Mugshots Discussion Thread

[Lila]

That was appropriate for a family forum?

There was nothing tasteful about it.

 

[Corax]

It was no worse than what was on the Miss Universe pagent a few nights ago. One shot had issues, beautiful, perfect issues, but the rest were within what I would call acceptable. My problem with it was the OTHER girls that were linked to on the site.. Some of them left little, if anything, to the imagination.

Mog, taking glamour shots dressed in a such a manner is a lot different than seeing a gal go to work or school dressed like that. If the girls I usta work with would have came to work dressed like that, then I'm sure you can guess where I woulda spent my work hours. Or at least tried

 

[Lila]

I'm so freaking confussed. Alright, a woman pulling the sides of her bikini top away, to show as much of her tit as she can, and a bottom that's going up her a$$, is tasteful, and appropriate for a family site.

Yeah. Whatever.

Bye.

 

[Andy16]

Lila, it was pulled, their is no need to make a big deal about it or what other peoples opinions are. Its gone, isnt that what you want?

 

[dolphin7]

Pics like that are very marketable, but I find them tasteless, & unsuitable for a family forum. Undoubtedly that is a sexy, seductive-looking woman who knows what she's got But I stop short of calling her beautiful... that is too profound a word & to me those pics don't reflect that.

Even if that were a man I would not be impressed. Or maybe that just makes me "woman".

On another note, I see a lotta fully clad men & women in mugshots that I can call beautiful. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder, like, I personally have a weakness for baby-blues & anything otherwise rarely have an effect on me.

And you might find your friend beautiful but others who don't know him/her think otherwise.

 

[Leopardess]

She's free to make her opinion stated, just like corax and luv and you are.....

This site seems to have a problem with dissenting opinions sometimes! I mean in the fish part, too!

I don't care. I didn't see it while it was up...but I did see it in her link.

 

[~*LuvMyKribs*~]

Yeah people just cant take other people's opinions i've found. they just get all angry and flusterd.

i personally dont see anything wrong with her pictures.... but i agree, they aren't meant for a family forum.

why are some people so uptight about the human body? are you like that about your own?

i dont want to turn this into a debate thread or anything so i'll leave it at that....

to each thier own, and if you dont like it then dont look.

 

[dolphin7]

why are some people so uptight about the human body?

That's not the issue. For the record, I have photographed fine-art b&w portraits before, some half-nude, not sexually suggestive in any way. They bring out the soul of the subject, instead of emphasizing his/her sexuality

They strike you in the heart, not the groin.

 

[jacblades]

and if you dont like it then dont look

well she had it as a link, so people clicked on it. they didnt know they were going to see some half naked woman posing like a sex kitten.
and kribs-its not being uptight about the human body-everyone sees themselves naked every day. i dont htink they freak out in the shower. nudity is a private thing. the issue people are upset about is how the female body is often displayed so openly as merely a sex object (like in that pic).
and i dont really think it matters anymore-i think she registered-put 2 posts and then forgot the forum existed.

 

[dolphin7]

I had my suspicions. <bells going off>