Just for Hooked..no one else....Brains2 was.....
a player in Mafia #16. We have moved on to a new game. Pardon me if I am respecting an individuals right to remain unknown, but you seem to be obsessed with wanting to betray confidences, part of your "family" upbringing?
I also notice you post as soon as I make a vote to lynch Liz....protection for your future spouse...? Trying to draw attention away...?
:grinyes:
Actually, I can't reveal the identity, as per their request. It has happened in other games, and I respect their decision.
suspect list....
1= innocent
10= mafia
1-kuhli (great find)
10- Rbishop-beating movers? Certainly mafia
48 hour days againnn jeeeshh thats too long!
lol.
I'm going to throw a vote out here, just to get the ball rolling and see what other people are thinking.
I vote to lynch kuhli
seems like a jumpy newb, although im probably wrong.... vote is subject to change (and probably will)
But voting needs to start somewhere...
ok, I didn;t know if things were going to come up so quickly but apparently in everyone's giddyness to get the game rolling, I found something that peaked my interest.
here, Jo says she feels Kuhli had a great find... gee I am hoping she is not talking about the whole "beat the movers" thing. If that wasn't a twist of words, I dunno what was. Nonetheless, she says kuhli is a 1, most innocent.
Here, Jo says, let's get the ball moving... throws a vote out for, you guessed it, kulhi. But why, after all , she did have kuhli as most innocent. She never did explain that maybe she was thinking incorrectly or if she agreed with anything... only that ok, she may be jumping a newbie and it will probably change... I dunno.... it's not something I would do even just to throw out a ball if I thought someone was that innocent as to be a 1.
I just may venture to vote Jo... I think I will..... I vote to lynch Joander (subject of course, to change)
Jo.... did I just mess up the nuptuals?
ok, I didn;t know if things were going to come up so quickly but apparently in everyone's giddyness to get the game rolling, I found something that peaked my interest.
here, Jo says she feels Kuhli had a great find... gee I am hoping she is not talking about the whole "beat the movers" thing. If that wasn't a twist of words, I dunno what was. Nonetheless, she says kuhli is a 1, most innocent.
Here, Jo says, let's get the ball moving... throws a vote out for, you guessed it, kulhi. But why, after all , she did have kuhli as most innocent. She never did explain that maybe she was thinking incorrectly or if she agreed with anything... only that ok, she may be jumping a newbie and it will probably change... I dunno.... it's not something I would do even just to throw out a ball if I thought someone was that innocent as to be a 1.
I just may venture to vote Jo... I think I will..... I vote to lynch Joander (subject of course, to change)
Jo.... did I just mess up the nuptuals?