Tom Cruise is an idiot!!

judgemax said:
as for the vaccination debate i am all for it and i do have a problem ith people who dont vaccinate ...i would have loved to have breast fed my child to give him my antibodies but that wa snot medically possible ...and he has a sister that is two years older ..and because of mothers who did not vaccinate my daughter could not visist my son in the hospital ...causing me great greif because i had to choice which child to spend time with....people who dont vaccinate their children are not only putting their children at risk they are putting other peoples at risk....for those who dont vaccinate because of problems it might cause are giving their child the same chance either way ....hey they didnt die from the vaccine but they did because they caught polio...whooping cough ...severe chicken pocks and the fever couldnt be reduced ....hmmmmm, i wonder when it comes to parents that dont vaccinate their child if they were vaccinated themselves ,...sorry but thats one thing i feel very strongly about ...because some mother somewhere didnt vaccinate their child ....it almost caused my son his life.
Click to expand...

If your daughter is vaccinated, I don't understand what risk someone not being vaccinated could have posed for her. Do you mean she couldn't come to the hospital because she was sick? That's just common practice. How could lack of someone else's vaccinations have cost your son's life?

Hospitals are risky places to be for those who have compromised immune systems, period. It has nothing to do with vaccinations. There are many, many viruses for which there is no vaccine, and there are many, many deadly bacteria as well...some of which are difficult to treat due to over use of antibiotics. In hospital you are exposed to a whole host of stuff that can getcha. Quite frankly, it is more risky to birth a baby in a hospital and expose that baby to all the potential viruses, bacterial infections and superbugs than it is to have a baby at home, where the bacteria is already familiar. Hospitals are also risky for mom, with all the vaginal exams, intravenous, catheters, surgery, etc...all sorts of ways for bacteria to be introduced.

Additionally, it is quite rare to not be able to breastfeed, and there are many instances where women who can't breastfeed would have had better luck/experience if there was better support within hospital, community, clinics and at home for breastfeeding. There are still far too many institutions, doctors and nurses who don't truly understand/support breastfeeding and breastmilk, and end up undermining a mother's efforts, not to mention opinionated family members, spouses and friends. For those rare cases where it isn't possible to breastfeed, women should be given access to donated, pastuerized human milk. Milk Banks do exist in North America, they are unfortunately few and far between, but they can be instrumental in giving a health-challenged infant the best chance at survival.

So, before passing the buck to all those "mothers" who don't vaccinate their kids, I'd recommend one does a little bit of reading/investigating all the health risks out there.
 
well a child had contracted the chicken pox and my daughter was a carrier giving my son a 1 lb 13 oz baby the disease ...and i understand that there are health risks but they are far out weighed by the benifits ...as for the fact that i could not breast fead my son it was because he was a micro preemie and needed certian things that yes even breastmilk could not provide not to mention that at five months and very ill from the problems of this pregnancy my self i could not make milk even with the pills that are supossed to stimulate milk. and a milk bank was avalible but still it didnot cantain enough of the nutrients needed for my son to gain weight and eat correctly because of different intolerances . not that i am trying to pick a fight i did come off a bit harsh but it just seems rediculous to me that people would choose not to immunize their children ,,,unless health resons prevent it for instance you are sure it will cause a reaction why not do it?
 
judgemax said:
well a child had contracted the chicken pox and my daughter was a carrier giving my son a 1 lb 13 oz baby the disease ...and i understand that there are health risks but they are far out weighed by the benifits ...as for the fact that i could not breast fead my son it was because he was a micro preemie and needed certian things that yes even breastmilk could not provide not to mention that at five months and very ill from the problems of this pregnancy my self i could not make milk even with the pills that are supossed to stimulate milk. and a milk bank was avalible but still it didnot cantain enough of the nutrients needed for my son to gain weight and eat correctly because of different intolerances . not that i am trying to pick a fight i did come off a bit harsh but it just seems rediculous to me that people would choose not to immunize their children ,,,unless health resons prevent it for instance you are sure it will cause a reaction why not do it?
Click to expand...

Chicken pox vaccine has only been available for 6 or so years. It's only 40% effective, which means that many vaccinated children still contract the disease, and pass it along. It has nothing to do with not vaccinating. Sick people should not be visiting patients in hospital, period. And sick kids should be kept at home...not sent to school, daycare, etc (that goes for adults staying home from work when they're sick too!) That's how to keep others from contracting disease. Donated breastmilk likely passed on immunity to your son. Preemies have many challenges, breastmilk, from mom or donated, helps...moreso than formula ever can. I'm sorry you weren't able to breastfeed. It's wonderful that you tried.

BTW, breastmilk is the best thing that can be provided for an infant, especially if they're preemie. As for "why not do it" in terms of vaccinating, check out this book: What Your Doctor May Not Tell You about Children's Vaccinations. The authors, Stephanie Cave and Deborah Mitchell, are very matter of fact about the pros and cons of vaccinations to help parents make truly informed decisions on choosing whether or not to vaccinate, or to be selective about which vaccinations to get and when.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry if I'm way off Topic, but vaccinations have Mercury in them.

This is a Big problem...
 
vilhelm said:
Hello my friends!Are tom cruise a ciklid?he maybe get along whith some huge barbs?Best regards from your friend from sweden!
Click to expand...

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

I needed a good laugh *sigh* thank you
 
Last edited:
............

..there's no way i could have made that up ...

no way............ Win the Lotto, be irresponsible, and pumped with the best drugs... i can't do it...

:D
 
What I thought was funny about Mr. Cruise was that I couldn't tell his performance from any of his actual films.

By the way, Brooke Shields wrote a very eloquent and moving reply to Tom in the New York Times, which I can post if anyone wants to read it (I won't post here cause it's a little longish).

"Matt. Matt, Matt, you don't even-- you're glib." Geesh.
 
lots of celebrities are crazy. Whoop de doo. Who cares. Just because hes in a movie doesnt mean hes an expert in the medical field.


And just to put this out there- all religions have strange beliefs, how strange the beliefs are dont depend on what the beliefs are, but on how popular the religion is.

The Church states that the goal of Scientology is a world without war, criminals, and insanity, where good decent people have the freedom to reach their goals.
Click to expand...
oops, sorry Tom, I think you failed the basic requirement. :sad: :devil:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
AquariaCentral.com
Top Bottom