So, it seems the consensus is - no aesthetic fascism! Decor is as much to please the owner as the fish..I prefer 'naturalistic,' but then, with zebra danios in a tank with corydoras, how 'natural' is that??? So my version of natural isn't a real, wild version and will not suit purists (and how natural is putting any fish of any size in any aquarium)? Where do you draw the line? People who care about fish can decorate their tanks in sky blue pink with sequins if that floats their boat - the fish could care less, I'm sure, provided water quality, food and space are 'sufficient' (whatever that means). Surely, keeping a 12-inch pleco in a 90 gallon tank is no more 'naturalistic' than keeping a betta in a cup, considering their respective 'natural habitats?' It's simply a matter of doing the best we can for a captive animal, given our available knowledge and resources (I have neither the space, the floor joists nor the funds for a 90 gallon tank, anyway LOL).
By all means knock what does not do what it is supposed to do (which I thought was the essence of this thread anyway), but once you start defining likes and dislikes, there will be no end to all the beefs that appear on this site and which will unfairly and probably unintentionally hurt feelings or offend a fellow aquarist.
Sermon over
By all means knock what does not do what it is supposed to do (which I thought was the essence of this thread anyway), but once you start defining likes and dislikes, there will be no end to all the beefs that appear on this site and which will unfairly and probably unintentionally hurt feelings or offend a fellow aquarist.
Sermon over
