see nothing above that point to anything. I don't know that you ever mention facts, at least any we don't know. It's a weird form of contribution, that doesn't contribute much on the outside. I'm supposed to be reading between the lines. I think maybe I'm really bad at this. There just isn't any information. *lol* It's just random talking. But I know you're above our level, so it must be code, or reverse psychology, or subliminal, or criminology 101. I just don't see it. ARR.

 

[NeonJulie]

LMAO, no offense taken, Its the screen name, I know, lol, I just figured I would clarify! It takes more than being called a guy to offend me! , ...lol

Going out on a limb here to say I think this is an uncontrived effort, just a remark. Oddly this is the first thing you've said I've comprehended.

 

[NeonJulie]

I think if I had investigative powers I would investigate the following people as my first six investigations:

OgerMvK
Coler
Madcrawdad
BKW1982
KingOfTheDeep
DangerDoll

These are the people who I respect how they post and I am most careful in reading them. These are who I watch.

I am not calling them mafia in anyway, nor am I calling them innocent.

I am stating that I RESPECT what they post and how they play the game. In our town, I would consider these people as influential citizens.

Hmm... I think the Club pact is broken. *jk* JohnLarson66 is now suspicious of BKW, instead of voting with him, but apparently is it just because he holds their gameplay in regard? Or was he following the same train of thought Zs was, and I having reviewed the alternate game play. (After this game, I confidently believe most everyone will be held in esteem, and the list will grow for some reason, instead of the same 5-6 to like 19. lol)

 

[Coler]

Now this really is my last post of the night

No way am I going to try and process the last umpteen posts by NJ, some of which contain allegations against me.

Is there anyone not under suspicion NJ ?? Anyone you can see isn't mafia ??