There are seceral ways to view this, And some are very beneficial. For instance the remaining Lake victoria species in the hobby ware the only thing that prevented extinction of many of those fish. The nile perch more or less maurauded the wild populations if I understand it correctly. Without this hobby, few people would even know or care about those occurances. With this hobby, the cichlid species were preserved for the most part, and when a solution if found for the nile perch, the cichlids can be re-introduced to the wild. So we have essentially prevented extinction and have the ability to wait out a plauge, and then reinstate the wild populations.
Additionally theere is a good bit being done by responsible countries to preserve wild populations where applicable. The zxebra pleco is illegal to harvest in the wild right now, because the harvest pressure threatened extinction. More importantly, there are several folks breeding these fish for the hobby, and preserving the blood lines that are currently in captivity so if the remaining wild population should fail that fish will avoid extinction.
There have also been several species that were driven to extinction through the hobby, but things are not now as they always were, and this hobby and the folks in this hobby are largely responsible for helping more than they hurt.
I agree that we should be cautious of source, I also agree that we should look to captive bred animals more often than not.
I have been the owner of several wild caught fish, and enjoy the natural personalities and different characteristics of these fish, I'll also say that I only buy wild breeds that I know are doing well in the wild.
Overall, something that everyone should be aware of is the economic ramifications of stopping wild collecting of animals. The local economies live on those collections, without them we would see areas of starvation and economic failure which lead to black market advances and far less responsible practices. people will not starve to death when they can avoid it even if they have to break the law to eat.
Next is the cost of this hobby, If we stop all wild collections, the costs increase to the hobbyist. Then they either leave the hobby, or they have less money to re-invest in the interest of the hobby and the animals they house. Less money is less money any way you look at it. When times are lean in my home, I don't donate money to causes. So if the hobby becomes expensive the first thing that suffers is the organizitions out there doing good for the wild populations. So the economy that supports the wild populations is essentially the same economy that supports inexpensive animals in the pet stores. Mess with one and we mess with all of them.
And don't even think about suggesting the government increase taxes for those purposes. They already steal a good bit of my money for causes I don't approve of.
Additionally theere is a good bit being done by responsible countries to preserve wild populations where applicable. The zxebra pleco is illegal to harvest in the wild right now, because the harvest pressure threatened extinction. More importantly, there are several folks breeding these fish for the hobby, and preserving the blood lines that are currently in captivity so if the remaining wild population should fail that fish will avoid extinction.
There have also been several species that were driven to extinction through the hobby, but things are not now as they always were, and this hobby and the folks in this hobby are largely responsible for helping more than they hurt.
I agree that we should be cautious of source, I also agree that we should look to captive bred animals more often than not.
I have been the owner of several wild caught fish, and enjoy the natural personalities and different characteristics of these fish, I'll also say that I only buy wild breeds that I know are doing well in the wild.
Overall, something that everyone should be aware of is the economic ramifications of stopping wild collecting of animals. The local economies live on those collections, without them we would see areas of starvation and economic failure which lead to black market advances and far less responsible practices. people will not starve to death when they can avoid it even if they have to break the law to eat.
Next is the cost of this hobby, If we stop all wild collections, the costs increase to the hobbyist. Then they either leave the hobby, or they have less money to re-invest in the interest of the hobby and the animals they house. Less money is less money any way you look at it. When times are lean in my home, I don't donate money to causes. So if the hobby becomes expensive the first thing that suffers is the organizitions out there doing good for the wild populations. So the economy that supports the wild populations is essentially the same economy that supports inexpensive animals in the pet stores. Mess with one and we mess with all of them.
And don't even think about suggesting the government increase taxes for those purposes. They already steal a good bit of my money for causes I don't approve of.