<<What you are describing about humans is very different than what has been done to that fish. The fishes genetic mutation has been done simply for cosmetic purposes. It does NOTHING to enhance the life of the fish and only makes it harder for them. >>
True! In a sense I was comparing apples to oranges in my original post...
But, there are a lot of driving factors in the medical/drug "industry" other than the altruistic goal of enhancing the life of humans (or animals). And certainly, I don't want to minimize the benefits of medical technology. However, there's a fine line between theory and practice. It's just not that black and white. One post "seemed" to imply that breeding fancy goldfish is, perhaps, unethical. And yes, there may be some truth to that. But then again, the same thing could be said about keeping fish in an aquarium at all...
Granted, I don't think that either one (breeding fancy godfish or keeping fish in an aquarium) is unethical, though I do think there are problems with each. Rather, I think that when someone posts a picture of a big fat fancy lionhead or ranchu, someone should point out the negatives, but then lead the discussion toward "positive" breeding techniques that might eliminate the problems. In other words, what can fish breeders do to select away from genetic problems yet still mold their particular lines into arbitray, yet beautiful, shapes, sizes, and colors?
Rich
ps: I'm new to the list, so I realize that my comments may be inappropriate in this setting. However, after a week or so of reading the same old posts about "uncycled tanks" or "see my pictures" (both of which are good), I find myself yearning for a deeper level of discussion.