I really dislike arguments, but I think that article has some significant credibility problems. I was only able to give it a quick read, but I will look at it again when I have time. Basically, let me start with what the author says here:
"If the professional scientist specializing in piranhas cannot come up with a definitive answer to the question of whether there really exist a 'true black piranha', than I d'ont think anyone has the right to say with absolute certainty that they can say that a particular specimen is or is not a black piranha."
Besides the fact that the writing quality makes me somewhat skeptical of this person's concern for accuracy, the claim that he/she makes is also troublesome. If we are to assume that the piranhas he talks about are essentially unidentifiable, I find it hard to believe his conclusion that "the black piranha" cannot coexist with any other fish. Sorry if I am being unclear. What I mean to say is that, if the author has no basis for knowing whether or not a true black piranha exists, then he/she has absolutely no right to assert that the black piranha cannot be kept with other fish.
I have known three seperate people with experience keeping (what they credibly suspected to be) Black Piranhas, two of which successfully kept them with a variety of tankmates. Please, before you start throwing articles around as undeniable proof, take it upon yourself to investigate the matter personally. I have dealt with piranhas for a long time, and I have never encountered satisfactory scientific evidence to convince me that the "hypothetical" black piranha is a solitary fish. This is not to say that they are not extremely agressive-they are, and it is tough to find suitable tankmates, I do not disagree with you on that matter. But you are jumping to conclusions, and acting arrogantly.