Agreed (post #14). Scientific tests cited by Walstad determined that aquatic plants responded best (the photosynthesis activity producing oxygen was the measure) under light with a colour temperature between 6000K and 7000K, what she terms cool white. She writes:
The fact that plants did very well with Cool-white, which produces mostly green-yellow light was an unexpected result of this study. One would have expected plants to do better with Vita-Lite. This is because Vita-Light was designed for growing plants; its spectrum, which is rich in red and blue light, matches the light absorption of plant chlorophyll much better than Cool-white and many other fluorescent bulbs.
Cool-white was found to give off 13% more photosynthetic light than Vita-Light. Perhaps Cool-white's slightly higher light intensity explains its better performance? However, I would also argue that green-yellow light is what many submerged plants encounter in their natural environment. Aquatic light is not like terrestrial light where the blue and red wavelengths predominate. Aquatic light is unique. This is because the water itself absorbs red light, while DOC [dissolved organic carbons] absorbs blue light. What's leftover for plant photosynthesis is mainly green-yellow light. Aquatic plants may have adapted their photosynthetic machinery over the course of evolution to use green-yellow light fairly efficiently. Thus, the assumption that aquatic plants grow best with full-spectrum light may not be valid.
My own experience doesn't counter this, and I use 6700K over my single tube tanks and 5000K and 6500K mix over my dual-tube tanks. And from my limited research into LED suitable for planted aquaria, the LED producing much the same spread seems to prevail.
Byron.