Vehicles can not be used to commit deadly force???????

greeneyedlady

Duchess of Comedy
Jul 4, 2002
173
0
0
MD, USA
Family Files Claim Over Teen's Shooting


Feb 23, 12:14 AM (ET)


LOS ANGELES (AP) - The family of a 13-year-old boy who was fatally shot by police chasing a stolen car filed a claim against the city alleging wrongful death and civil rights violations, an attorney said Tuesday.

The Feb. 6 shooting of Devin Brown was "one of the worst cases of a police homicide that we have ever seen," lawyer Brian Dunn said at a news conference.

The teen's mother, Evelyn Davis, attended but did not speak.

Dunn represents the teen's mother and works in the office of former O.J. Simpson lawyer Johnnie Cochran. He filed the claim with the city on Friday seeking unspecified damages of more than $10,000.


The claim contends the city is to blame for the boy's "wrongful death arising out of excessive force" and also claims "deliberate indifference to the maintenance, training and control of the Los Angeles Police Department."

If the claim is rejected, Dunn said the family can file a lawsuit.

The city attorney's office had not received the claim by Monday afternoon and could not comment, spokesman Frank Mateljan said.

Brown, who is black, was behind the wheel of the stolen car that led officers on a 4 a.m. chase and backed into a patrol car. A Hispanic officer fired 10 shots at the driver.

"At most, what we have heard is that he was driving a car that didn't belong to him," Dunn said. "We don't have the death penalty for that."

The city Police Commission revised the LAPD's shooting policy after the teen's death. It now prohibits officers from firing at a moving vehicle unless the officer or another individual is threatened with deadly force other than the vehicle.





Ah excuse me the kid was underage driving a vehicle that was not his at 4 in the morning, but he was not in the wrong the police were??????????How were the police to know the age of the driver at 4 in the morning all they saw was a vehicle they were trying to stop. No I don't agree with the shooting per see but since I was not there I can not say how threatened the police officer felt.
Now as to their new shooting policy: a moving vehicle is not considered a weapon when used in a threatening manner, oh what I know moving vehicles can't kill, mame or destroy, right????????????? Get real..............
 
I couldn't agree more GEL! Pure BS and exactly what is wrong with society. While I agree that the police force must be open and transparent in their enforcement of justice, I believe that society has the responsibility to support those men and women who put their lives on the line to protect ours.

As for vehicles being dangerous, it wasn't too long ago that a teen in Halifax, while on parole for a previous violation I might add, stole a car and went joyriding and killed a girl crossing the street as he ran the red light. I would have much rather the police shot and killed him and have the girl still alive. He was a drain on society and will continue to be so, his own mother has all but disowned him (she actually argued against his being paroled), although I believe that she must be the ultimate root of the problem, but then I have a tendency to blame parents for their childrens' actions. :rolleyes:
 
FL Knifemaker said:
Only 10 shots were fired??? Did his gun jam??? Where was his partner???

If only he hadn't left his bazooka back at the office.........

Maybe next time he'll bring an extra clip.,
 
FL Knifemaker said:
Only 10 shots were fired??? Did his gun jam??? Where was his partner???

LOL

Reminds me of a joke!

IM going to screw this up big time but someone will post the real one! But very dirty, I will give jist!

A Cadillac seated with 4 people drives off a cliff and all die! Whats wrong with the picture?

A caddilac seats 5!
 
One must always remember, there is usually a split second to decide upon using deadly force. If a car is moving at high speed towards a law enforcement officer, with an intent to do harm, that split second is even shorter. There's no time to consider race, creed or gender. We must give those that serve and protect the benefit of the doubt in these situations.
 
happychem said:
I think that someone played a little too much GTA...
Now, multiply that times the million+ kids who are playing GTA and the like. I don't have high hopes for this next generation. There are going to be some decent ones, but I personally see the vast majority already circling the drain.
 
FL Knifemaker said:
One must always remember, there is usually a split second to decide upon using deadly force. If a car is moving at high speed towards a law enforcement officer, with an intent to do harm, that split second is even shorter. There's no time to consider race, creed or gender. We must give those that serve and protect the benefit of the doubt in these situations.

Exactly. It was said he was backing the car into the patrol car. No, they didn't say how fast he was going. There appears to be an intent to harm. 'Backing into' makes it sound soft, like he was just pulling out of a parking spot and bumped the car opposite him. Tell it like it is!
 
my teens are abused I don't let them have anything like GTA, they have to be happy with ratchet and clank, no games of any sort in my house that involve bloody graphics and the like, oh yes my teens are deprived ;)
 
AquariaCentral.com