Thanks,
I used a Canon dslr for those pics. The first and third were at 100mm the second and forth 50mm. I am still trying to fool with the ISO to get the quality to the level I like.
Nah,
But I can see how someone could be confused when the fish is this small. Its an Amphilophus for sure. But it is still to be determined if its A. citrinellus or A.labiatus or some combination.