Newbies: think twice before getting an algae eater

  • Get the NEW AquariaCentral iOS app --> http://itunes.apple.com/app/id1227181058 // Android version will be out soon!

the loach

AC Members
Aug 6, 2018
1,599
835
120
It has become more or less common practice to get an "algae eater" in the tank to combat algae. This has not worked out very well for most people. 2 reasons:
Most "plecos" sold as algae eaters don't eat algae, or when they do grow up to 1 or 2 foot in length.

But even if you have a true algae eating fish that doesn't grow too large for a tank (like a bristlenose) the problem is a fish produces more algae as it can eat. How come?
The waste it produces comes back as different types of algae, and "algae eating" fish are highly specialized in 1 or 2 types of algae. Your aquarium is not a closed system where algae grow that are consumed by a fish, which waste grows the algae again it can eat, and so on. At some point the fish becomes too big, there aren't enough algae and you have to feed it, just causing more waste.

The only real method (beside manually cleaning the glass) is live plants. Get the right (low light) plants and conditions and the plants will outcompete the algae.
The formulae is light+fish waste=algae, or plant growth, your choice.
I have a whole bunch of tanks and none have algae, or an algae eater. It is really that simple.
 

tanker

Josh Holloway--Be mine!!!
Sep 1, 2003
7,321
333
116
Calif. SF Bay area
Visit site
Real Name
Jessica
This is true, Do not buy an animal to resolve an issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dougall

the loach

AC Members
Aug 6, 2018
1,599
835
120
Much in the same vein, although luckily this seems now more a thing of the past, was the idea of buying small bottom dwellers such as Corydoras catfish as a "clean up" or "maintenance" crew, who would eat uneaten food and even fish droppings.
 

OrionGirl

No freelancing!
Aug 14, 2001
14,053
342
143
Poconos
Real Name
Sheila
Doing frequent water changes to keep the nutrients below where algae can thrive works as well, but in general, plants are the easier option, and beneficial to the animals in other ways.

Buying an animal for any reason other than a) really like that animal and want to keep it, b) food for another animal that you really like and want to keep and cannot feed any other way is just a bad plan. That holds true for all manner of 'worker' animals, from snails to dithers. Every animal added to a closed system has a footprint, even if it fills a need. This is basic biology--it's true in our tanks, it's true in the wild.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fishorama

the loach

AC Members
Aug 6, 2018
1,599
835
120
And if you don't take it from me, take it from Rachel O'Leary...
"Why cleaner fish are a bad idea"

Now, if she could do a video about goldfish in aquariums...
 

Rbishop

Administrator
Staff member
Dec 30, 2005
40,727
452
143
70
Real Name
Mr. Normal
The "waste" doesn't "come back" as algae. It's the nutrients and photo period that creates the issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fishorama
zoomed.com
hikariusa.com
aqaimports.com
Store