I will not argue soft water for breeding discus, apistos, rasboras, blackwater fish in general, but that is not the topic.
The topic question refers to the KH/pH of the water and desirable levels for plants. The desirable level for plants in the large majority of public water supplies in the US is what comes out of the tap.
Plant tank folk get so wrapped up with the CO2/KH/pH tables that they make the mental leap that lower pH means more CO2 in the water. Yes it does, at and only at, constant KH. Repeat,
only at constant KH. Folks forget that the curves that create those tables are based on CO2
addition. Check
http://www.sfbaaps.com/reference/table_01.shtml
Look at KH 10.0, pH 7.0. The dissolved CO2 is 30ppm.
Look at KH 2.5, pH 6.4. The dissolved CO2 is 30ppm.
Guess what? The higher KH does not affect the solution of CO2. You start from a higher pH and end at a higher pH, but you get the same concentration of dissolved CO2. That is the only way this sort of three-variable table can function. The results can be distorted by acids other than carbonic, but the tables (for better or worse) assume no interference from other acids or buffers than carbonate/bicarbonate.
Very heavy going I admit, but you might try:
http://www.tomgriffin.com/aquasource/hardwater.shtml
HTH
Edit: If this confuses you, don't be dismayed. It confuses lots of folk, including a number of respected authors (who should IMHO know better). We all stumble over our own prejudices, most often because we don't stop and examine them for validity.